Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Democratic Party’s Racial Reckoning
In 1992, Bill Clinton had to pander to white bigots to win the presidency. In 2016, Hillary can call them what they are.
[link:http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/10/hillary_clinton_s_reverse_sister_souljah_moment.html|Clinton's reverse Sister Souljah moment- Slate
It happened after moderator Lester Holt pressed Trump on his birtherism. Mr. Trump, he said, for five years you perpetuated a false claim of the nations first black president was not a natural-born citizen. You questioned his legitimacy. In the last couple weeks, you acknowledged what most Americans have accepted for years: the president was born in the United States. Can you tell us what took you so long?
Trump tried to shift blame, pinning birtherism on the Clinton camp and its conduct during the 2008 Democratic primary. This is false. But more interesting than Trumps answer was Clintons response. She didnt just dismiss his claim. She pushed back in the strongest way possible. Trump has really started his political activity based on this racist lie that our first black president was not an American citizen, Clinton said. There was absolutely no evidence for it, but he persisted. She continued, tying the birtherism to a larger critique: [R]emember, Donald started his career back in 1973 being sued by the Justice Department for racial discrimination, because he would not rent apartments in one of his developments to African Americans, and he made sure that the people who worked for him understood that was the policy. He actually was sued twice by the Justice Department. So he has a long record of engaging in racist behavior. Clintons message was simple: From the beginning of his business career to the launch of his political one, Trump swam in a rank pool of prejudice and racist insinuation. And then, with Trump established as both a beneficiary and catalyst of American bigotry, she dropped the story of Machado, a former Miss Universe, on his head. [O]ne of the worst things he said was about a woman in a beauty contest, Clinton said. He loves beauty contests, supporting them and hanging around them. And he called this woman Miss Piggy. Then he called her Miss Housekeeping, because she was Latina.
...
Its no small thing to call birtherism a racist lie in front of the largest-ever debate audience. Presidential candidates slam opponents for almost everything under the sun. But not racism. Not because it isnt present, but because it risks alienating white voters who arent comfortable with accusations of racial prejudice or racist intent. But last week, facing an estimated 85 million viewers, Clinton did just that, in a way that wasnt imaginable four years ago (when Barack Obama ran against Mitt Romney and his veiled racial appeals), eight years ago (when Sarah Palin fueled her nascent celebrity with raw white resentment), and certainly 30 years ago, when George H.W. Bush and the Republican Party stoked white fears of black crime for political gain, crushing Democratic nominee Michael Dukakis in the process.
...
Bill Clinton distanced himself from anything that smacked of identity politics or traditional liberalism. Hillary Clinton has not. This speaks to a larger reality in American politics. Racismeither virulent or implicitis the enemy of progressive political coalitions. Its either an obstacle to building those coalitions in the first place, or its a part of the process that unravels them. White departure from the Democratic Party cost it the Oval Office for nearly 20 years, and the effort to win those whites back yielded a disappointing and myopic centrism. But now those whites arent as central to Democratic presidential fortunes, and it has given many in the party the space they need to move in a more liberal direction. And looking at the tenor of Democratic policy debates over the past yeardebates over how the welfare state should expand, not if it shouldthey have. Which is to say that the great upside of this shift is for the blacks, Latinos, and young people who form a critical part of the Democratic Partys national electorate. Their demands for criminal justice reform, immigration reform, and broader economic reformas channeled through the primary campaign of Bernie Sandersarent a deal-breaker for national Democratic politicians.
Trump tried to shift blame, pinning birtherism on the Clinton camp and its conduct during the 2008 Democratic primary. This is false. But more interesting than Trumps answer was Clintons response. She didnt just dismiss his claim. She pushed back in the strongest way possible. Trump has really started his political activity based on this racist lie that our first black president was not an American citizen, Clinton said. There was absolutely no evidence for it, but he persisted. She continued, tying the birtherism to a larger critique: [R]emember, Donald started his career back in 1973 being sued by the Justice Department for racial discrimination, because he would not rent apartments in one of his developments to African Americans, and he made sure that the people who worked for him understood that was the policy. He actually was sued twice by the Justice Department. So he has a long record of engaging in racist behavior. Clintons message was simple: From the beginning of his business career to the launch of his political one, Trump swam in a rank pool of prejudice and racist insinuation. And then, with Trump established as both a beneficiary and catalyst of American bigotry, she dropped the story of Machado, a former Miss Universe, on his head. [O]ne of the worst things he said was about a woman in a beauty contest, Clinton said. He loves beauty contests, supporting them and hanging around them. And he called this woman Miss Piggy. Then he called her Miss Housekeeping, because she was Latina.
...
Its no small thing to call birtherism a racist lie in front of the largest-ever debate audience. Presidential candidates slam opponents for almost everything under the sun. But not racism. Not because it isnt present, but because it risks alienating white voters who arent comfortable with accusations of racial prejudice or racist intent. But last week, facing an estimated 85 million viewers, Clinton did just that, in a way that wasnt imaginable four years ago (when Barack Obama ran against Mitt Romney and his veiled racial appeals), eight years ago (when Sarah Palin fueled her nascent celebrity with raw white resentment), and certainly 30 years ago, when George H.W. Bush and the Republican Party stoked white fears of black crime for political gain, crushing Democratic nominee Michael Dukakis in the process.
...
Bill Clinton distanced himself from anything that smacked of identity politics or traditional liberalism. Hillary Clinton has not. This speaks to a larger reality in American politics. Racismeither virulent or implicitis the enemy of progressive political coalitions. Its either an obstacle to building those coalitions in the first place, or its a part of the process that unravels them. White departure from the Democratic Party cost it the Oval Office for nearly 20 years, and the effort to win those whites back yielded a disappointing and myopic centrism. But now those whites arent as central to Democratic presidential fortunes, and it has given many in the party the space they need to move in a more liberal direction. And looking at the tenor of Democratic policy debates over the past yeardebates over how the welfare state should expand, not if it shouldthey have. Which is to say that the great upside of this shift is for the blacks, Latinos, and young people who form a critical part of the Democratic Partys national electorate. Their demands for criminal justice reform, immigration reform, and broader economic reformas channeled through the primary campaign of Bernie Sandersarent a deal-breaker for national Democratic politicians.
This piece is brilliant. You should read it in its entirety over at Slate. It accurately shows how the Clintons have always positioned themselves on the left of the overton window, especially concerning racism, doing what they needed to do to win, while pulling a racist and resentful electorate towards more decent (and what I'd call real Christian) policies.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 376 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post