Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

still_one

(92,061 posts)
1. Anyone who utilizes that phraseology continuously in a dialog knows exactly
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 11:32 AM
Oct 2016

what they are doing, since it is readily pointed out to them that we are the DEMOCRATIC party, and if they refuse to accept that, then they are completely disingenuous

ananda

(28,836 posts)
2. Well if they say Democrat for Democratic, then...
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 11:35 AM
Oct 2016

... by logic, they have to say "Republic" for Republican.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
5. And those who argue it's "no big deal" also know exactly what they are doing. And...
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 11:55 AM
Oct 2016

... it's not just being contrary for its own sake. There's something else going on. I'll just leave it at that.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
9. No, it started well before McCarthy
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 04:24 PM
Oct 2016

There are instances from the nineteenth century, according to the Wikipedia account of the history of the usage. At that time it seems to have been more of a casual mistake. It later became deliberate:

William Safire studied the partisan use of "Democrat Party" as epithet since the 1940 presidential campaign of Republican Wendell Willkie. Minnesota Governor Harold Stassen, Willkie's campaign manager, explained to Safire his motivation for using the term: Stassen said that because the Democratic Party was at that time partly controlled by undemocratic city bosses—"by Hague in New Jersey, Pendergast in Missouri and Kelly-Nash in Chicago, [it] should not be called a 'Democratic Party.' It should be called the 'Democrat Party.'"[16]
. . . .
In 1996, the wording throughout the Republican party platform was changed from "Democratic Party" to "Democrat Party": Republican leaders "explained they wanted to make the subtle point that the Democratic Party had become elitist".[19]


To be fair to the Rethuglicans -- uh, pardon me, the Republicans -- it should be noted that some within their ranks have dissented. For example, in 1984 Jack Kemp said that using the phrase in the GOP platform would be "an insult to our Democratic friends" and the proposal was dropped.

There actually is a Democrat Party -- in Thailand. So when Republicans think they can't discuss issues without invoking some foreign country, you have to ask: Why do they hate America?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Democrat" as adjective s...