Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

muntrv

(14,505 posts) Tue Jun 28, 2016, 02:53 PM Jun 2016

8

Supreme Court will not hear case about pharmacists invoking "conscience clause."

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-rejects-pharmacists-religious-rights-appeal/ar-AAhJ2nA?ocid=ansmsnnews11

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court will not hear case about pharmacists invoking "conscience clause." (Original Post) muntrv Jun 2016 OP

Good. People should not be able to institutionalize their superstitious nonsense! immoderate Jun 2016 #1

If you don't want to dispense drugs malaise Jun 2016 #2

Very good. nt tblue37 Jun 2016 #3

Man, they are on FIRE! AwakeAtLast Jun 2016 #4

Individual pharmacists don't have to fill the prescriptions SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2016 #5

immoderate

(20,885 posts)

1. Good. People should not be able to institutionalize their superstitious nonsense!

Reply to muntrv (Original post)

Tue Jun 28, 2016, 02:58 PM

Jun 2016

And call it freedom.

--imm

malaise

(268,959 posts)

2. If you don't want to dispense drugs

Reply to muntrv (Original post)

Tue Jun 28, 2016, 02:59 PM

Jun 2016

don't work in a pharmacy. Your religious views have nothing to do with my fugging prescription.

Thank you Supremes

tblue37

(65,339 posts)

3. Very good. nt

Reply to muntrv (Original post)

Tue Jun 28, 2016, 03:04 PM

Jun 2016

AwakeAtLast

(14,124 posts)

4. Man, they are on FIRE!

Reply to muntrv (Original post)

Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:22 PM

Jun 2016

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)

5. Individual pharmacists don't have to fill the prescriptions

Reply to muntrv (Original post)

Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:31 PM

Jun 2016

but they must refer the patient to another pharmacist in the same pharmacy. Very reasonable law.

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court will not he...