Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 09:45 AM Jan 2016

Be Careful What You Ask For. Burns At Risk With Militia's Free Access.

It reports of intimidation and militia surveillance of Burns resident who may not support them is true, it shows that the town itself is open to infiltration by other militia and militia sympathizers. If local authorities cannot or will not enforce the law the town itself is effectively invaded. Having armed people running around whose intentions are unclear is dangerous.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Be Careful What You Ask For. Burns At Risk With Militia's Free Access. (Original Post) TheMastersNemesis Jan 2016 OP
Well, if the "militia" people Bettie Jan 2016 #1
It works for ISIS. Scuba Jan 2016 #2
And it is working for these dickheads Bettie Jan 2016 #3
The local authories cannot do that which the Federal authorities do not command or permit. It's Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #4
The passive response to these insurrectionists continues to baffle me. phantom power Jan 2016 #5
"armed people running around whose intentions are unclear " jberryhill Jan 2016 #6
Well then, impose a curfew. DetlefK Jan 2016 #7
That's not a 'curfew,' properly speaking. More like a 'registry.' - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #8
No militia militants in town after sundown. :) nt pinboy3niner Jan 2016 #9
This is "occupy" white militant style. Baitball Blogger Jan 2016 #10
Sounds like the real ISIS. Vinca Jan 2016 #11

Bettie

(16,083 posts)
1. Well, if the "militia" people
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 09:49 AM
Jan 2016

can get the people who don't agree with them to flee the town, then SCORE! Free houses for them and their families!

They can set to expanding their sphere of influence and make the timid Feds back off farther.

Bettie

(16,083 posts)
3. And it is working for these dickheads
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 09:56 AM
Jan 2016

because the government is too afraid of them to act.

I'm not saying violence is the answer, but declaring that you will NEVER use violence just makes these "people" know that they can do whatever they please, wherever they please.

Give it time, there will be other takeovers and other anemic non-responses until they declare that they are a separate nation. Probably called Dumbfuckistan.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
4. The local authories cannot do that which the Federal authorities do not command or permit. It's
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 10:15 AM
Jan 2016

wrong to keep heaping on them demands that they do that which they are not authorized to do.

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
5. The passive response to these insurrectionists continues to baffle me.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 10:36 AM
Jan 2016

It makes me feel like there's some dynamic at the government level, or law enforcement level, that is causing a deliberate decision to let these people accomplish their anti-government goals. I hope that's not true.

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
7. Well then, impose a curfew.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 11:40 AM
Jan 2016

Anybody who's not a registered resident of that town either leaves or gets arrested.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Be Careful What You Ask F...