General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'll predict it now: the Brexit will never ACTUALLY take place
I think Cameron strategically resigned, effective in October, to slow the process down to a halt. That's what I think will happen. A lot of paper has to be pushed before the separation can take place, and I don't think it will materialize.
Cameron, not wanting to be associated with this big bag of shit, has said that he will leave the the Article 50 invocation to his successor. That's several more months for the Pound to take a beating and the FTSE and other markets to slump.
The Leave side is disorganized and not even unified among themselves on means and ends.
Public opinion is already showing signs of buyers remorse. And as small investors see their retirement savings go up in smoke that too will weaken the Leave momentum.
Parliament, including big majorities of Labor and Conservative MP's are opposed to leaving and they must approve an Article 50 invocation.
Never mind holding a new referendum. The new PM (no guarantee it will be Boris Badenov) will likely just delay the invocation with pre-invocation investigative commissions, studies, meetings, summits, negotiations, etc. until such time as the Leave momentum peters out and he/she can just quietly abandon the whole thing (probably on a Friday afternoon news dump).
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)This is the dog that caught the car.
randome
(34,845 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Scotland and Ireland are making noises about what they might do if Brexit succeeds. There's even talk of them joining EU as if they were independent nations.
LeftishBrit
(41,203 posts)It's all a complete and utter mess.
Svafa
(594 posts)TubbersUK
(1,439 posts)or petty infighting among some of the most execrable specimens of the Eton/Oxbridge elite.
Michael Goves wife has described the EU referendum result as terrifying, in another indication that Leave campaigners may not have expected to win Thursdays vote on EU membership.
Writing in the Daily Mail, Sarah Vine said she wrongly thought that polling day would bring an end to months of uncertainty and anxiety.
Her account is the latest example of Mr Gove and Boris Johnson making their views known through newspaper columns, rather than press conferences or speeches.
Cameron, Eton and Oxford. Boris, Eton and Oxford. Gove, Oxford & Boris's shirt pocket.
The two men met as students at Oxford university, where Mr Gove supported Mr Johnsons campaign to become president of the Oxford Union 30 years ago.
I was Boriss stooge. I became a votary of the Boris cult, the justice secretary wrote in 2005. Mr Johnson was elected Union president, after he renounced his Conservative ties and posed as a supporter of the Social Democrats, the universitys largest political grouping.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3fe28108-3dd9-11e6-8716-a4a71e8140b0.html#axzz4CzoPdUVg
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)the morning after the vote:
Obviously eager to invoke Article 50 and go down in history as destroying the UK.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I think you're correct. Britain got really drunk one night last week and is only now beginning to piece together those foggy moments before finally coming to a collective "oh crap, what have I done? I better fix this before the folks get home" moment.
drray23
(7,619 posts)The european union told the uk to hurry up the process. The EU president jean claude junker was particularly insistent about it. Farage insulting the EU parlamentarians at the last session did not help either.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)never liked the idea of joining it. They want out.
pampango
(24,692 posts)of the EU.
The other EU countries may be able to make a better EU without the most faint-hearted member, if they can neutralize the far-right, anti-EU elements in those countries.
OTOH, if the far-right in France and other countries gets their way, the EU may well be history.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)For reasons pertaining to their histories. I suppose that dynamic applies everywhere, but voters in both countries have flirted with the far right before, to no avail (post-WWII).
What I can't figure out is this - do current events (populism, rejection of neoliberalism, nationalism) represent just another momentary fad (as before), or is this the beginning of a fundamental change in how citizens want government policy to serve their needs? And why is it happening now?
Certainly, it appears even the experts have been caught with their pants down (and not just there, but here too, with Trump and Sanders doing FAR better than anyone ever dreamed they would).
pampango
(24,692 posts)When you're in the middle of a trend it seems like it will go on forever. Historically, sometimes things like "populism, rejection of neoliberalism, nationalism" have gone on for decades. Other times they have come and gone more quickly.
The cycle of nationalism - internationalism - nationalism will continue. A change to prioritizing international cooperation over national sovereignty will come again. Who knows whether it will be this November or next yea or in 10 or 20 years. Things run in cycles. I hope the end of the Trump/Brexit will come to an end soon.