General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan someone tell me what The Council on Foreign Relations actually does?...There's so
much confusion and conspiracy nut stuff on the Internet
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)Alex4Martinez
(2,193 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The notion of people with recognized expertise in a subject having an organization which promotes communication, conferences and publications on ideas about that subject, normally bothers people lacking that expertise.
Personally, I think the dentists are up to no good.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Iggo
(47,546 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)They are a self-perpetuating group who generally support the status quo on foreign policy for the United States. People who work (diplomats, elected politicians, academics, some military) in that area and are moderate in their views will be encouraged to associate with it. It's a think tank, not controlled by anyone in particular, but supported by people who want international stability.
If you want stability in world affairs, it's a useful institution. If you think radical change is needed, it would be something that blocks that.
clarice
(5,504 posts)this is a non-elected group, with no over site, hobnobbing around influencing
our foreign policy.... and I can't seem to figure out WHO asked them to do so.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)Stability often depends on people with experience being listened to. It may be notable that it was founded shortly after the First World War; diplomats may have felt they should have analysed the situation better, and that they might have been able to defuse the arguments that led to the war.
clarice
(5,504 posts)It seems to me, as I learn more about them, that this is the antithesis of Democracy.
Am I way off base?
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)They're not a democratic institution, no; but they've never claimed to be. Universities aren't democracies either, but they also contain people with expertise, who express views on complicated subjects, and are often listened to by people who value conventional thinking. They're a 'think tank'. They don't have power.
clarice
(5,504 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)The New York Times has influence. Chambers of Commerce have influence. NGOs have influence. Those with power will often listen to some of these.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Bucky
(53,986 posts)From Wikipedia:
The CFR started a program in 2008 to last for 5 years and funded by a grant from the Robina Foundation called "International Institutions and Global Governance" which aims to identify the institutional requirements for effective multilateral cooperation in the 21st century.
The CFR's Maurice C. Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies, directed by scholar and author Sebastian Mallaby, works to promote a better understanding among policymakers, academic specialists, and the interested public of how economic and political forces interact to influence world affairs.
The CFR's Center for Preventive Action (CPA) seeks to help prevent, defuse, or resolve deadly conflicts around the world and to expand the body of knowledge on conflict prevention. It does so by creating a forum in which representatives of governments, international organizations, nongovernmental organizations, corporations, and civil society can gather to develop operational and timely strategies for promoting peace in specific conflict situations.
The council publishes Foreign Affairs, "the preeminent journal of international affairs and U.S. foreign policy". It also establishes independent task forces, which bring together experts with diverse backgrounds and expertise to work together to produce reports offering both findings and policy prescriptions on important foreign policy topics. The CFR has sponsored more than fifty reports, including the Independent Task Force on the Future of North America that published report No, 53, titled Building a North American Community, in May 2005.
NewsCenter28
(1,835 posts)Just normal people like you or I who happen to have a distinguished background or interest in foreign affairs. These are good guys unlike AIPAC, PNAC, or the Foundation for the Defence of Democracies, which are full of neocon hacks.
Bucky
(53,986 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)is a far cry from "advising" on our Foreign relationships. Dont'cha think?
clarice
(5,504 posts)"evaluations" printed on the front page of every journal in America?
Bucky
(53,986 posts)Who elected the Sierra Club? Who elected the Jaycees? Who elected the AMA?
A democracy is going to be riddled with interest groups and professional associations promoting their view of the public interest.
clarice
(5,504 posts)but the members of the groups that you mentioned do not have as much influence
on something as serious as Foreign relations. When this group "entertains" members of foreign
regimes...you and I will never be sure of exactly what the hell they are promoting.
Shandris
(3,447 posts)...seem to share memberships in many different odd, 'secret' societies that are also likewise completely harmless (even when they sacrifice children in effigy, because that's what well-adjusted old rich adults do in their spare time) where they meet and talk about important things like absolutely nothing whatsoever that can in any way be construed in any manner as being political in any form for long hours.
Why, what else did you think they did?
clarice
(5,504 posts)preparing the way for the Old Ones.
maxrandb
(15,316 posts)either that, or they are the ones that can hook you up with a Russian bride.
When I was on active duty, we gave briefs on occasion to these folks, and for the most part, they were former military, political or foreign service folks, but they definitely had a "rightwing" aura about them.
They also seem to have a great deal of influence for a council that exists nowhere in the Constitution of the United States or has any type of Congressional or Administrative oversight.
Frankly, they should scare the Teabaggers way more than the UN does.
clarice
(5,504 posts)I think that people on BOTH sides should be alarmed.
maxrandb
(15,316 posts)They are definitely influential and powerful. I saw Flag Officers damn near piss their pants getting ready to brief CFR members.
Their ties to large corporations should scare the hell out of folks too.
Something tells me that Ford and Rockefeller didn't establish this think tank because the voice of Middle America needed representation at the table.
I think it goes back to the era where the rich and powerful played real games of Risk and Stratego...and I don't think much has changed
clarice
(5,504 posts)Response to clarice (Original post)
Turbineguy This message was self-deleted by its author.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Response to clarice (Reply #32)
Turbineguy This message was self-deleted by its author.
clarice
(5,504 posts)GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Just a hint... Go to any RW conspiracy site and the CFR is one of their biggest boogie men. You have wondered into the CT zone, please exit quickly.
clarice
(5,504 posts)GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)CT is used here from time to time.