Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

fleur-de-lisa

(14,623 posts)
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 05:29 PM Jan 2016

More Than 100 Lawyers Tell The Supreme Court Why Their Abortions Mattered

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/lawyers-abortion-supreme-court_568d4387e4b0a2b6fb6e298b

Women from virtually every corner of the legal profession told the Supreme Court on Monday why their decisions to seek abortions earlier in life meant the world to who they are today. More than 100 lawyers joined a brief in support of Texas abortion clinics in the case Whole Woman's Health v. Cole, a major abortion case the court will hear in March that is widely seen as a threat to the landmark Roe v. Wade.

The case involves a Texas law that imposes requirements on abortion clinics that, if implemented, would shutter all but about 10 of them -- and which critics say have little or nothing to do with advancing women's health.

The document -- one of 45 "friend of the court" briefs rallying behind the clinics opposing the law -- is filled with personal stories from lawyers who "believe that they could not have been the attorneys they have been or done the fine work that they have, were it not for their access to reproductive choice."

Signatories to the brief include former and current public defenders, government officials, judges, corporate attorneys, law professors, judicial clerks and others considered "credits to the legal profession."

more at link
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More Than 100 Lawyers Tell The Supreme Court Why Their Abortions Mattered (Original Post) fleur-de-lisa Jan 2016 OP
I like that they are doing this, but... Doctor_J Jan 2016 #1
 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
1. I like that they are doing this, but...
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 05:57 PM
Jan 2016

I thought the Court was supposed to base their decisions on their interpretation of the law, and not on any emotional evidence/pleas. I don't think the anti-choicers should make presentations either.

Just MHO.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More Than 100 Lawyers Tel...