Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYT: Case Accusing Bush Officials of 9/11 Abuses Heads to Supreme Court
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/12/us/politics/supreme-court-9-11-muslim-bush-administration.html?smid=tw-share&_r=1Case Accusing Bush Officials of 9/11 Abuses Heads to Supreme Court
By ADAM LIPTAK
OCT. 11, 2016
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to decide whether high-ranking George W. Bush administration officials including John Ashcroft, the former attorney general, and Robert S. Mueller III, the former F.B.I. director may be held liable for policies adopted after the Sept. 11 attacks.
The case began as a class action in 2002 filed by immigrants, most of them Muslim, over policies and practices that swept hundreds of people into the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn on immigration violations in the weeks after the attacks. The plaintiffs said they had been subjected to beatings, humiliating searches and other abuses.
snip//
Rachel Meeropol, a lawyer with the Center for Constitutional Rights, which represents the plaintiffs, said the cases, Ashcroft v. Turkmen, No. 15-1359 and two others, involved fundamental principles.
No one is above the law, she said. To suggest that the most powerful people in our nation should escape liability when they violate clearly established law defies the most fundamental principle of our legal system.
At a time when racial and religious profiling are put forward as serious policy proposals for dealing with everything from immigration to terrorism, it is more important than ever that the high court affirm that government officials, especially those at the highest levels, can be held accountable when they break the law, she said.
Unless the Senate confirms a new justice in time for arguments, the cases will be heard by just six justices, as Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan have recused themselves. They did not say why, but Justice Sotomayor used to be a judge on the Second Circuit and Justice Kagan was formerly United States solicitor general. They had presumably been involved in the cases in those capacities.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 540 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT: Case Accusing Bush Officials of 9/11 Abuses Heads to Supreme Court (Original Post)
babylonsister
Oct 2016
OP
Oh great so the court will be 4-2 Repugs? I can see this dropped in a minute.
yeoman6987
Oct 2016
#2
ColemanMaskell
(783 posts)1. hunh. Thanks for posting.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)2. Oh great so the court will be 4-2 Repugs? I can see this dropped in a minute.
Unless Kennedy goes with justices bryer and Ginsburg. Then it's a tie and the lower court stands.