A Senate Candidate Spills The Beans: Running A Positive Campaign Is For Suckers..Huff Post

[Stuart G]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/jack-kingston-candidate-confessional_us_56d4b924e4b0871f60e
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

A well-timed negative ad can be brutal on a campaign.

Sam Stein
Senior Politics Editor, The Huffington Post 

Jason Cherkis
Reporter, The Huffington Post


WASHINGTON -- There is a high-minded theory of politics, perpetuated by the melodramatic scripts of Aaron Sorkin, that campaigns really don't have to be such ignoble affairs. A candidate can indeed win by staying positive if their arguments are persuasive and heartfelt.

It's not a total Hollywood fantasy. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has never run a negative ad in his life. But as the Democratic Socialist is finding out in the midst of a hard fought primary, there may be a limit to a conflict-averse strategy. As any operative and campaign ad guru will tell you, going negative really does work.

In the latest episode of our "Candidate Confessional" podcast, former Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.) declared as much. He recounted an instance, during the campaign for the open Senate seat in 2014, when both he and current Senator David Perdue were trying to get the endorsement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Perdue ended up having a terrible meeting with the pro-business lobby and Kingston ultimately prevailed. Shortly thereafter, Perdue started running ads against Kingston accusing him of supporting amnesty because a group supporting him backed comprehensive immigration reform. That group was… the Chamber of Commerce. Perdue's ad was placed at roughly 3:50 p.m on Friday, just ten minutes before the deadline to place spots on air. "We could not react to it," Kingston said. "That ad could have been the difference."



________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Pretty ugly, but for the most part true. This article is short, concise, and gives an example which cost the writer an election (according to the writer).. Worth reading.