General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOh wow, Donald. Another "Pocohantas" reference. You're so original and funny, Donald.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/741240449906663424Mike Nelson
(9,950 posts)...your racism, Donald!
maryellen99
(3,788 posts)meow2u3
(24,761 posts)DUzy nonetheless.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Nice one!
I would love it so much if EW used that on him!
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)RockaFowler
(7,429 posts)"No seriously - Delete Your Account"
emulatorloo
(44,098 posts)Hugin
(33,112 posts)Keep yukkin' it up, Il Douche.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Oh, right.
I forgot.
He has zero job-experience in politics and his policy-proposals get trashed by people who actually know economy, policy and foreign-policy.
My bad.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,831 posts)alarimer
(16,245 posts)Why haven't his advisers told him he is bad at it? Unless of course they approve of it.
I suspect that this is someone who never listens to other people anyway, so it would be pointless to try and control him. But he would do better if he weren't such a loose cannon.
Wounded Bear
(58,620 posts)He is, after all, his own best consultant on all matters.
nyquil_man
(1,443 posts)"The best people," in his estimation, are those who acknowledge his greatness and the wisdom of his decisions.
Thus, if Trump wants to be on Twitter, nobody in his organization is going to tell him he shouldn't be on Twitter.
djean111
(14,255 posts)if Warren had challenged her in the primaries.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,161 posts)No.
Hillary and her staff aren't eleven years old, so no.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Of course Hillary and her staff would not personally do it.
Bernie has been called nasty names. The same would have been done to Warren.
trumad
(41,692 posts)maxsolomon
(33,271 posts)The goal is to associate that term with her in the mind of the rubes - Crazy Bernie, Crooked Hillary. Every time you think Hillary, think Crooked. Doesn't matter if you believe it, your subconscious mind provides the emotion, and the criticism is invalidated.
Ad Hominem 101.
Scott Adam's blog is detailing Trump's sales/persuasion techniques, and he thinks Trump's going to win: http://blog.dilbert.com/