General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsApparently, I知 Not the Only One Who Thinks Ralph Nader Is a Big Fat Idiot
This is Gloria Steinam on Ralph Nader from 2000. This is why we women don't link to him or believe anything he says:
http://andrewtobias.com/column/apparently-im-not-the-only-one-who-thinks-ralph-nader-is-a-big-fat-idiot/
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
pnwmom
(108,960 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)You might want to check out the meaning of the word.
malaise
(268,734 posts)What he did for my safety with seat belts is more than most of us will do in our entire lives
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Because you believe in democracy so much that you get to decide who participates???
Come on now -the two dominant political parties don't own America.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Nader attacks the former & helps the latter.
Fuck Nader.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)I don't have a problem with 3rd parties, I have a problem with him.
Whenever someone criticizes Nader, the response is always a screed about the two-party monopoly along with some passing reference to the Corvair.
It is entirely possible to dislike the man for his stance on a number of issues.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts).... to vote for a predetermined candidate?????!!!!1111one
pnwmom
(108,960 posts)by drawing 95,000 progressive votes-- in Florida alone --that could have gone to Gore.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)I tell them that New Hampshire wasn't.
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/hfojvt/118
pnwmom
(108,960 posts)who had the most influence on handing Bush a win, by bringing the results so close that the decision went to SCOTUS.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)the media focused on Florida, but New Hampshire ALSO decided the election.
If Gore had just won New Hampshire (with, say 58% of the Nader vote) he would have been President - irregardless of Florida. So Florida simply was NOT the one and only state that mattered.
Nader defenders can muddy the water with SCOTUS and Jeb Bush in Florida. They cannot do that in New Hampshire (although, like you, they will claim that only Florida matters, (amazing the power of the media, eh?))
pnwmom
(108,960 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)where one party is always going to have less money/media to fight saying they are both the same is dangerous.
Do YOU believe in destroying the country to save it?
Cause that is exactly what Nader's strategy was. His strategy was for things to get worse so they'd eventually get better.
THEY will decide who gets to run for president...now run along like a good little child.
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)He made his bones alleging the corvair was unsafe when objective testing and statistics showed it was no more so than any other car in its class, effectively removing a perfectly acceptable vehicle from the market that was priced for the working class. He's been a fraud in every endeavor.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)What he did as an advocate for public safety was great, and his actions saved lives. I admire him for that. He should have stayed out of politics.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Doesn't mean he should have run for President...
RandiFan1290
(6,224 posts)and ask Democrats to fight harder instead of being so subservient.
pnwmom
(108,960 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)In honor of a fallen artist...or maybe I should say rising star joining the universe on a different plane. RIP Bowie.
marble falls
(57,015 posts)he can't win, he can only spoil.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)You're an idiot if, like Nader, you find that one of the two major parties is closer to your views on just about every issue, yet you run as a spoiler anyway.
Nader insinuated that he would prefer a Bush victory, but that wasn't because he preferred Bush on any policy grounds. It was because of his (now failed) prediction that, if Bush became President, the Democratic Party would repent of having disagreed with Nader about anything, and would lurch hard in his direction. Instead, we got eight years of Bush that pulled the whole country to the right.
The reason I say "almost anyone" is that some people aren't in the situation described in my first paragraph. In particular, I have sympathy for the Libertarian Party. To us, the most obvious point about libertarians is the way they would ruthlessly shred the social safety net and leave big business unregulated, positions on which the GOP is better for them than the Democrats. What we sometimes forget is that many libertarians are against foreign adventurism (the Cato Institute opposed the Iraq War) and support individual rights against the security state (Ron Paul voted against the PATRIOT Act) and against the Christofascists (many libertarians support reproductive rights and marriage equality). On these issues they would prefer a Democrat over a Republican.
A libertarian could reasonably conclude that a third party is preferable to voting for either major party. The same is not true of someone like Nader or the typical Tea Partier -- someone who, unlike the libertarians, can be placed somewhere on the traditional left-right axis with only minor oversimplification.
marble falls
(57,015 posts)can't think of who - maybe Bill Clinton if his VP is Bernie Sanders. Maybe.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)an eccentric, sexist, narcissistic curmudgeon.
In fantasy America he's still king.
I despise him and will never forgive him for 2000. Spare me the usual defense song and dance. If Nader hadn't run his useless and quixotic campaign we would have avoided two wars and started acting on climate change in time.
Nader exudes The Crazy. He is a creepy old fart.
DinahMoeHum
(21,779 posts)(snip)
". . .Ralph Nader is the most arrogant and narcissistic guy I've ever met. I had a meeting with him in the early Nineties. I was jazzed going into the meeting, and I was disgusted leaving. I don't think I've ever met a bigger asshole. If he hadn't run in the last election, we wouldn't be in Iraq and thousands of people wouldn't have died needlessly. . ."
(snip)
Mike Nelson
(9,945 posts)...but may have become more interested in Nader than a greater good.
MattSh
(3,714 posts)Really, who gives a shit about an article from 15 years ago.
pnwmom
(108,960 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)has about 30% of the primary vote.
So easy to throw stones when you don't have to do the hard work of building coalitions.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)whatthehey
(3,660 posts)He's not fat at all. I don't think he's even all that big.
Perhaps if you replaced those words with oh I dunno, "loathsome" and "treasonous" it would be more accurate.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)I know I have.
He is 6' 3" (according to the web) so that's pretty big.
Somebody apparently didn't know that it is insensitive to use fat as a pejorative, even though it's the idiocy that is supposed to be 500 pounds, rather than the person (maybe, Franken's book, after all, was partly about Limbaugh's weight)
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)Gothmog
(144,951 posts)Archae
(46,301 posts)Anansi1171
(793 posts)That's why I care about the Democratic Party winning, and I will support that candidate that can win.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)...a couple of stupid ones, and a couple of nonsensical ones.
hunter
(38,304 posts)He's a relief valve on the big corporate pressure cooker. A knob.
U.S. Americans are trained from childhood to "work within the system."
That's not effective activism in a political system that's irredeemably corrupt.
Nader is an intrinsic part of that corrupt system, an active member of the nasty Washington D.C. boy's club.