General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTransgender track athlete makes history as controversy swirls around her
http://usatodayhss.com/2016/transgender-track-athlete-makes-history-as-controversy-stirs-around-herAlaska Family Action president Jim Minnery and a dozen supporters of his conservative group gathered outside the state track meet to protest an 18-year-old who was trying to live her life, according to multiple local media reports.
We are here today as a voice from the community to ensure that female athletes are not denied the playing opportunities and scholarships otherwise available to them and to make the playing field even again, Minnery said during a press conference at the state meet, per the Alaska Dispatch News. Allowing students to play on teams of the opposite sex disproportionately impacts female students, who will lose spots on track, soccer and volleyball teams to male students who identify as female.
Despite Minnerys protests, Wangyot, a Thai native who was born male and identifies as female, qualified and competed in the Class 3A girls sprints at the state meet, capturing third place in the 200-meter dash (27.3) and fifth in the 100 (13.36). She also played for the girls volleyball and basketball teams at Haines during her senior year.
However, Fairbanks (Alaska) Hutchinson junior Saskia Harrison, whose time of 14.11 seconds in the 100 left her outside the 16-competitor cut for the Class 1A-2A-3A field, took issue with Wangyots presence in the event.
Im glad that this person is comfortable with who they are and theyre able to be happy with who they are, she told KTVA-TV, but competitively I dont think its completely 100 percent fair.
Ex Lurker
(3,812 posts)lpbk2713
(42,753 posts)She's probaly booked a slot on Faux by now.
Initech
(100,063 posts)Their existence is predicated on hatred for anyone that isn't straight and white. Their policies do more harm than good. And this is a perfect example.
Lucky Luciano
(11,253 posts)"Im glad that this person is comfortable with who they are and theyre able to be happy with who they are, she told KTVA-TV, but competitively I dont think its completely 100 percent fair.
I agree with this. It is like a roided up female athlete, unless I am missing something. Do they test for male hormones for female trans athletes? Is there some level of male hormone that they must be below to compete with girls/women? It does seem unfair otherwise.
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)Your questions about hormone levels are good ones. It seems that regardless of which gender a person identifies as, there are physical advantages that usually come with having a Y chromosome.
The policy seems to unfairly benefit people that are born with Y chromosomes that identify as female, while putting the people that are born without a Y chromosome that identify as a male at a significant disadvantage.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)& different distribution. The biological male/female differences are rather huge. There is also a highly significant difference between VO2 Max norms.
Allowing MTFs to play as females instantly turns an average young male athlete into a stellar female athlete.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8477683
I don't think it's fair to other athletes (who are biologically female).
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)http://jezebel.com/5656062/making-sports-fair-for-transgender-athletes
LisaL
(44,973 posts)females, even if this transgender female isn't taking hormones (but just identifies as a female).
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)you can't specify, as the Federal Government has, that people be allowed access to the bathroom of the gender they identify with, but then cut them off when they decide to play a sport. It doesn't work that way.
braddy
(3,585 posts)EL34x4
(2,003 posts)Or any surgical or medical procedure for that matter.
Alaska leaves it up to each district to make their own rules regarding transgender athletes. The Haines Borough School District policy is as follows: "For the purposes of gender identification for interscholastic activities, the district will consider the gender identity based on the student's consistent declaration of gender identity, their actions, attitude, dress and mannerisms."
braddy
(3,585 posts)Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Height tends to be an advantage is most sports, somebody who was born as a male is likely to be taller than somebody born as a woman, and years of hormones wont change that.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)and biological females compete against biological females (in most sports). If females could be competitive against males, there would be no need to gender segregate sports to begin with.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)It's up to the school to decide. What about schools that this school is competing against?
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)The complainers obviously don't get it. Nattaphon is a girl, and therefore should be able to compete with other girls. Ms. Harrison sounds like a bit of a whiner to me.
Democat
(11,617 posts)Check up thread.
That doesn't mean these right wingers aren't bigots.
EL34x4
(2,003 posts)Harrison should be proud to see Nattaphon break barriers (and possibly break long-standing high school girls' athletic records).
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Really?
Abq_Sarah
(2,883 posts)There's nothing bigoted about that and she shouldn't be bullied into pretending this was fair or right.
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)This individual has an unfair advantage over their competitors. It is no different than those competing who are supplementing with hormones, steroids, etc. If it's athletics, they should be competing due to XX or XY.
Initech
(100,063 posts)joshcryer
(62,269 posts)From what I gather the students aren't making a fuss, Harrison in particular seemed to just be answering a question from the media.
MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)I see both sides. Female, but nonetheless kind of cheating.
Perhaps sports can be "XX" or "XY" genetic classes and leave it at that, without reference to sex.
Of course, you still have the occasional XXY or XYY.
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)The people would really be screwed over by the policy that the school in the OP is using are the people that are born 'XX', but identify as males. By the school's policy, if they wanted to run track, they'd have to try out for the men's team. A lot of them would be good enough to compete against females, but wouldn't be able to make the men's team. They'd be pretty much out of luck.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Transcends the gender issue. Good thought!
ileus
(15,396 posts)Abq_Sarah
(2,883 posts)Ex Lurker
(3,812 posts)and thinks this, rather than bathrooms and locker rooms, is where the big area of contention will be, for reasons illustrated in this thread. The usual left/right, religious/nonreligious polarities break down. Allowing transgender athletes to compete against biological females will disadvantage the biological females, at least some of the time. And right now, there's no blood test/hormone level hurdle. If someone says they identify as a female, the guidance coming from higher authority says you are to consider them female, regardless of any other factors. This potentially puts (at least some) feminists at odds with (at least some) LGBTQ activists. The courts will probably have to hash it out, and a lot of people will be dissatisfied with whatever the outcome is.
deaniac21
(6,747 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)everything in sight.
JanMichael
(24,885 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)denied that gold medal.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)The Olympics didn't allow women to do it.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Who says sports are fair? One guy is 7 feet tall, and another guy is 5'5". Is that fair? No, but neither is life.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)philosslayer
(3,076 posts)You can't draw arbitrary lines and decide that someone is a female sometimes, but not other times. If you self identify as a female, you're a female. Period. Otherwise, the slippery slope and all that.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Thats not what this issue is about. Its about the inner person, and who they are, not about their physical attributes. Sorry you can't understand this.
This young woman IS a young woman, and wants to compete with other young women. Why would you possibly deny her that????
LisaL
(44,973 posts)It is about physical attributes.
jeez.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)When applying for a job, or determining what bathroom to use, or what locker room to use, or a thousand other areas, physical attributes aren't import. Biology is immaterial. Its what gender you identify as that matters.
BUT, when it comes to sports, well thats different. Any other areas that you determine transgender women "need not apply"?
LisaL
(44,973 posts)they jump. Not on how nice their "inner person" is.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)I do expect court cases RE Title IX for sports.
The reason we have different teams/competitions for sports is biological rather than social.
To put it bluntly, only a tiny fraction of biological women could compete on teams/organized sports if there were not this separation. Title IX has been interpeted to demand equal sports opportunities for each gender at education institutions receiving federal monies.
http://www.womenssportsfoundation.org/en/home/advocate/title-ix-and-issues/what-is-title-ix/standard-language-of-title-ix
Especially when it comes to the more competitive teams at top secondary institutions, a meaningful number of those slots may be taken by transgender (male to females).
In addition, the legal developments are moving toward using identification, and only identification, as a standard. There is a real legal issue here. I don't think there is one solution which will be fully "fair".
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Are you serious? So transgender women really aren't women? They're just women in their head? Wow.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)There are intersexuals, who are born with conditions that make them gender ambiguous or even express gender opposite to their chromosomes.
We use the word transgender to denote individuals whose gender identification is strongly different than their biological gender.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)...at least in the progressive community, that "biological gender" is immaterial. Its what a person identifies as that is important and the real differentiator.
Ex Lurker
(3,812 posts)to no one's satisfaction. Treating transgender females as biological females for athletic purposes will mean diminished athletic opportunities for biological females.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Pick your poison.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)Such as in medical treatment. Reproduction.
We are social creatures. In most cases our social reality IS what is relevant.
In sports, it is not. There is a long legal and social history related to equalizing opportunities for sports for women, and here the biological reality is legally very relevant.
forthemiddle
(1,379 posts)Are competing for the very few college sport scholarships available. Is it fair if a biological male comes in and becomes the top winner of those scholarships?
This is far more complicated than who is sitting in the next bathroom stall.
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)This is a very important point...one that I hope people consider without attacks.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)It's great to see her break barriers and be treated how she identifies.
However, the physical differences do give her quite an advantage. And when you look at how much more than just a trophy can be at stake when some of these young athletes are competing for college scholarships it doesn't seem fair.
It's an issue I see the Armed Forces will probably have to tackle very soon as well. On the standard Army PT test the standards for males and females are very different, and figuring out how to work trans Soldiers into that will be tough with no easy answers. A male who just passed the test would have a much higher score on the female scale, and when and where do you draw that line? Especially if you going to recognize non-binary and other genders aside from male and female.
Marr
(20,317 posts)There's a transgender MMA fighter named Fallon Fox who beats the living crap out of women and brags about it-- knock outs in 30 seconds. It's not even a contest. Awful.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Fallon Fox gave his female opponent a concussion and broke her eye socket.
Ive fought a lot of women and have never felt the strength that I felt in a fight as I did that night. I cant answer whether its because she was born a man or not, because Im not a doctor, she stated. I can only say, Ive never felt so overpowered ever in my life, and I am an abnormally strong female in my own right.
Read more: http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/transgender-mma-fighter-destroys-female-opponent/#ixzz4ArMOkGNG
Follow us: @TheLibRepublic on Twitter
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Competitive athletics is based on a level playing field and earned advantages (like training better and harder). Not on being born with significant muscle density advantages, etc. If a transgender female athlete is sufficiently advanced in hormone treatments to have the large majority of such advantages eliminated, fine. She should be able to compete as a female. If not, it's absolutely unfair, period.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)A transgender female is a transgender female only if she goes through hormone treatment???? Oh I don't think so. Its enough to identify as a female without having to go through an expensive hormonal process.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Lets just make it free for all. If I wanted to pump myself full of steroids before competing, I guess that should be just fine by you.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Hormone treatments are analogous to performance enhancing drugs. Everyone should compete just as they are. Males compete with males, and females compete with females. Agreed?
LisaL
(44,973 posts)If men are allowed to compete against women, then I fail to see why these women can't be allowed to take steroids, or whatever performance enhancing drugs they want.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)And I'm not quite strong enough, I'm not allowed to cork my bat.
If i don't throw hard enough, i'm not allowed to scuff the ball or throw a spitball.
Some athletes have natural advantages. Some men have more testosterone than others. Life isn't fair.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)Even now there is a lot of controversy over women with naturally higher testosterone.
This transgenders issue will only exacerbate this as (biological) women - feeling already marginalized will push back, as scholarships, awards, endorsements, etc. - already scarce, will become even more so. And to simply say "some athletes have natural advantages...life isn't fair" sounds more than a bit sexist, and is not going to cut it...
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Gender checks? Should we have those before people go into bathrooms or locker rooms as well?
jonno99
(2,620 posts)a top female athlete? How much competition is there in high-school and then in college to make the top ranks? 100% effort - and then some. Then take your biological male, how much effort would they have to make to equal the performance of the "biological" females? Less effort - wouldn't you agree?
So what do you think is fair? When it comes to handing out scholarships, awards, endorsement contracts to the "top" athletes, should there be any requirements?
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Its the gender you identify with that determines the gender you are. And I support that decision.
Abq_Sarah
(2,883 posts)That there should be no gender segregated sports? Let's just eliminate women's sports entirely. They don't have the genetic advantages to compete on an even field with men so why bother?
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Men play with men, and women play with women. Or women play with men.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)I'm sure you are going to say "because men have an unfair advantage", so doesn't it stand to reason that somebody who is transgender has the same unfair advantage.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Who wants to play basketball has an unfair advantage over someone 5'8". Life isn't fair, and neither are sports.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)jonno99
(2,620 posts)are told "sorry - you can't participate as a female because you are biologically a male", they should be accepting of that because, well, "Life isn't fair, and neither are sports".
...or did I misunderstood you?
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)I think it would become practically impossible for a female with 'xx' chromosomes to obtain an athletic scholarship for most collegiate sports.
A man that wouldn't otherwise be able to earn an athletic scholarship would simply have to lie, and claim he identifies as female to get the scholarship that an actual female would have gotten. Thousands of dollars is a strong incentive to lie.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)I'd say 'nice try,' but it really wasn't.
If the actual reasons for maintaining biological gender divisions in (most) athletic competitions hadn't already been presented in the thread, I'd probably explain in detail...but they are, and I thus find your misunderstanding of the point a bit, um...facile, shall we say.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Is that a young woman wants to run track with other young women, and yet she's being castigated for it. Its shameful.
Ford F-150
(72 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)jonno99
(2,620 posts)of the attitudes displayed on this thread. What I'm hearing is: "So, you're a female athlete born without testicles? Too bad, sucks to be you...".
As I said up-thread this issue is only going to get worse. Unless we reach some sort of compromise, women's sports will disappear.
elljay
(1,178 posts)and if you think there is no cheating, you are very naive. They already take all kinds of illegal substances, including hormones, to gain a competitive advantage. They do his knowing hat it may cause medical problems later on. I was with one athlete the evening before he died in his sleep caused, in large part, by his use of anabolic steroids. So, if you think that there will not be fake transgender males competing as females, you are deluded. I guarantee that here will be males trying to get sports scholarships and then, after college, "deciding" that they are really not trans. Four years of paid tuition at Stanford is a lot of money! And, female to male trans athletes will never be able to participate in competitive athletics if they have to compete against biological males. There should be different categories for trans athletes so we can be fair to them, as well as to biological women.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)There will be "fake" transgender females trying to get into womens bathrooms, showers, and locker rooms. So what? It will be an insignificant number, and will pale in comparison to the "real" transgender women who are just trying to get an opportunity or live their lives as they see fit.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)perhaps we are going to see the end of the concept of sex-segregated sports teams. After all, how can such teams be enforced without "genital police" which seem to be anathema to many people and especially offensive to transgender individuals? I do see the arguments on both sides, but perhaps this is a price to be paid for progress in the area of transgender rights.
moriah
(8,311 posts)... already does suggest some inherent sexism, and I would be interested to see how integrated gender events might work.
But it's a confusing landscape, even among people who aren't fundie. I'm Pagan and know a lot of Radical Faeries. The movement overall is extremely accepting of non-binary of gender, but at the same time some sanctuaries are for "male-bodied gay cis men" and others for "female-bodied women born with wombs". When one of the latter was hosting a daytime all-gender event but sanctuary rules went back in effect after (meaning the group with two trans women couldn't stay overnight) I had them and the two cis women with them as my guests that weekend.
I mean, it's their land, and part of the point of the event was to discuss how to handle "wombyn without wombs" inclusively and fairly. But it still was inconvenient for my guests, though I certainly enjoyed their company!
moriah
(8,311 posts)I definitely want every FTM to have the right to compete in male events, but some might be disqualified for the very hormone shots they take for masculinity.
I also do NOT want any kind of rule that makes it harder on female athletes with androgen insensitivity to be able to compete despite having an XY genotype in female events, as while they may have slightly more of an advantage if the androgen insensitivity is only partial, they have identified as female their whole lives and wouldn't be allowed to compete in male events because they lack male genitals and have from birth.
Bodies that did get to develop in the presence of active, useful testosterone do on the average grow taller, stronger, and stockier, though.
If it were more common and accepted for testosterone blocking and estrogen therapy to begin before puberty, I'd say that being the requirement for competition as a female would work. Most test isn't really excreted in massive quantities until then. But it's not common.
I really don't know what is fair to all athletes.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Although I am leery of treating any child with hormones just because they say they are transgendered. There would have to be some kind of evidence or assurance that this is, in fact, true and not a passing phase or whatever. I don't know that science or medicine is really very helpful right now on any of this.
Sports are a special case. Being male-to-female may give an advantage in some sports, but possibly not in others (maybe not so much in team sports, where it is a team effort, for instance). I don't think it is 100% certain that transgender women will win all the time in every sport, or even most of the time. And even then, I don't see a lot of male athletes transitioning for the sole purpose of competing against women. I think the number of transgender athletes will be very, very small.
But Title 9 is an issue. Women worked hard to even be allowed to compete and have only done so for a short time, really. Title 9 was a huge victory (but see the recent episode of the podcast Reveal for how some universities are gaming the system:
https://www.revealnews.org/episodes/womens-sports-a-mans-game/
In this one UCLA counts men on the practice basketball team (they practice against the women) as women for Title 9 accounting purposes. And there were other women counted, when they were not on any team and in fact had never even tried out.
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)My daughter runs track and if a XY were to run in the XX group it would be an unfair advantage. XY times outpace XX by at least 45 seconds to minutes.