Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One thing was clear tonite on MSNBC election coverage Rachel Maddow & Nicole Wallace hate each other (Original Post) TeamPooka Mar 2016 OP
Lol, noticed nt flamingdem Mar 2016 #1
missed it but I am no fan of Nicolle Wallace. riversedge Mar 2016 #2
No one is a fan of Nicole Wallace. :) nt TeamPooka Mar 2016 #5
Well hell, she is a republican Jim Beard Mar 2016 #3
Interesting....They've appeared together on MSNBC many times whathehell Mar 2016 #4
Next you're going to tell me that Jim Gilmore isn't actually her boyfriend. LeftyMom Mar 2016 #21
Uh, nope.. whathehell Mar 2016 #23
I think Rachel says a lot of things just for the fun of it... Stellar Mar 2016 #30
Gotcha, Stellar. Thanks. whathehell Mar 2016 #31
I'm out of the US right now, but I've got it on DVR...Could whathehell Mar 2016 #6
They go at it a few times. I'm sorry I can't pinpoint it for you better but TeamPooka Mar 2016 #7
Okay Team, thanks.. whathehell Mar 2016 #9
actually they are pretty good friends JI7 Mar 2016 #8
Why is Nicole Walace on TV at all? underpants Mar 2016 #10
Pretty face Cosmocat Mar 2016 #12
So we just pretend Repubs don't exist? Calista241 Mar 2016 #13
No but we already know what their stance is underpants Mar 2016 #16
I disagree. Their dogma has changed a LOT. Calista241 Mar 2016 #17
Trump is not one of the "them" Powell wrote that Hortensis Mar 2016 #18
Isn't "them" anyone who is running against us? Calista241 Mar 2016 #19
My "them" is the people behind those them. Hortensis Mar 2016 #20
She did have the opinion that Palin was terrifying as a potential vp. OhioBlue Mar 2016 #22
Yep, according to Schultz's drama about the campaign, Ilsa Mar 2016 #29
Because MSNBC is backing a Republican. floriduck Mar 2016 #28
And yet the very first time she showe up on GEM$NBComcast malaise Mar 2016 #11
Actually, they are good friends. I didn't detect in hate in their exchange, just disagreement. Meldread Mar 2016 #14
Rachel has said many times that they are friends. Greybnk48 Mar 2016 #15
I would be very surprised if that was the case. Most on screen pundits get along. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #24
m$nbc, the home of nicole wallace, hugh hewitt, steve schmidt and a whole slew of right wing nutters spanone Mar 2016 #25
thank goodness. librechik Mar 2016 #26
I haven't noticed that, but I have noticed her relationship with Brian Williams WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2016 #27

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
4. Interesting....They've appeared together on MSNBC many times
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 04:30 AM
Mar 2016

and I've heard Rachel refer to her as "my friend", but I found that rather suspect, given their very different ideologies. Love Rachel, can't stand Nicole Wallace.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
23. Uh, nope..
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 02:06 PM
Mar 2016

I guess I'm a little short on my Nicole Wallace trivia, 'cause I haven:t a clue as to what you're talking about.

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
30. I think Rachel says a lot of things just for the fun of it...
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 02:47 PM
Mar 2016

Rachel sometimes refers to Jim Gilmore as her boyfriend...in jest.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
6. I'm out of the US right now, but I've got it on DVR...Could
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 04:50 AM
Mar 2016

you do me a favor and just give me a rough sense of the time at which these two went at it?

Hate to be evil about it, but I can't stand NW and would enjoy seeing Rachel let her have it.

TeamPooka

(24,221 posts)
7. They go at it a few times. I'm sorry I can't pinpoint it for you better but
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:06 AM
Mar 2016

when you see the first one and go wow wait there's more in the next two hours at least once an hour. They mostly go at it over the classification/type of Trump voters and Nicole has to defend them of course.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
9. Okay Team, thanks..
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:34 AM
Mar 2016

I figured it might be difficult to pin down the exact time, but I appreciate your description....I'm looking forward

to watching Wallace trying to defend Trump supporters, lol.

underpants

(182,767 posts)
10. Why is Nicole Walace on TV at all?
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:56 AM
Mar 2016

She worked in the W administration and was a senior advisor on the McCain-Palin campaign. There is no reason to consider her opinion relevant.

Cosmocat

(14,563 posts)
12. Pretty face
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:25 AM
Mar 2016

And demur personality, making her toxic political views palatable at a superficial level.

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
13. So we just pretend Repubs don't exist?
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:02 AM
Mar 2016

We need to be informed, and the best way to be informed is to have the other side tell us what's going on over there.

underpants

(182,767 posts)
16. No but we already know what their stance is
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:44 AM
Mar 2016

Their dogma is clear and never changing. The only reason to have them on is for repetition.

Lewis Powell's memo of 1971 dealt with the Right's crushing defeats at the universities and how liberal professors were considered the only relevant experts on most subjects. He said they had to establish a presence to at least undercut the liberal bias. This was carried over by them as a model for their media simply to take up time and then to influence a very receptive corporate media.

http://reclaimdemocracy.org/powell_memo_lewis/

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
17. I disagree. Their dogma has changed a LOT.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 11:00 AM
Mar 2016

Trump himself has a lot of varying positions that are contrary to past Republican initiatives. His stance on trade, which is similar in many ways to Bernie's, is just one of them.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
18. Trump is not one of the "them" Powell wrote that
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 11:12 AM
Mar 2016

history-making memo for, Calista.

The Kochs and their alliance of over 700 plutocrats are the single largest ultraconservative power group, but there are others. Their stances have not changed in the least and are all some variation of increased transfer of wealth and power from us to them through dismantling of government controls and alteration of the Constitution.

Kasich and Rubio would help them achieve their goals. They are afraid they could not control Trump or Cruz. Notably, most of the conservatives backing Trump have broken out of their small-government/anti-regulation mindset, marking him and them as a severe threat to all the plots that have evolved from Lewis Powell's memo.

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
19. Isn't "them" anyone who is running against us?
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 01:53 PM
Mar 2016

In any case, we need to know whatever anyone else is planning, and I don't see a problem with being informed.

Ilsa

(61,694 posts)
29. Yep, according to Schultz's drama about the campaign,
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 02:43 PM
Mar 2016

Wallace ended up refusing to work with Palin.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
28. Because MSNBC is backing a Republican.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 02:30 PM
Mar 2016

Their second choice is Hillary. Comcast has destroyed the only reliable cable news network left, excluding RT and Al Jazeera (which is shutting down soon).

malaise

(268,924 posts)
11. And yet the very first time she showe up on GEM$NBComcast
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:00 AM
Mar 2016

she was Rachel's guest - and the second and third and fourth times as well.

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
14. Actually, they are good friends. I didn't detect in hate in their exchange, just disagreement.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:30 AM
Mar 2016

Mostly, I detected Nicole's sense that she had to defend her parents. Both of her parents are Trump supporters, and were likely blowing up her phone, "HOW COULD YOU LET THEM SAY THAT!!!1111````~~~~!"

I mean, she obviously hates Donald Trump as well. I think part of it was Nichole trying to play devils advocate and give voice to Trump supporters (mostly her parents), since there was literally no one there who would take the Trump side of an argument. Even the other Republicans who showed up were anti-Trump.

The most heated exchange that I saw was one where Nichole pushed back against Trump supporters being called "freaks" -- except no one had said that. So, Rachel (defending herself against such accusations) pointed that out. Rachel and Nichole were actually more-or-less in agreement during that exchange however, because Rachel was pointing out that if Republicans try and steal the nomination from Trump that they'd likely riot and things would become violent. I forget what Rachel called them, though, she was trying to be polite and not call them violent proto-fascists, and use some nicer term. Nichole bristled at that term, which caused the exchange, likely because she felt that it was basically someone calling her parents "freaks" -- even though that word was never used. She then went on to discuss how there would be insane backlash if the party attempted to steal the nomination from Trump... which was Rachel's point.

Greybnk48

(10,167 posts)
15. Rachel has said many times that they are friends.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:40 AM
Mar 2016

It's uncomfortable to watch them spar, but she insists they're buddies.

spanone

(135,820 posts)
25. m$nbc, the home of nicole wallace, hugh hewitt, steve schmidt and a whole slew of right wing nutters
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 02:09 PM
Mar 2016
 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
27. I haven't noticed that, but I have noticed her relationship with Brian Williams
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 02:26 PM
Mar 2016

she's a bit over-the-top supportive but it's nice to see.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One thing was clear tonit...