Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Apparently, I知 Not the Only One Who Thinks Ralph Nader Is a Big Fat Idiot (Original Post) leftofcool Jan 2016 OP
Ever More Anti-Ralph Obfuscation cantbeserious Jan 2016 #1
You obviously don't know what your fancy word even means. nt pnwmom Jan 2016 #17
. JTFrog Jan 2016 #24
In This Case -The Attempt To Distract And Confuse Those That Are History Challenged cantbeserious Jan 2016 #38
Obfuscation? Hardly. Even if you love Nader, this doesn't qualify as obfuscation. Buzz Clik Jan 2016 #26
I like Ralph Nader malaise Jan 2016 #2
He should have stuck to consumer affairs and stayed out of politics leftofcool Jan 2016 #3
Why? malaise Jan 2016 #4
+1000 marmar Jan 2016 #5
But one party works to build America up, while the other works to tear it down. baldguy Jan 2016 #7
Because he is anti women's reproductive rights for one. leftofcool Jan 2016 #8
^^That Orrex Jan 2016 #11
Oh, sure. I suppose you want to die in a Corvair driving to the polls .... Buzz Clik Jan 2016 #27
Because Ralph was the single PROGRESSIVE who helped elect Bush, pnwmom Jan 2016 #18
they will always claim Florida was stolen hfojvt Jan 2016 #30
Florida was the single state that decided that election and Nader was the single "progressive" pnwmom Jan 2016 #32
you clearly did not read my link hfojvt Jan 2016 #40
I see. I thought you were going the other way on this. Thanks for explaining . n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #42
Because he was dishonest in the extreme, and in a two party system KittyWampus Jan 2016 #21
+1000 artislife Jan 2016 #31
He wasn't even that great in that regard Major Nikon Jan 2016 #45
Very true awoke_in_2003 Jan 2016 #46
I like Norman Borlaug. He saved billions of lives. Recursion Jan 2016 #10
Might be time to move on RandiFan1290 Jan 2016 #6
Might be time for DUers to stop posting Nader's worthless opinions on 2016. n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #19
People don't get excited by musak and that is what the party ran. artislife Jan 2016 #33
Anyone who runs a third party campaign in a two party system is an idiot... marble falls Jan 2016 #9
Almost anyone. Jim Lane Jan 2016 #43
Almost no one. Not Trump, Cruz, Clinton or Sanders... marble falls Jan 2016 #44
He's become rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #12
Bob Weir (Grateful Dead) also said it back in 2004. . . DinahMoeHum Jan 2016 #13
He did some good... Mike Nelson Jan 2016 #14
Bored? Slow news day? MattSh Jan 2016 #15
Nader was just on the Greatest Page here, pontificating on 2016. n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #20
Ideologues appeal to their fellow ideologues. Which is a big reason Sanders KittyWampus Jan 2016 #22
Point 7 makes Nader sound like some "brogressive" idiot on Reddit who "hates PC". Odin2005 Jan 2016 #16
You are WRONG whatthehey Jan 2016 #23
I was kinda wondering if he had put on weight hfojvt Jan 2016 #36
I stand corrected. Big is back in. whatthehey Jan 2016 #41
Not as long as I'm alive. n/t tabasco Jan 2016 #25
Nader is a joke and no one should pay any attention to his stupidity Gothmog Jan 2016 #28
Nader is a liar, hypocrite, 1%'er, anti-union, vicious old man. Archae Jan 2016 #29
Voting for that moron was the greatest mistake of my adult life. Anansi1171 Jan 2016 #34
Lol, it exposed you though! Nt Logical Jan 2016 #35
She made a couple of good points... Orsino Jan 2016 #37
Nader's a tool who surrounds himself with sycophants. Always has been. hunter Jan 2016 #39
 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
26. Obfuscation? Hardly. Even if you love Nader, this doesn't qualify as obfuscation.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:47 PM
Jan 2016

You might want to check out the meaning of the word.

malaise

(268,734 posts)
2. I like Ralph Nader
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:52 AM
Jan 2016

What he did for my safety with seat belts is more than most of us will do in our entire lives

malaise

(268,734 posts)
4. Why?
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:58 AM
Jan 2016

Because you believe in democracy so much that you get to decide who participates???

Come on now -the two dominant political parties don't own America.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
7. But one party works to build America up, while the other works to tear it down.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:02 AM
Jan 2016

Nader attacks the former & helps the latter.

Fuck Nader.

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
8. Because he is anti women's reproductive rights for one.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:04 AM
Jan 2016

I don't have a problem with 3rd parties, I have a problem with him.

Orrex

(63,173 posts)
11. ^^That
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:37 AM
Jan 2016

Whenever someone criticizes Nader, the response is always a screed about the two-party monopoly along with some passing reference to the Corvair.

It is entirely possible to dislike the man for his stance on a number of issues.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
27. Oh, sure. I suppose you want to die in a Corvair driving to the polls ....
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:49 PM
Jan 2016

.... to vote for a predetermined candidate?????!!!!1111one

pnwmom

(108,960 posts)
18. Because Ralph was the single PROGRESSIVE who helped elect Bush,
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:06 PM
Jan 2016

by drawing 95,000 progressive votes-- in Florida alone --that could have gone to Gore.

pnwmom

(108,960 posts)
32. Florida was the single state that decided that election and Nader was the single "progressive"
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:09 PM
Jan 2016

who had the most influence on handing Bush a win, by bringing the results so close that the decision went to SCOTUS.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
40. you clearly did not read my link
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:34 PM
Jan 2016

the media focused on Florida, but New Hampshire ALSO decided the election.

If Gore had just won New Hampshire (with, say 58% of the Nader vote) he would have been President - irregardless of Florida. So Florida simply was NOT the one and only state that mattered.

Nader defenders can muddy the water with SCOTUS and Jeb Bush in Florida. They cannot do that in New Hampshire (although, like you, they will claim that only Florida matters, (amazing the power of the media, eh?))

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
21. Because he was dishonest in the extreme, and in a two party system
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:09 PM
Jan 2016

where one party is always going to have less money/media to fight saying they are both the same is dangerous.

Do YOU believe in destroying the country to save it?

Cause that is exactly what Nader's strategy was. His strategy was for things to get worse so they'd eventually get better.

Major Nikon

(36,818 posts)
45. He wasn't even that great in that regard
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 05:14 PM
Jan 2016

He made his bones alleging the corvair was unsafe when objective testing and statistics showed it was no more so than any other car in its class, effectively removing a perfectly acceptable vehicle from the market that was priced for the working class. He's been a fraud in every endeavor.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
46. Very true
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 02:13 AM
Jan 2016

What he did as an advocate for public safety was great, and his actions saved lives. I admire him for that. He should have stayed out of politics.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
10. I like Norman Borlaug. He saved billions of lives.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:21 AM
Jan 2016

Doesn't mean he should have run for President...

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
33. People don't get excited by musak and that is what the party ran.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:10 PM
Jan 2016

In honor of a fallen artist...or maybe I should say rising star joining the universe on a different plane. RIP Bowie.

marble falls

(57,015 posts)
9. Anyone who runs a third party campaign in a two party system is an idiot...
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:19 AM
Jan 2016

he can't win, he can only spoil.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
43. Almost anyone.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:10 PM
Jan 2016

You're an idiot if, like Nader, you find that one of the two major parties is closer to your views on just about every issue, yet you run as a spoiler anyway.

Nader insinuated that he would prefer a Bush victory, but that wasn't because he preferred Bush on any policy grounds. It was because of his (now failed) prediction that, if Bush became President, the Democratic Party would repent of having disagreed with Nader about anything, and would lurch hard in his direction. Instead, we got eight years of Bush that pulled the whole country to the right.

The reason I say "almost anyone" is that some people aren't in the situation described in my first paragraph. In particular, I have sympathy for the Libertarian Party. To us, the most obvious point about libertarians is the way they would ruthlessly shred the social safety net and leave big business unregulated, positions on which the GOP is better for them than the Democrats. What we sometimes forget is that many libertarians are against foreign adventurism (the Cato Institute opposed the Iraq War) and support individual rights against the security state (Ron Paul voted against the PATRIOT Act) and against the Christofascists (many libertarians support reproductive rights and marriage equality). On these issues they would prefer a Democrat over a Republican.

A libertarian could reasonably conclude that a third party is preferable to voting for either major party. The same is not true of someone like Nader or the typical Tea Partier -- someone who, unlike the libertarians, can be placed somewhere on the traditional left-right axis with only minor oversimplification.

marble falls

(57,015 posts)
44. Almost no one. Not Trump, Cruz, Clinton or Sanders...
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 04:47 PM
Jan 2016

can't think of who - maybe Bill Clinton if his VP is Bernie Sanders. Maybe.

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
12. He's become
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:48 AM
Jan 2016

an eccentric, sexist, narcissistic curmudgeon.

In fantasy America he's still king.

I despise him and will never forgive him for 2000. Spare me the usual defense song and dance. If Nader hadn't run his useless and quixotic campaign we would have avoided two wars and started acting on climate change in time.

Nader exudes The Crazy. He is a creepy old fart.

DinahMoeHum

(21,779 posts)
13. Bob Weir (Grateful Dead) also said it back in 2004. . .
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 09:17 AM
Jan 2016
http://krupsjustsayin.blogspot.com/2004/09/listen-to-beast.html

(snip)
". . .Ralph Nader is the most arrogant and narcissistic guy I've ever met. I had a meeting with him in the early Nineties. I was jazzed going into the meeting, and I was disgusted leaving. I don't think I've ever met a bigger asshole. If he hadn't run in the last election, we wouldn't be in Iraq and thousands of people wouldn't have died needlessly. . ."
(snip)
 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
22. Ideologues appeal to their fellow ideologues. Which is a big reason Sanders
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:11 PM
Jan 2016

has about 30% of the primary vote.

So easy to throw stones when you don't have to do the hard work of building coalitions.

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
23. You are WRONG
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:39 PM
Jan 2016

He's not fat at all. I don't think he's even all that big.

Perhaps if you replaced those words with oh I dunno, "loathsome" and "treasonous" it would be more accurate.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
36. I was kinda wondering if he had put on weight
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:14 PM
Jan 2016

I know I have.

He is 6' 3" (according to the web) so that's pretty big.

Somebody apparently didn't know that it is insensitive to use fat as a pejorative, even though it's the idiocy that is supposed to be 500 pounds, rather than the person (maybe, Franken's book, after all, was partly about Limbaugh's weight)

Anansi1171

(793 posts)
34. Voting for that moron was the greatest mistake of my adult life.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:12 PM
Jan 2016

That's why I care about the Democratic Party winning, and I will support that candidate that can win.

hunter

(38,304 posts)
39. Nader's a tool who surrounds himself with sycophants. Always has been.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:28 PM
Jan 2016

He's a relief valve on the big corporate pressure cooker. A knob.

U.S. Americans are trained from childhood to "work within the system."

That's not effective activism in a political system that's irredeemably corrupt.

Nader is an intrinsic part of that corrupt system, an active member of the nasty Washington D.C. boy's club.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Apparently, I知 Not the O...