General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Trump may be winning the war on ‘political correctness’
Article from the Washington Post
It was a sentiment felt strongly across the political spectrum, by 62 percent of Democrats, 68 percent of independents and 81 percent of Republicans. Among whites, 72 percent said they felt that way, but so did 61 percent of nonwhites.
People feel tremendous cultural condescension directed at them, and that their values are being smirked at, laughed at by the political and media elite, said GOP strategist Steve Schmidt.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)We lose Democratic party supporters when people get ridiculous about being PC.
One can see this kind of PC policing here at DU. Rather than giving the benefit of the doubt, even if slightly offended.. alert!!!
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)Society is changing, but not everyone evolves at the same speed. You end up pushing away people that are inclined to agree with you.
Cut someone a break if they improperly use one of 75 gender classifications.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)I thought "PC" was about reminding folks why it's inappropriate to toss out words like 'spic', 'fairy', 'dyke', 'dumb broad', etc. in daily conversation, or why telling Jew jokes around the water cooler might be offensive to your colleagues (despite it being commonplace a generation or two ago)...
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Instead staff at the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment (DETI) in Belfast will use the term 'thought-showers' when they get together to think creatively. A spokeswoman said: 'The DETI does not use the term brainstorming on its training courses on the grounds that it may be deemed pejorative.'
Sources inside the department said there was concern that the term would cause offence to people with epilepsy as well those with brain tumours or brain injuries.
But the Campaign for Plain English complained that the decision had 'reached the point of real ridicule'. 'You do sometimes wonder if some people haven't got anything better to do with their time,' said spokesman John Wild. 'Do they just sit down and search out enough words until eventually they can say: "I can make that out to be politically incorrect"?
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2005/jun/26/uk.politicalnews
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)How is this relevant?
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)and when they mean is not, on the whole, avoiding the insults that Blue_Tires gave an example of in #3, but the kind of thing Nye Bevan gave an example of in #5.
There will be some people who do actually want to be able to use the insults, but when 62% of Democrats, and 61% of nonwhites, think political correctness causes the USA problems, it's not about the genuine insults, but about the more ridiculous stuff like 'brainstorming'. The Guardian writer called that 'political correctness', and that's a fairly good indication that it went too far.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)philosslayer
(3,076 posts)It becomes a "golden shower"
SolutionisSolidarity
(606 posts)Now it's all about microaggresions. It is no longer enough to avoid actively insulting people; now every thing you do must be examined for unconscious bias lest you be equated to a modern day Hitler. At least that's what it's like on the Internet. People are much more accommodating in meat space.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)and should not be used as a microcosm of public discourse...
Democat
(11,617 posts)Look around DU and see why even many Democrats have turned against extreme political correctness
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Now it has become a platform for a self-selecting few moral scolds trying to use (social) media to bully majorities into catering to private agendas.
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)There is no right from any source to never be offended, but way too many people seem to think there is. I hear and see things that offend me all the time. I choose my battles. Sometimes I fight back, sometimes I ignore, considering the source. But I do not attempt to silence unless something is genuinely hateful (not what gets egregiously labeled as "hate speech" too frequently). There is just something sickeningly wrong with trying to muzzle people just because we agree with them.
demmiblue
(36,838 posts)would be in vogue?
Using the PC label as an attack is just a cover for those who have the same tendencies. And, yes, there is a certain demographic that is infected with the anti-PC virus.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)It's universal across all demographics.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)While I agree that we can go too far in stifling controversial speech in the name of sensitivity, that's not what bothers the Trump crowd. They're just pissed that you can't be overtly racist at work anymore.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)It's more about stuff such as banning words like "blacklist" and "niggardly" because of their perceived racism, avoiding terms like "manhole cover" because it is supposedly sexist, and trying to rename Christmas trees "Holiday trees" because of the danger of offending non-Christians. And avoiding the term "master bedroom" because of its perceived connotations with slavery.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)I said "the Trump crowd". I'm quite certain that most people are not in that crowd.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)the province of RW misogynists.
Then I read the comments of people who claim to be Progressives about Megyn Kelly.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)I haven't the slightest desire to tell racist jokes and think Trump is a blowhard bigoted caricature, but I don't want to have to mangle the language with invented neuter pronouns, walk on eggshells around potential "microaggressions" if I don't "validate" every possible group's feelings of oppression even when I haven't the slightest clue what or why they are, and have to worry about misinterpretation of completely unbiased terms which sound like they might be biased ones.
Folks also tend not to be too keen on supporting groups who cheer for "tears" from people like themselves simply based on having the majority complexion.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)I agree with you completely as it relates to some of the "PC run amok" situations you describe and I don't mean to suggest that everyone who bristles at that (and I am among those myself) longs to bash Jews in the break room. However, I would still maintain that you and I are not the audience that Donald Trump and other republicans are talking to when they talk about the evils of "political correctness". He's talking to people that don't like having to curb their racist/misogynist views in public. Those that have outdated views on race and gender don't want to say "People hate my ideas"; they'd rather say "Elites use 'political correctness' to put us down"
romanic
(2,841 posts)but I dislike Trump even more than a sniveling internet crybaby.