General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDoes Skinner's amnesty
Mean Manny G can come back? (If he wants to). I sure hope so!! Love Manny!!!
riversedge
(70,087 posts)Renew Deal
(81,847 posts)or L00nix if they really didn't mean what was said.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)I think they mean it.
Renew Deal
(81,847 posts)And in the case of NYC_SKP he could have made a mistake.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)but I see them. Maybe they're following me.
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)A lot more it seems than just discussing the issues.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)They've been banned.
I guess that news wasn't important enough to hit reddit.
merrily
(45,251 posts)NYC said he was mocking a newbie troll--never meant it as it was taken to begin with.
None of that matters anyway, because I very much doubt Skinner will reconsider. I don't know if anyone has asked for reconsideration.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Isn't he back under a sock?
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Andy823
(11,495 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)amnesty. Can't believe I posted that.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,781 posts)Manny & NYC_Skip are still banned. The amnesty is only for those with 5 hides. The PPRd remain banned.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Accounts supposed under review for months are still "under review." Or so the profiles say. Must be a hell of a review.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,781 posts)So, please, do the right thing when serving and let's clean this place up a bit.
We've also decided to try removing the current "five hides and you're out" restriction, mainly because we suspect that members would be more likely to vote to hide bad behavior if they didn't feel like one of their friends might get canned over it. So while members can still be flagged for review for getting posts hidden too quickly, there's no more five-hide suspension. And anyone who is currently suspended for getting five hides is able to post again as of now. We reserve the right to change this decision if it seems like it's having the opposite effect to what was intended.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1013&pid=5098
merrily
(45,251 posts)whose accounts have been allegedly "under review" for months. That was for your information and for the information of anyone reading this thread.
Thank you for quoting Skinner's post, but I read it when it went up. I'm saying there are, as a matter of fact, apparently exceptions that his post did not describe.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,781 posts)My takeaway from the Skinner quote is that those currently and in the future to be "under review" could be there for a while.
I will be first to tell you that I am not one of the DUers plugged into who-posted-what-and-when, so I really don't know why a decision could take a long time.
merrily
(45,251 posts)welcomed back, except he is not a Hillary supporter. I don't know if there are others. He is the only one pointed out to me. (I am not much for tracking this stuff myself.)
Reviewing an account does not take months. When things get to that point, the poster is, for all practical purposes, banned, without coming out and saying that.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)choie
(4,107 posts)dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)names).
vkkv
(3,384 posts)Good reads link:::
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1016
leveymg
(36,418 posts)In the meantime, I'll keep on feeding and letting the fly sleep at the foot of the bed. Maybe, I'll keep it.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)PPRs are not timeouts.
The Administration has stated before that they will examine requests to reverse a PPR decision on a case by case basis, so those who have been banned and wish to return should make their case via email to the admins. IF they receive no response, the answer is no (the administrators reserve the right to ignore any request to restore a banned account).
MerryBlooms
(11,757 posts)Amnesty is being applied to folks who have 5 or more hides (no matter how many times) and were restricted from posting (but a time out never prevented from sending pm or rec). Amnesty does not include folks who have been banned.
Orrex
(63,172 posts)Mean Walt Starr can come back?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Every time I read about that one, I have to laugh at both the poster and Skinner.
Orrex
(63,172 posts)A magnificent moment in DU history!
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I was sorry to see him go.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)It's one thing to debate within the Democratic party. It's another to advocate against the Democratic party. If there's a libertarian or independent message board out there, then those banned posters should be there.
merrily
(45,251 posts)of some purist posters.
Even the post that got him banned was technically within the rules applicable to primary posting.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)Have a lovely day!
merrily
(45,251 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Or they did, maybe that too has changed.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Whether there was further discussion beyond what Skinner posted, I have no idea, but I think MIRT has the final word over banning low count posters.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)before he issued his so-called "amnesty"
I'M STILL WAITING FOR MY AMNESTY, SKINNER! WHEN IS IT GOING TO HAPPEN???
Oh, what? Wait! That's right... I'm a Bernie supporter. I won't hold my breath for equality & justice from a 3rd-Way conservative Hillary supporter. WHAT AM I THINKING?!!!
pintobean
(18,101 posts)It doesn't erase hidden posts. Did you bother to read the announcement?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1013&pid=5098
PufPuf23
(8,755 posts)who prefer mockery to providing discourse or content.
The ownership of DU has favorites and that is their right.
I am already looking forward to the POTUS cycle in 2020 myself in hope that it may be more productive.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)JI7
(89,240 posts)RandiFan1290
(6,221 posts)over and over and over and over...