General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChris Wallace as moderator
On MSNBC, didn't catch the name of the commentator, but he said that Hillary needs to be careful at the debate because Chris Wallace is a "skilled and accomplished arsonist." Whoa.
Missed the rest of that segment. Did anyone else hear that?
.
Johonny
(20,684 posts)And any attempt to burn Hillary hurts Trump because there is no antihillary topic Trump wont carry to looney land.
piechartking
(617 posts)He's probably the best of the lot from over there, although Shepard Smith has his moments too. But I wouldn't expect any fact-checking of Trump, and I would expect some passive-aggressive hostility toward Clinton.
Statistical
(19,264 posts)The "debate" will be one side making up any random shit he wants to with full acceptance by the "moderator".
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)then turn to the cameras and say...How did groping make you feel donald....and then walk off the stage....thats worth an extra 5 million votes for sure
meow2u3
(24,745 posts)That would lower her to his level in the eyes of the public. This is supposed to be a debate, not a pig wrestling match.
wishstar
(5,267 posts)I'll bet she and her campaign have learned a lot from her previous interview with him and will use that to her advantage
MADem
(135,425 posts)aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)About emails and Benghazi.
How or why did HRC agree to have a moderator from a right wing propaganda cable channel?
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)He has contempt for Bill and Hillary. But, everybody but regular FoxNews viewers will see what he will be trying to do.
narnian60
(3,510 posts)that wanted Joy Reid to co-moderate with Wallace. It ended up with 20,488 votes the last update I saw, and was going to be sent to MSNBC, Fox Broadcasting Company, and the Commission on Presidential Debates. I wonder if it did any good.