Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

onehandle

(51,122 posts) Tue May 31, 2016, 08:51 PM May 2016

Ralph Nader Coming Up On MSNBC Right Now!

Click. Off.

Thanks for Bush, Ralph.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ralph Nader Coming Up On MSNBC Right Now! (Original Post) onehandle May 2016 OP

Thank you for the warning! bravenak May 2016 #1

Fuck Ralph Nader...That is all sharp_stick May 2016 #2

Fuck that POS. woolldog May 2016 #3

Which Bush? Octafish May 2016 #4

Oh bo-oy. tavernier May 2016 #5

bravenak

(34,648 posts)

1. Thank you for the warning!

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 08:56 PM

May 2016

You saved my mind.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)

2. Fuck Ralph Nader...That is all

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 08:59 PM

May 2016

woolldog

(8,791 posts)

3. Fuck that POS.

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 08:59 PM

May 2016

Go to hell Nader.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)

4. Which Bush?

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 09:02 PM

May 2016

The first one?

Bill Clinton let him off the hook for lying America into war in Iraq, Iran Contra treason, BCCI treason, the S&L disaster and the Safari Club sinking Jimmy Carter.

The second one?

Barack Obama let him off for lying America into war in Iraq, the unconstitutional domestic spy operation, the Bankster bailout disaster, and a bunch more.

Don't know, as he isn't president, but going from his life's record, I think Ralph Nader would have put them in jail.

tavernier

(12,368 posts)

5. Oh bo-oy.

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 09:04 PM

May 2016

Reply to this discussion