Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,824 posts)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:00 PM Mar 2016

Alabama 'Personhood' Proposal Would Effectively Ban Abortion

Source: Associated Press

Alabama 'Personhood' Proposal Would Effectively Ban Abortion

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
MONTGOMERY, Ala. — Mar 23, 2016, 1:43 PM ET

A proposed Alabama constitutional amendment would legally define a fetus as a person from the moment of fertilization, effectively banning abortion in the state.

The state House Health Committee on Wednesday heard testimony about it, though lawmakers didn't vote on the amendment. Similar proposals in other states have failed to win federal court approval.

Supporters of the bill, sponsored by Republican Rep. Ed Henry, asked the committee to allow Alabama citizens to vote on the issue.

Dr. Jim Belyew, an OB/GYN who spoke in support of the bill, says a baby is a "new person" and is "totally separate" from the mother. The mother "only contributes the egg and the incubator," Belyew said.

Brock Boone, an ACLU lawyer, called the bill an "attack on women."


http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/alabama-personhood-proposal-effectively-ban-abortion-37873288
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alabama 'Personhood' Proposal Would Effectively Ban Abortion (Original Post) Eugene Mar 2016 OP
They choose to believe in the physically impossible. dchill Mar 2016 #1
I say fight fire with fire meow2u3 Mar 2016 #2
Well....... Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2016 #3
Aren't most fertilized eggs flushed out during menstruation? arely staircase Mar 2016 #4
That would also ban some forms of birth control Bettie Mar 2016 #5
we need to do better runaway hero Mar 2016 #6
Fertilization Certificates rather than Birth Certificates. Downwinder Mar 2016 #7

meow2u3

(24,761 posts)
2. I say fight fire with fire
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:09 PM
Mar 2016

A clever Democrat ought to amend those "personhood" bills to mean only natural persons count as persons in the eyes of the law. This would eliminate the idea that craporations are people.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,396 posts)
3. Well.......
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:11 PM
Mar 2016

If a "baby" requires an incubator (aka mother/human female) to sustain itself for a period of time, then it's not quite its own person yet JMHO. Nevermind the fact that this proposal flies smacklong into Roe v. Wade but does Alabama also propose to allow women to claim public assistance and other financial benefits for women while the "baby" is still inside of them being incubated? Does the proposal call for a change in the calculation of the "baby's" age? Maybe they will start celebrating "Fertilization Days" instead of birthdays?

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
4. Aren't most fertilized eggs flushed out during menstruation?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:14 PM
Mar 2016

Are we to consider those miscarriages now? Or even similar to the loss of a child?

Bettie

(16,079 posts)
5. That would also ban some forms of birth control
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:18 PM
Mar 2016

but, I doubt it will get through the process or survive the courts.

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
7. Fertilization Certificates rather than Birth Certificates.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:24 PM
Mar 2016

Then we all have to prove up for new IDs. In that case I am not sure that I can prove that I exist. All involved parties are deceased.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alabama 'Personhood' Prop...