Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 10:14 AM Jul 2016

Reagan killed the Fairness Doctrine, and Congress needs to bring it back

Late in the second term of Reagan, there was a bill that was passed in both the house and Senate with huge bipartisan support. The bill was called the Fairness Doctrine. The bill would have made permanent some legislation that had been passed in the late 40's. This Fairness Doctrine made TV and radio to give equal time to all sides of a political issue. It also regulated the ownership of newspapers and TV/radio stations so that no single entity could control the news in a certain area - it allowed more than one viewpoint to be presented. Reagan vetoed the bill, and with pressure on the GOP in the house and Senate, an override was not going to happen.

Roger Ailles worked for Nixon and then Reagan. it was widely know than he was a hatchet man and went after their enemies. He also worked for Rudy G when he ran for mayor of NYC. Rupert Murdoch knew very well of the guy and when he wanted to enter the US market with his disinformation channel, he knew exactly who to hire to run it. The rest is history.

We need the next Congress to send the Fairness Doctrine back to President Clinton by the spring of next year. The hate radio has to go away and the lies of FoxNews and others with it. Newspapers need to go back to printing news instead of commentary ad opinion and no single entity can own all the news outlets for an area.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reagan killed the Fairness Doctrine, and Congress needs to bring it back (Original Post) tonyt53 Jul 2016 OP
Ugh, not this again anoNY42 Jul 2016 #1
Your opinion, and you are standing with very few. tonyt53 Jul 2016 #3
Strange anoNY42 Jul 2016 #5
I'm with you ano Yupster Jul 2016 #6
Imagine the confusion this would cause with Fox viewers. gordianot Jul 2016 #2
When there is only one side sorefeet Jul 2016 #4
The Fairness Doctrine wouldn't have applied to Fox News. Captain Stern Jul 2016 #7
The fact that Trump gets 15 times the media coverage probably helped him win. Kablooie Jul 2016 #8
jeez - - the Fairness Doctrine again.... melm00se Jul 2016 #9
 

anoNY42

(670 posts)
1. Ugh, not this again
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 10:21 AM
Jul 2016

"This Fairness Doctrine made TV and radio to give equal time to all sides of a political issue."

I can just imagine when CNN is forced to have a Neo-Nazi on air talking about Trump's wall. Hey, Neo-Nazis are one "side" of that political issue...

The "Fairness" doctrine is a stupid, blunt-instrument way to "fix" the political discussions of this nation.

Yupster

(14,308 posts)
6. I'm with you ano
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 10:34 AM
Jul 2016

I remember Saturday Night Live making fun of the Fairness Doctrine back in the Seventies.

Some things are better left buried.

Captain Stern

(2,201 posts)
7. The Fairness Doctrine wouldn't have applied to Fox News.
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 11:25 AM
Jul 2016

It only applied to broadcast radio and television.

Kablooie

(18,628 posts)
8. The fact that Trump gets 15 times the media coverage probably helped him win.
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 11:33 AM
Jul 2016

And it will be the same with Hillary.
We will hear Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Hillary Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump.

melm00se

(4,991 posts)
9. jeez - - the Fairness Doctrine again....
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 12:44 PM
Jul 2016

a few points:

1) Applied only to over the air radio and tv broadcasts. it would not impact satellite/internet content providers.
2) The electronic media landscape is radically different today than 60 or so years ago. The diversity of content providers has never been greater.
3) At the peak of the Fairness Doctrine, news (especially on radio) was just pablum. Content was limited to things that wouldn't trigger FD requirements.
4) The government shouldn't be in the content business and with today's political environment it would be forced into that role.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reagan killed the Fairnes...