Fuck you Mitch McConnell .... No hearing for Obama's Supreme Court nominee, McConnell says

[Botany]

“The next justice could fundamentally alter the direction of the Supreme Court and have a profound
impact on our country, so of course the American people should have a say in the court’s direction,"
he (Mitch McConnell) said.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/273230-mcconnell-no-hearing-for-garland

The American people have already had their say in the 2012 election and President Obama
won in a landslide.

[spanone]

1. he won't recognize the Barack Obama is President. fuck him.

[RKP5637]

2. Mitch McConnell is unfit to serve, and I would say the same if he were a democrat. n/t

[Fairgo]

3. ...and?

is my terse response to McConnell. To make sense of his logic, you have to step outside of democracy.

[annabanana]

4. I'm sure he'll be delighted with the choice of the next Pres . . .

no matter who wins..

[ScreamingMeemie]

5. "The People" had a say in Obama's election, you turtle-headed nimrod.

[rock]

8. Or as I like to put it

They already did.

[surrealAmerican]

6. Is there any kind of action Democrats in the Senate could take ...

... to try to force him to hold hearings?

[SickOfTheOnePct]

11. No n/t

[WhaTHellsgoingonhere]

7. I support this LOL

I don't want an old corporate type moderate, either. And I'd rather see what happens now rather than wait for it to play out over 100 days.

Who's on deck?

Will there be any blowback? No. I want to be proven wrong. Let's see the blowback.

[pansypoo53219]

9. a pox on turtle man's soul. a pox i say.

die badly old man. and ED. may your dick fall off.

[no_hypocrisy]

10. I don't get it.

Why doesn't McConnell go through the motions of the Constitution, have the hearings, and let his republican-majority Senate keep voting down the nominee? Why refuse to even have one hearing?

[SickOfTheOnePct]

12. That's what I don't get either n/t

[Johonny]

14. The general assumption is Obama would have the votes to get a nominee through

so the only solution is total blockage. This would indicate... the GOP leadership is not in control of their caucus but we knew that already.

[Johonny]

13. When Democrats win... we need more elections as proof. When Republicans win... its a mandate.

F him.

[Doctor_J]

15. I read today on du that Obama "checkmated" the republicans.

I think that word does not mean what you think it means