Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 08:08 PM Jun 2016

Laura Ingraham Suggests People Wear Diapers Rather Than Share Bathrooms With Transgender People

Not The Onion!

https://mediamatters.org/video/2016/06/29/laura-ingraham-suggests-people-wear-diapers-rather-share-bathrooms-transgender-people/211276

Oh we have a new transgender update for you as well. Oh no new transgender news for all of you who are bathroom-goers and public -- you use public restrooms? I think a lot of people are going to be walking around with just Depends on from now on. They're just not going to use the bathroom. Adult diapers, diapers for everybody. No one's going to be going to the bathroom. You have little kids, there's going to be no bathrooms. We're just going to all wear Depends. Everyone will just be happy. Then you'll be in your own bathroom. Everyone's bathroom is just their own clothes, OK? So this is what we're going to go to.


Laura and David (Vitter) up a tree, S-H-I-T-I-N-G!
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Laura Ingraham Suggests People Wear Diapers Rather Than Share Bathrooms With Transgender People (Original Post) KamaAina Jun 2016 OP
These people are scared to death of everything NightWatcher Jun 2016 #1
You first, Laura. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2016 #2
Who sits and dwells on such asinine musings? Aerows Jun 2016 #6
Former US Senator David Vitter: "Don't have to tell me twice, Laura" Yavin4 Jun 2016 #3
Sounds like she's been chatting with Teddy Nugent and David Vitter. roamer65 Jun 2016 #4
Posted in the LGBT forum. Aerows Jun 2016 #5
+1,000,000 AngryOldDem Jun 2016 #12
Only way I can put it. Aerows Jun 2016 #13
Exactly. And it is as simple as that. AngryOldDem Jun 2016 #14
Works for me. GoCubsGo Jun 2016 #7
Well the bigots are shitting themselves so probably a good idea that they wear diapers Monk06 Jun 2016 #8
the republican party is chock full of assholes, she's just one more. spanone Jun 2016 #9
She would be an excellent VP pick for Trump. eom guillaumeb Jun 2016 #10
So they are the party of big ideas? C_U_L8R Jun 2016 #11
Oh, gawd. 3catwoman3 Jun 2016 #15
What a brilliant idea. Scare everybody so the sales of Depends goes up. mnhtnbb Jun 2016 #16
OK great idea! But then again you have to provide changing facilities. Initech Jun 2016 #17
They'll just leave their used diapers in the parking lot and drive away. hunter Jun 2016 #25
Well, I suggest that Ingraham liberalhistorian Jun 2016 #18
Easier to tell who the RW babies are. baldguy Jun 2016 #19
I don't understand the controversy here. Were in the hell have they gone to the doc03 Jun 2016 #20
Let her stink herself up. Ilsa Jun 2016 #21
Seems to me they should be more worried about, Jerry Sandusky, Congressman Wide Stance, doc03 Jun 2016 #22
Worry about pedophiles, yes, closeted gays, no. merrily Jun 2016 #29
Fine by me. More stalls for the rest of us. n/t Iris Jun 2016 #23
Funny how this bathroom sharing has been going on for as long as there have been transgenders, and Todays_Illusion Jun 2016 #24
Kinky rpannier Jun 2016 #26
This guy will be a billionaire under her plan: Initech Jun 2016 #28
Great idea! Then none of us will have to share johns with bigots. merrily Jun 2016 #27
They are welcome to them Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2016 #30
Is this theoretical? Or is she speaking from experience? JHB Jun 2016 #31

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,582 posts)
2. You first, Laura.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 08:12 PM
Jun 2016

Anybody who'd rather crap their own pants (or Depends) than share a bathroom with a transgender person (and how are you going to know who is and who isn't?) deserves to waddle around in their own stench.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
6. Who sits and dwells on such asinine musings?
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 08:36 PM
Jun 2016

I'm not there to move in and start a home, I'm just there to pee. It's silly how worked up people get over things like this.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
5. Posted in the LGBT forum.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 08:34 PM
Jun 2016

I originally posted this in the LGBT forum, but I think it fits in general, as well.
************************************


Can everybody please get the F*CK out of the bathroom?

I remember someone once asked Dear Abby if it was wrong to use the handicapped stall if there was a line. She replied that if you have to go that bad, you have a handicap.

That is relevant because we go into the damn bathroom for business. It's not business we delight in - it is called "waste". We don't go in there to make friends, we go in there to drop friends off.

I doubt that there is a single female concert/sports event goer that has not peed in the men's room - they cleared it out for us.

Do you think I want to go in a public bathroom? No. The toilet paper sucks. Do you think I want to linger in a public bathroom? Don't even attempt to make eye contact with me.

I could give two shits (ha!) if Vladamir Putin is on one side, and Kim Jong whatever Ur is on the other. If I have to go, we are all in the same quandry.

Get over the fact that someone you disagree with might hear you tinkle.

Tinkle, wash your hands and get the hell out of there. Nobody in there is any more thrilled to be in a public bathroom than you are!
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
13. Only way I can put it.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 09:16 PM
Jun 2016

If you are restroom obsessed, you have a shed load more problems than what genitals people have.

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
14. Exactly. And it is as simple as that.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 09:27 PM
Jun 2016

I couldn't care less who's in there with me. I do my business, then leave. If people have issues with who else is using a public facility, then they should just hold it until they're home. Diapers can get expensive.

GoCubsGo

(32,074 posts)
7. Works for me.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 08:37 PM
Jun 2016

I'll be more than happy if Ingraham and her nutbag ilk stay out of public restrooms. I'm sure they'll stay much cleaner with the reduced usage. And, there will be fewer lines in which the rest of us will have to wait.

I hope she gets a nice diaper rash.

Monk06

(7,675 posts)
8. Well the bigots are shitting themselves so probably a good idea that they wear diapers
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 08:40 PM
Jun 2016

until they're 'toilet trained'

3catwoman3

(23,943 posts)
15. Oh, gawd.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 09:43 PM
Jun 2016

These folks all have their heads up their asses. Maybe that will keep them from needing to use public bathrooms.

mnhtnbb

(31,373 posts)
16. What a brilliant idea. Scare everybody so the sales of Depends goes up.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 10:16 PM
Jun 2016

Such great Republican logic. Follow the $$.

Initech

(100,033 posts)
17. OK great idea! But then again you have to provide changing facilities.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 10:22 PM
Jun 2016

And proper sanitization and proper disposal of used diapers. Can you do that?

hunter

(38,301 posts)
25. They'll just leave their used diapers in the parking lot and drive away.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 12:10 AM
Jun 2016

Republicans never worry about the messes they leave behind.

liberalhistorian

(20,814 posts)
18. Well, I suggest that Ingraham
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 10:23 PM
Jun 2016

buy and install a few more brain cells. That, of course, is just as idiotic and as likely to happen as her stupid suggestion.

People have been sharing bathrooms with LGBT people for forever, they've just never known because there's really no way of knowing. What does she and her ilk want us all to do, demand a personal genital check of everyone who's in a public bathroom when we walk in? Are people supposed to start carrying around their birth certificates and identification papers now to use the fucking bathroom?

Of course, this is not about bathrooms any more than segregated water fountains and pools were actually about water fountains and pools.

doc03

(35,293 posts)
20. I don't understand the controversy here. Were in the hell have they gone to the
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 10:28 PM
Jun 2016

bathroom for the last 100 years? Have they been holding it in all these years?

Ilsa

(61,690 posts)
21. Let her stink herself up.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 10:30 PM
Jun 2016

Republicans act so tough (more wars, more bullying, more torture) but they're really just cowards.

doc03

(35,293 posts)
22. Seems to me they should be more worried about, Jerry Sandusky, Congressman Wide Stance,
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 10:35 PM
Jun 2016

or the perverts from the Clergy than some transgender person.

Todays_Illusion

(1,209 posts)
24. Funny how this bathroom sharing has been going on for as long as there have been transgenders, and
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 10:39 PM
Jun 2016

only now is a frightening idea.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
27. Great idea! Then none of us will have to share johns with bigots.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 12:33 AM
Jun 2016

By their diaper rash, ye shall know them.

JHB

(37,153 posts)
31. Is this theoretical? Or is she speaking from experience?
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 07:30 AM
Jun 2016

After all, some people are just so full of it they'd never get off the pot without some pamper-ing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Laura Ingraham Suggests P...