General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMilitary Folk: Is there protocol for how to react to a president's speech?
I am seeing a LOT of people say that the military "non-response" to President Obama's speech "says it all". It's times like this that I miss my military father more than ever. He would have easily set this straight.
Isn't it true that military personnel are not supposed to react at their Commander's speeches?
randys1
(16,286 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)and not because I want them to get the traffic:
http://www.conservativeoutfitters.com/blogs/news/83681153-video-joint-chiefs-diss-obama-at-the-state-of-the-union-2016
randys1
(16,286 posts)to be honest
I do know righty hates America as long as it isnt white
JHB
(37,158 posts)...or trying to engage in the old sport of Kremlin watching, trying to guess who was in favor within the Kremlin based on who was standing where during the big May Day parades through Red Square.
The only way to really judge it would be comparing how they've acted over the years, going back maybe to Eisenhower. Anyone who opines without a basis for comparison is just passing gas.
treestar
(82,383 posts)make assumptions that the entire military is Republican, loves Republican Presidents, and disrespects Democratic ones (which, if they did, would prove they are unprofessional and unpatriotic and not really serving this country when it elects a D president, but the Rs who push this never realize how bad they are making the military look).
edgineered
(2,101 posts)and later at various commands is that the Public Relations Office or Officer is the only one authorized to make a statement. That is how it was for the three enlistments I served, but these days, who knows?
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Given that there were US personnel under detention by an unfriendly foreign power, and that it happened under their watch at a particularly poor time for the President, politically, I think their circumspection was entirely appropriate. The President's man, Kerry, was needed to pull the fat out of the frying pan.
1939
(1,683 posts)First time I was in Vietnam, LBJ was president. Second time Nixon was president.
When either one would be on Armed Forces Network TV, they would be given a massive dose of middle fingers and derogatory comments that would make "You lie" seem tame.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)a long deployment. David was married to Julie Nixon the presidents daughter. Nixon appearances would hold up liberty for hours. It really pissed off the sailors wanting to get the hell off the ship after a six month cruise. Behind the scene he got a lot of fingers.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)No response is the SOP. We're generally not allowed to speak on camera as a representative of the military unless specifically designated. We foot soldiers may something contrary to official doctrine. That was my experience.
LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)Long standing rule in the military. That's why you never see a uniformed person at a campaign rally.
moondust
(19,972 posts)Last edited Fri Jan 15, 2016, 10:11 PM - Edit history (1)
Faithfully serving whoever happens to be running the government at any given time. Any overt gesture "could be" interpreted as a political statement, though polite applause probably wouldn't alarm anybody.
(Of course they can still vote like anybody else.)
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)it is protocol for them to not react one way or the other. The Supremes didn't react either.
jen63
(813 posts)I would think. Their oath is to the Constitution.
1939
(1,683 posts)but not to be his cheerleaders. Taking part in polite applause at the end of the speech would be acceptable but they shouldn't show enthusiasm for all of the political zingers every president tosses out there for applause lines.
Donkees
(31,370 posts)...the cameras went to the joint chiefs. They wouldn't be applauding themselves.