Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

swag

(26,483 posts)
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 06:47 PM Mar 2016

Another gentle reminder re: the Supreme Court

Last edited Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:49 PM - Edit history (1)

The Supreme Court has always been a fundamental issue since I first started voting in general elections (1980, Reagan v. Carter), my side lost, Reagan gave us the profoundly foul reign of Scalia, though we half lucked out with O'Connor and Kennedy. Reagan's successor Bush the elder gave us the measured David Souter and the disastrous Thomas (I was on the steps of the US Capitol chanting, ineffectively - chanting tends to be ineffective - against his confirmation).

From Clinton, we got Ginsburg (the notorious RBG did not appear out of nowhere, Bill Clinton nominated her) and Breyer.

George W Bush, unsurprisingly, tried to give us the profoundly unqualified Harriet Miers before relenting and nominating the extreme RWNJ Sam Alito, who sealed the deal on the notorious Citizens United decision, which so many of my friends inveigh against continually, wondering what can be done, oh what can be done?

Bush also gave us the current Chief Justice John Roberts, a hero and a leader in elevating corporate rights over the rights of individuals.

Obama gave us Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, rational and empathetic justices who care about both the rule of law and about the lives of those of us who actually live here.

You have to vote not only in the generals, but also in the midterms (Ds are very poor at this) to ensure that these Supreme Court life appointees aren't the goddamned life-appointed disasters like Scalia and Thomas, you also have to vote in midterms (those two-year after presidential election things where you elect Senators and Representatives), to stop the legislative and judicial obstructionism of the intransigently moronic Republican party.

If you want Citizen's United reversed, and if you want some judicial decisions that might reflect what is good for the people (you), you might want to vote in both the general and the midterm elections for the candidate who best reflects your values and interests.

And if the GE candidate this year is not who you're supporting in the primaries this year, I'm sorry, but come out and vote in November anyway.

It's your future, not mine. I'm 54, well on to being done with this mess. The wrong Supreme Court justice can fuck things up for a lifetime.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another gentle reminder re: the Supreme Court (Original Post) swag Mar 2016 OP
you need to address this to the DNC ish of the hammer Mar 2016 #1
Be my guest. I haven't missed an election in my voting life swag Mar 2016 #3
Yeah, I'm over that 'gentle nudge' too. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2016 #2
That's a poor evaluation, but it's yours, so I redpect it. swag Mar 2016 #4
Obviously you do not respect it, or you wouldn't accuse me of having 'delusions'. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2016 #5
Bueno! swag Mar 2016 #6
George W. gave us Alito and Roberts, not H.W. WillowTree Mar 2016 #7
duh. Thanks! Typo corrected! swag Mar 2016 #8

swag

(26,483 posts)
3. Be my guest. I haven't missed an election in my voting life
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:22 PM
Mar 2016

I don't adk the DNC tobtell mecwhen to vote.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
2. Yeah, I'm over that 'gentle nudge' too.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:18 PM
Mar 2016

You want to motivate me? Get your candidate onboard with drastic measures to attempt to mediate Climate Change. With leaving oil, coal, and gas in the ground. The Supreme Court can screw over the Unites States, but Climate Change is screwing over humanity, as well as all higher lifeforms on the planet. The Supreme Court doesn't hold a candle to that.

swag

(26,483 posts)
4. That's a poor evaluation, but it's yours, so I redpect it.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:25 PM
Mar 2016

Do what you like, and if you think the Supreme Court doesn't rule on laws and regulations related to climate change, one probably cannot easily disabuse you of your delusions.

Best of luck!

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
5. Obviously you do not respect it, or you wouldn't accuse me of having 'delusions'.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:27 PM
Mar 2016

You've obviously studied how to win friends and influence people...

Off to ignore with you now.

swag

(26,483 posts)
8. duh. Thanks! Typo corrected!
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:50 PM
Mar 2016

People shouldn't be allowed to name their kids after themselves! It's so confusing!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another gentle reminder r...