Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nation's largest health insurer dropping out of the ACA in California (Original Post) GummyBearz Jun 2016 OP
Another failing of the ACA. Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #1
No thanks n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2016 #3
And exactly HOW would you compel a public company to participate in a Government program?nt clarice Jun 2016 #5
The same way that all doctors are forced to accept Medicare SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2016 #8
Exactly.nt clarice Jun 2016 #9
Maybe the same way all private citizens are compelled to buy insurance from a public company? bluesbassman Jun 2016 #13
Right....like the millions of middle class tax payers who are having to foot the bill.nt clarice Jun 2016 #15
Not really sure what you're referring to there. bluesbassman Jun 2016 #17
ummmm.... ok.nt clarice Jun 2016 #18
AGREED! yourpaljoey Jun 2016 #27
The same way the LAW required this citizen to purchase their products. Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #21
Won't have much of an impact SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2016 #2
The first domino doesn't have much of an impact until the next 200 get knocked down GummyBearz Jun 2016 #23
This is the first year SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2016 #24
The other 199 dominos were standing up before one was knocked over GummyBearz Jun 2016 #25
Yes, all of the companies could pull out of CA SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2016 #28
When the biggest health insurer does some analysis and decides dropping out is better... GummyBearz Jun 2016 #32
"This is the first year" yeah well this is the Biggest Domino. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #29
How is this the "Biggest Domino" in CA? n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2016 #30
"Nation's largest health insurer dropping out of the ACA in California" cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #31
Well, since the entire thread is about CA SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2016 #33
If "one" could read the post I was replying to, no assumption would be necessary. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #34
Good info. If that is all they have, no wonder they are dropping out. Hoyt Jun 2016 #35
There is going to be more and more of this I'm afraid. nt clarice Jun 2016 #4
Time for the Public Option yodermon Jun 2016 #6
I've always thought that the term "single payer" is incongruous... clarice Jun 2016 #11
This is true, and I don't think it's a widely understood term in the general public. yodermon Jun 2016 #16
YUP !!!! nt clarice Jun 2016 #19
Single payer or "payor" is a Canadian term. roamer65 Jun 2016 #36
the next step toward single payer! KG Jun 2016 #7
Do you get all of your news from far right/libertarian websites? geek tragedy Jun 2016 #10
Why does it matter what the source is SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2016 #12
because generally it's bad practice to use rightwing websites here. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #14
Plus linking to then makes them money Lee-Lee Jun 2016 #20
I didn't know anything about the site GummyBearz Jun 2016 #22
I don't have United Health but they're a shitstorm. I'm glad they're leaving CA underthematrix Jun 2016 #26
K&R a 5th rec for publicity Jeffersons Ghost Jun 2016 #37

bluesbassman

(19,358 posts)
13. Maybe the same way all private citizens are compelled to buy insurance from a public company?
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:13 PM
Jun 2016

Oh wait, that's right, mandates are just for those that can't afford lobbyists.

bluesbassman

(19,358 posts)
17. Not really sure what you're referring to there.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:24 PM
Jun 2016

Fret not though, there won't be a middle class much longer and then you can decry the terrible burden placed on the wealthy as they struggle to support the teaming masses of poor formerly known as middle class.

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
21. The same way the LAW required this citizen to purchase their products.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 07:32 PM
Jun 2016

It's really not hard. You just gotta get past the corporate bullshit the corporate politicians have been pushing on us.

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
23. The first domino doesn't have much of an impact until the next 200 get knocked down
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:03 PM
Jun 2016

That is when you can look back and see the impact of 1 domino

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
24. This is the first year
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:06 PM
Jun 2016

that UnitedHealth even participated in the CA exchanges, and they were limited by the state as to where they could offer policies.

The CA exchange was doing fine before UnitedHealth joined, and they'll do fine without them.

If BlueCross were to drop out, that would be a different story.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
28. Yes, all of the companies could pull out of CA
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:33 PM
Jun 2016

And monkeys could fly out of my butt too, but I'm not betting that will happen.

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
32. When the biggest health insurer does some analysis and decides dropping out is better...
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:46 PM
Jun 2016

others will drop out as well. And that will probably happen sooner than monkeys fly out of your butt. Unless you are into some weird kinky shit I have never imagined

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
31. "Nation's largest health insurer dropping out of the ACA in California"
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:40 PM
Jun 2016

Who the hell said anything about it being the biggest in CA?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
33. Well, since the entire thread is about CA
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:06 PM
Jun 2016

...why the hell wouldn't one assume that's what you're talking about?

This will no impact on CA at all.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
34. If "one" could read the post I was replying to, no assumption would be necessary.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:07 PM
Jun 2016

Shall I post the title of the thread for you again?

 

clarice

(5,504 posts)
11. I've always thought that the term "single payer" is incongruous...
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:10 PM
Jun 2016

In reality...there will be MANY working people paying the bill.

yodermon

(6,143 posts)
16. This is true, and I don't think it's a widely understood term in the general public.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:17 PM
Jun 2016

Simple "Public Health Insurance" maybe?
I'd avoid "Government" or "National" because those terms have been given unfair baggage by the right wing IMO.

roamer65

(36,744 posts)
36. Single payer or "payor" is a Canadian term.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 11:14 PM
Jun 2016

Most hospitals and clinics in Canada are privately owned, but receive reimbursement from only one insurer. That insurer is the respective provincial government.

If we were to go to a "Medicare for all", we would be hybrid between the Canadian and British systems. Private hospitals and clinics, yet a single insurer at the federal level.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
10. Do you get all of your news from far right/libertarian websites?
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:10 PM
Jun 2016
http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org/who-we-are/

Nick Sorrentino is the co-founder and editor of AgainstCronyCapitalism.org. A political and communications consultant whose clients have spanned the political spectrum, his work has been featured at Chief Executive Magazine, Breitbart, Reason.com, NPR.com, Townhall, The Daily Caller, and many other publications. He has spoken at CPAC, The Commit Forum, The Atlas Summit, The US Chamber of Commerce, The National Press Club, and at other venues. Sorrentino is the CEO of Exelorix Consultants and a senior fellow at Future 500. A graduate of Mary Washington College he lives just outside of Washington DC where he can keep an eye on Leviathan.

Hunter Lewis is co-founder of AgainstCronyCapitalism.org. He is co-founder and former CEO of global investment firm Cambridge Associates, LLC and author of 9 books on moral philosophy, psychology, and economics, including the widely acclaimed Are the Rich Necessary? (“Highly provocative and highly pleasurable.”—New York Times) He has contributed to the New York Times, the Times of London, the Washing­ton Post, and the Atlantic Monthly, as well as numerous websites such as Breitbart.com, Forbes.com, Fox.com, RealClearMarkets.com, and Townhall.com. His most recent books are Crony Capitalism in America: 2008–2012, Free Prices Now! Fixing the Economy by Abolishing the Fed, and Where Keynes Went Wrong: And Why Governments Keep Creating Inflation, Bubbles, and Busts. He has served on boards and committees of fifteen leading not-for-profit organizations, including environmental, teaching, research, and cultural and global development organizations, as well as the World Bank.
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
14. because generally it's bad practice to use rightwing websites here.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:15 PM
Jun 2016

even if the news is accurate, don't mainstream and legitimize wingnut propaganda outlets

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
20. Plus linking to then makes them money
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:32 PM
Jun 2016

Every person who follows a link there generates ad revenue for them.

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
22. I didn't know anything about the site
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 07:58 PM
Jun 2016

I noticed its title was "againstcronycapitalism" and it was a .org. That didn't give me any red flags. Thanks for vetting it so thoroughly, feel free to read the same article on a different website and then contribute something of value on the topic of my thread.

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
26. I don't have United Health but they're a shitstorm. I'm glad they're leaving CA
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:16 PM
Jun 2016

I imagine Kaiser and Anthem Blue Cross (my provider) pushed them out.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nation's largest health i...