Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

monicaangela

(1,508 posts)
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:08 AM Mar 2016

High Court Asks Administration to Weigh in on Predatory Lending Case

A SUPREME COURT order this week forces the Obama administration to make a decision: either save consumers tens of billions of dollars at the expense of debt collectors, car loan specialists, and student lenders, or defend those financial entities.

In a one-line order, the justices on Monday asked Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, the legal representative for the federal government in Supreme Court matters, to file a brief in the case of Madden v. Midland Funding, “expressing the views of the United States.”

In Madden, a class-action case, borrowers argued that loans sold by a bank to a debt collector should be subject to the usury law in New York state, which limits the interest rate that can be charged. The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, and Midland Funding appealed to the Supreme Court. Legal experts are following the case closely, since it could, after nearly 40 years, herald a return to prominence for state-based usury laws, a key safeguard against predatory lending.

https://theintercept.com/2016/03/24/high-court-asks-administration-to-weigh-in-on-predatory-lending-case/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
High Court Asks Administration to Weigh in on Predatory Lending Case (Original Post) monicaangela Mar 2016 OP
It will be interesting to see what the "progressive" Obama does. We know which side of this rhett o rick Mar 2016 #1
Exactly monicaangela Mar 2016 #4
K&R I wonder which side the administration will take? LiberalArkie Mar 2016 #2
The way things have been going lately monicaangela Mar 2016 #3
The fact there is even a question about it says it all to me. CharlotteVale Mar 2016 #5
Exactly monicaangela Mar 2016 #7
Boy Howdy... THERE'S one to watch. annabanana Mar 2016 #6
Yes we should, and be pissed if we don't get the correct response. monicaangela Mar 2016 #8
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
1. It will be interesting to see what the "progressive" Obama does. We know which side of this
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:54 AM
Mar 2016

issue Clinton and DINO Debbie stand, the corporate side.

monicaangela

(1,508 posts)
4. Exactly
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 04:07 PM
Mar 2016

If President Obama elects to go with the corporations over the people, it will be bad for his legacy. Even knowing that, I really am not sure which way he will go. I sure hope he doesn't let the people down and elect to go with the plutocrats.

monicaangela

(1,508 posts)
7. Exactly
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:51 PM
Mar 2016

They shouldn't even have to ask. And, the response should have been immediate. I'm thinking why would anybody need to even think about this, especially the administration. The question seems to be, are you for allowing predatory lending or not. The answer should be a resounding NO. IMHO of course.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»High Court Asks Administr...