General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFLORIDA A.G. CEASED INVESTIGATING TRUMP UNIVERSITY AFTER TRUMP DONATED TO HER
http://theintellectualist.co/florida-a-g-ceased-investigating-trump-university-after-trump-donated-to-her/lpbk2713
(42,753 posts)Buttered ... check.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)their corrupt pie holes. Pam Bondi didn't have to and she knew it.
think
(11,641 posts)Hillary has taken from mega banks and corporations that spend billions lobbying our govt. That's cold hard cash in her pocket not just campaign donations.
It's a very legitimate concern and it dwarfs the $25,000 donation Trump made in this case.
Kingofalldems
(38,451 posts)FighttheFuture
(1,313 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Democat
(11,617 posts)Your life will be far worse under Trump than Clinton.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Democat
(11,617 posts)If you prefer Trump to Clinton, you'll be gone soon enough.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)There are choices in life.
Skittles
(153,150 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Democat
(11,617 posts)Bashing Clinton here serves no purpose other than to minimize Trump's crimes.
You are doing the work of Trump supporters.
think
(11,641 posts)away with it which is most likely because soft corruption is legal and hard corruption would be hard to prove.
This isn't breaking news and there is no investigation unfortunately:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/os-pam-bondi-donald-trump-scott-maxwell-20160402-column.html
Sucks doesn't it.....
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Sounds like you have watched too many of Bernie's ads attacking Hillary.
think
(11,641 posts)money.
By William K. Black
Prof; Econ & Law, UMKC. Financial regulator. White-collar criminologist. Founding member, Bank Whistleblowers United. Author: The Best Way to Rob a Bank is to Own One. - 02/04/2016 11:55 pm ET | Updated Feb 05, 2016
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in her debate with Senator Sanders minutes ago, said that she went to Wall Street and told them to stop their shenanigans. The context was that she was being asked to respond to the complaint that she was too close to on Wall Street billionaires. She had every incentive, therefore, to demonstrate how tough she would be on Wall Street.
In that context, the best she could muster was the pusillanimous shenanigans. Here is a typical definition of that word with examples.
1. : a devious trick used especially for an underhand purpose
2. 2a : tricky or questionable practices or conduct usually used in pluralb : high-spirited or mischievous activity usually used in plural
Examples of SHENANIGAN
1. students engaging in youthful shenanigans on the last day of school
2. an act of vandalism that went way beyond the usual shenanigans at summer camp
Hillary cannot bring herself to use the f word in the context of Wall Street CEOs leading the largest and most destructive fraud epidemics in history - frauds that made them spectacularly wealthy. A few minutes later, Bernie said that fraud was Wall Streets business model.
Read more:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-k-black/hillary-the-banksters-com_b_9164930.html
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)It was Bernie who voted to deregulated derivatives, which is what really brought down the economy.
Why are you shitting on a thread pointing out Trump's obvious quid pro quo with Bondi and turning it into another GDP Hillary attack thread, when Hillary has nothing to do with this story?
You are only helping Trump by changing the subject to attack Hillary.
think
(11,641 posts)And I showed that Hillary is siding with these corrupt banks and you chose to ignore it.
Trump sucks and the $25,000 donation looks bad but like Hillary go ahead and prove that there's a quid quo pro.
I believe there was a quid pro quo but the GOP will use the same "prove it" crap Hillary supporters use.
Speaking of looking like a quid pro quo here's a great one by Hlllary and Bill. But hahaha you can't PROVE anything..:
CONOR FRIEDERSDORF JUL 31, 2015
The Wall Street Journals eyebrow-raising story of how the presidential candidate and her husband accepted cash from UBS without any regard for the appearance of impropriety that it created.
~Snip~
The article adds that there is no evidence of any link between Mrs. Clintons involvement in the case and the banks donations to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, or its hiring of Mr. Clinton. Maybe its all a mere coincidence, and when UBS agreed to pay Bill Clinton $1.5 million the relevant decision-maker wasnt even aware of the vast sum his wife may have saved the bank or the power that she will potentially wield after the 2016 presidential election.
But even that wouldnt make accepting the $1.5 million excusable.
If youre Bill Clinton and your wife has recently intervened, in her capacity as a cabinet secretary, to help a giant corporation avert a significant threat to its bottom-line, the very least you could do, if only to avoid the appearance of impropriety, is to avoid negotiating seven-figure paydays with that same corporation. This is particularly jaw-dropping because ultra-wealthy Bill Clinton has virtually unlimited opportunities to give lucrative speeches to any number of audiences not directly implicated by decisions that his wife made as secretary of state.
Read more:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then-it-pays-bill-15-million-in-speaking-fees/400067/
WhiteTara
(29,703 posts)legislation. However, he hasn't and now he's "too busy campaigning" to do anything else.
think
(11,641 posts)Anyone who's ever heard of Bernie Sanders knows this.
Hillary just take their millions and tells the to "cut it out"....
think
(11,641 posts)Wednesday, 20 January 2016 00:00
By The Daily Take Team, The Thom Hartmann Program | Op-Ed
~Snip~
The CFMA had been shoved into an omnibus spending bill at the last minute as part of a deal between Republicans and President Bill Clinton, and because this was a time when, you know, Congress actually did its job, Sanders bit the bullet and voted for the whole package - CFMA included - to keep the government open.
Only four members of Congress ended up opposing the final spending bill that included the CFMA, and one of them was Ron Paul, who opposed pretty much every spending bill. But that's just of the tip of the iceberg when it comes to how dishonest Clinton was being when she called Bernie out for voting for the CFMA.
Even if Bernie had a good reason to vote for that omnibus spending bill - like preventing a government shutdown - Sanders was angry that he been forced into deregulating Wall Street.
~Snip~
During his time at the Treasury, Gensler had pushed hard for Wall Street deregulation and even helped write the CFMA, something now-Senator Bernie Sanders found unacceptable. And so Bernie moved to block Gensler's nomination. Sanders explained his actions during an appearance on Democracy Now.
Although Sanders did succeed in blocking Gensler's nomination, the victory was short-lived: The hold was only temporary, and the Senate ended up approving Gensler as head of the CFTC on March 16, 2009. He held that post until 2014, when he was succeeded by Timothy Massad.
So what's Gary Gensler - the guy who promoted the CFMA - up to today? Oh, you know, nothing big. He's just the chief financial officer of the Hillary Clinton campaign.
Yep, that's right, the CFO of the Hillary Clinton Campaign!
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/34497-the-most-disingenuous-attack-on-bernie-yet
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Sanders lost. He is 838 delegates away from securing the nomination. Hillary is only 70 delegates away. If she doesn't clinch it this weekend in the Puerto Rico and US Virgin Islands, then it will certainly happen by 8 pm EST this Tuesday, when New Jersey is called for Hillary, 3 hours before the polls close in California. That is reality. Given reality, we need to move on and unify against Trump. Training your hate on Hillary instead of Trump only helps Trump.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)If we had the right nominee, the above would not be a problem. Trump as a "fear" is an HRC creation. Trump and the Republicans WANT to run against her.
The Rs got the memo,all the way up to poor Paul Ryan, that the base was sick of the status quo Establishment. It's going to be much more painful, it seems, for the Ds.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)It is a fascinating study in political science/sociology. And even more so from a Democratic viewpoint...I really didn't mean to pick on you at that moment. Sorry.
sendero
(28,552 posts)...is a joke of a band aid but surely you know that. A bunch of micro-managing rules and paperwork that will be ineffective in place of simply REINSTATING GLASS-STEGALL that would immediately force the banks to stop gambling with the public's money.
Is what Trump did "soft corruption"? Of course it is. And the FAILURE of our legislature to deal with the banksters is soft corruption on a scale Trump could only dream of, so excuse me if my poutrage meter doesn't even move for this one.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)And he is right about that, at least with regard to banks whose financial position poses a threat to the economy. Dodd Frank is a powerful law that does more than Glass-Stegall.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)For example: Sanders had a history of opposing bonuses for Lockheed Martin executives for a while, and his supporters like to point to this example of the Senator standing up to big business and corporate bonuses. The problem is, Sanders very quietly has come around to being a supporter of Lockheed Martin. Theres some shady history involving Sanders denial of being aware of certain deals taking shape between the new Burlington, VT, mayor (recall Burlington is where Sanders got his own start) and Lockheed. Yet somehow, both the Burlington mayor and Senator Sanders were simultaneously working out deals with the company for building and expanding in Vermont. What a nice little coincidence.
yardwork
(61,588 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Personally I hope they do find evidence of a quid pro quo between Trump and Bondi. But since this has been in the news for months and there is no investigation it's likely it will just be considered more soft corruption that is ethically questionable but is legal under current laws.
Sucks doesn't it....
And that's why it was legal for the Clinton's to do this:
CONOR FRIEDERSDORF JUL 31, 2015
The Wall Street Journals eyebrow-raising story of how the presidential candidate and her husband accepted cash from UBS without any regard for the appearance of impropriety that it created.
~Snip~
The article adds that there is no evidence of any link between Mrs. Clintons involvement in the case and the banks donations to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, or its hiring of Mr. Clinton. Maybe its all a mere coincidence, and when UBS agreed to pay Bill Clinton $1.5 million the relevant decision-maker wasnt even aware of the vast sum his wife may have saved the bank or the power that she will potentially wield after the 2016 presidential election.
But even that wouldnt make accepting the $1.5 million excusable.
If youre Bill Clinton and your wife has recently intervened, in her capacity as a cabinet secretary, to help a giant corporation avert a significant threat to its bottom-line, the very least you could do, if only to avoid the appearance of impropriety, is to avoid negotiating seven-figure paydays with that same corporation. This is particularly jaw-dropping because ultra-wealthy Bill Clinton has virtually unlimited opportunities to give lucrative speeches to any number of audiences not directly implicated by decisions that his wife made as secretary of state.
Read more:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then-it-pays-bill-15-million-in-speaking-fees/400067/
So no. Hillary didn't take any bribes. She just did things without being told that a bank wanted to have happen to save the bank a lot of money. And coincidentally Bill Clinton gets paid $1.5 million shortly there after to speak to that same bank. The bank then also donated more to the Clinton's foundation as well..
basselope
(2,565 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)think
(11,641 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)think
(11,641 posts)can't be proven what he did should be illegal and he should be prosecuted.
Blatant conflicts of interests suck and shouldn't be allowed in any form.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Over on GD: Primates you can participate in any number of poo throwing threads bashing Hillary for being bought and paid for by Goldman/Sachs to her meatloaf recipes in her damn emails.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,451 posts)This has legs.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Never seen anything like it, it is as if they realize living in a plutocracy has advantages if you one of the Haves.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)There's no proof of a quid pro quo here, is there? Just because you'd have to be horribly naive not to believe there;s a quid pro quo is not proof that there actually was a quid pro quo. As sophomoric second-year law students like to remind us, the law requires proof. Even the Supreme Shysters claimed that this kind of behavior doesn't allow one to conclude that there is even the appearance of impropriety. Wherever I or anyone else brought up this issue where it concerned a certain other candidate for president who, like Ms. Bondi, was on the receiving end of the deal and suggested that candidate was corrupt, we were accused of "smearing" that candidate and that we had no proof that she was corrupt.
So please, let's not rush to any judgments about Ms. Bondi's ethics.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)It looks like it came directly from someone's defense of Clinton.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts). . . just isn't any fun.
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)The Trifecta of entitlement in a state that has shown strong preferences for white privilege.
timdog44
(1,388 posts)That the Koch bros and their ilk are overpaying. They obviously don't realize how cheap a lot of repug politicians really are.
UCmeNdc
(9,600 posts)The bribe was in.
Democat
(11,617 posts)"But Clinton is worse". Watch for the mention of Vince Foster, coming soon.
Can't wait until the day they are banned from DU!
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)Bondi isn't the only official that's dropped a probe...
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/texas-regulator-says-ordered-drop-fraud-investigation-trump-university-over-politics
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)do it too.
IronLionZion
(45,427 posts)and many billionaires are willing to pay the price!
Matt_R
(456 posts)Are you telling us that corrupt politicians are corrupt????? That Millionaires and Billionaires are paying off Investigators????
When will Clinton release the Transcripts.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)It's so difficult to keep up with trends on the DU, this is such a mercurial place what's in and what's out can change with only the change of a name or even a single letter.
Of course I can see how an immense sum like $25,000 could cause the recipient's opinion to change, after all that is almost six months salary for a median wage worker
barbtries
(28,787 posts)so corrupt.
Ilsa
(61,694 posts)rockfordfile
(8,702 posts)Bondi is not only a dirty republican and she is a bigot with the rest of her far right republicans .