Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSCOTUS rules in favor of gay (equal) rights in adoption case
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday in favor of an Alabama woman who sought legal custody after splitting up with her same-sex partner.
The case required the court to interpret the Constitution's dictate that every state must give "full faith and credit" to legal decisions reached in other states.
Two women, referred to in court documents only by their initials, were in a committed relationship in Alabama for nearly 17 years. One of them, E.L., gave birth to three children. The other, V.L., wanted to adopt them, so on the advice of a lawyer she sought and was granted full parental rights from a court in Georgia, where the laws were considered more favorable to her situation.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/supreme-court-rules-gay-adoption-case-n533256
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 681 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS rules in favor of gay (equal) rights in adoption case (Original Post)
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2016
OP
And yet again those who opposed equality, such as Hillary Clinton, are shown to have been on the
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#3
ruggerson
(17,483 posts)1. Too bad
we will be missing Scalia's incomprehensibly angry, theocratic tirade, masked as a dissent.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)2. There was no opinion...
Is that considered a per curiam decision?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)3. And yet again those who opposed equality, such as Hillary Clinton, are shown to have been on the
wrong side of history, the law and of that which is right. I am so happy that in 2008 we elected Barack Obama.
lamp_shade
(14,816 posts)4. Link here...