Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1125 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sharapova hires who???? (Original Post)
malaise
Mar 2016
OP
Well, he did do a phenomenal job lying about what the Bush misadministration was doing.
madinmaryland
Mar 2016
#8
She was taking a drug for 10 years, only supposed to be used for a few weeks.
johnnyrocket
Mar 2016
#7
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)1. Seals the deal for me...
She and Payless are guilty as hell.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)2. Hires him to do what? Is he even a lawyer?
If what Ive heard is correct she may have a good case but she's going to need competent legal representation.
Ari Fleischer is just a buffoon.
malaise
(268,930 posts)4. Didn't Manning hire him as well? n/t
malaise
(268,930 posts)5. I don't think she has a good case at all
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2016/mar/11/maria-sharapova-aura-blemish-doubts-tennis
<snip>
At Wimbledon in 2004 the teenager gave another striking response to a question posed after her semi-final. She had spent the night before the match working on a sociology essay, she said, prompting someone to ask if it took her mind off the task ahead. No, she said without hesitation, thats not how it works. When I do one thing, I concentrate on that thing. When I do the other thing, I concentrate on that.
The ability to compartmentalise her obligations must have been of enormous benefit as she navigated her way through her career on and off the court. She was always punctual, always businesslike, always focused on the task at hand, whether it be trying to beat Serena Williams or promoting Swiss watches. Which makes it all the more surprising that she should have failed to open any of the five official emails informing her that the heart medicine called meldonium or mildronate, as she knew it had been placed on the athletes banned list.
The appeal that made Sharapova the best-paid woman in world sport for 11 years in a row has always been based on paradoxes starting with the contrast between that imperious, sometimes disdainful demeanour and a glorious smile that seems to come as naturally at unguarded moments as it does during a fashion shoot. To love her, you had to ignore her habit, before receiving serve, that quite blatantly forced her opponent to wait while she stood in the back court, facing in the opposite direction, reversing the normal protocol by making the point run to the receivers rhythm. Or the way she responded to moments of difficulty in a match by raising the volume on the prolonged scream emitted after each of her raking ground strokes, a tactic surely aimed whatever she might have claimed at disrupting her opponents concentration.
There was also the invention of the Sugarpova. Surely it must say something about a woman clearly proud of her own carefully maintained body that she would exploit her fame to sell sweets to children in a world struggling to control obesity among a generation hooked on sugar.
Her own drug was unknown to most of us until this week. She took meldonium for 10 years, allegedly on prescription from her family doctor to treat a variety of ailments. But if there is one thing we know about athletes it is that even the non-cheats among them will explore any potential marginal gain in the effort to acquire an edge.
<snip>
At Wimbledon in 2004 the teenager gave another striking response to a question posed after her semi-final. She had spent the night before the match working on a sociology essay, she said, prompting someone to ask if it took her mind off the task ahead. No, she said without hesitation, thats not how it works. When I do one thing, I concentrate on that thing. When I do the other thing, I concentrate on that.
The ability to compartmentalise her obligations must have been of enormous benefit as she navigated her way through her career on and off the court. She was always punctual, always businesslike, always focused on the task at hand, whether it be trying to beat Serena Williams or promoting Swiss watches. Which makes it all the more surprising that she should have failed to open any of the five official emails informing her that the heart medicine called meldonium or mildronate, as she knew it had been placed on the athletes banned list.
The appeal that made Sharapova the best-paid woman in world sport for 11 years in a row has always been based on paradoxes starting with the contrast between that imperious, sometimes disdainful demeanour and a glorious smile that seems to come as naturally at unguarded moments as it does during a fashion shoot. To love her, you had to ignore her habit, before receiving serve, that quite blatantly forced her opponent to wait while she stood in the back court, facing in the opposite direction, reversing the normal protocol by making the point run to the receivers rhythm. Or the way she responded to moments of difficulty in a match by raising the volume on the prolonged scream emitted after each of her raking ground strokes, a tactic surely aimed whatever she might have claimed at disrupting her opponents concentration.
There was also the invention of the Sugarpova. Surely it must say something about a woman clearly proud of her own carefully maintained body that she would exploit her fame to sell sweets to children in a world struggling to control obesity among a generation hooked on sugar.
Her own drug was unknown to most of us until this week. She took meldonium for 10 years, allegedly on prescription from her family doctor to treat a variety of ailments. But if there is one thing we know about athletes it is that even the non-cheats among them will explore any potential marginal gain in the effort to acquire an edge.
madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)3. That was the first thing I thought, even before opening your thread.
malaise
(268,930 posts)6. Have to say this never crossed my mind
I thought she'd lawyer up but this scumbag????
madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)8. Well, he did do a phenomenal job lying about what the Bush misadministration was doing.
He probably can do the same thing (and it's a lot easier and much more lucrative) for sports figures.
malaise
(268,930 posts)9. True
The truth is the tennis establishment is responsible for this mess - why didn't they announce the find and the date of hearings.
johnnyrocket
(1,773 posts)7. She was taking a drug for 10 years, only supposed to be used for a few weeks.
Of course she's guilty.