Democrats are taking the Trump threat very, very seriously. They’re right.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/03/01/democrats-are-taking-the-trump-threat-very-very-seriously-theyre-right/
All signs are that Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are headed for smashing victories today in multiple primaries across the country that could very well put both on a clear path to the nominations of their respective parties. Which means it isnt too early for Democrats to start seriously pondering how to handle Trump in the general election.
Todays New York Times delivers the most comprehensive report yet on the evolving Dem strategy. Its worth dividing the Dem approach into two categories: First, there are the attacks that are designed to tear Trump down in the eyes of core Dem constituencies (minorities, single women) and groups of gettable swing voters (suburbanites and college educated whites). This will rely heavily on attacking Trumps temperament as unfit for the presidency and deeply dangerous on a global scale; highlighting Trumps virulent xenophobia and degrading comments about immigrants, women, and Muslims; and his murky business dealings, which will be pressed into service to paint Trump as a scam artist who has fleeced working people.
You might call those the low-hanging-fruit attacks on Trump the gimmes. After all, its easy to conclude Trump is a deeply toxic figure who would drive up turnout among core Dem groups in a huge way and dramatically alienate and frighten certain swing voters. Thats very likely to happen....
This is welcome news for those who dont relish the idea of a Trump presidency. Initial reports suggested that Democrats were mostly planning to re-purpose the 2012 attacks on Mitt Romney, as a predatory capitalist, against Trump. But such an attack arguably would not be reckoning with the important differences between Romney and Trump, as well as the true sources of Trumpisms success. Romney was running (mostly) as an economic technocrat who would spur a faster recovery where Obama failed, in hopes of winning a referendum on the incumbents sluggish economy. So Dems had to use Romneys business career to viscerally undermine the notion that his approach to the economy a call for getting government out of the way that Dems branded as youre on your own economics would actually help struggling Americans.