Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
Wed Nov 2, 2016, 12:17 AM Nov 2016

President Obama: the federal government is looking for ways to reroute the Dakota Access pipeline

President Obama said Tuesday that the federal government is looking for ways to reroute the Dakota Access pipeline project, which has been paralyzed by weeks of demonstrations by environmentalists.

In an interview with MSNBC on Tuesday, Mr. Obama seemed to side with occupiers who want the pipeline rerouted or scrapped outright, citing opposition by Indian groups.

“We’re monitoring this closely, and you know I think that as a general rule my view is that there is a way for us to accommodate sacred lands of Native Americans,” Mr. Obama told MSNBC.

But Mr. Obama indicated that the federal government has no intention of stepping in, despite the threat to federal lands.

“We’re going to let it play out for several more weeks and then determine whether or not this can be resolved in a way that I think is properly attentive to traditions of the first Americans,” he said.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/1/obama-exploring-ways-reroute-dakota-access-pipelin/
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Obama: the federal government is looking for ways to reroute the Dakota Access pipeline (Original Post) dixiegrrrrl Nov 2016 OP
Did they approve it initially and why? MichMan Nov 2016 #1
It was originally supposed to run through several populated areas in Dakota, but... Bucky Nov 2016 #3
Was it approved? MichMan Nov 2016 #4
As long as "let it play out for several more weeks" doesn't lead to more violence... Lucinda Nov 2016 #2

MichMan

(11,900 posts)
1. Did they approve it initially and why?
Wed Nov 2, 2016, 12:36 AM
Nov 2016

While a lot of us support the environmental protesters, did the pipeline require government approval prior to starting construction?




Bucky

(53,986 posts)
3. It was originally supposed to run through several populated areas in Dakota, but...
Wed Nov 2, 2016, 01:03 AM
Nov 2016

local cities spoke out and demanded it be re-routed. This story is ultimately about how Indian nations have less political pull than mostly white cities

MichMan

(11,900 posts)
4. Was it approved?
Wed Nov 2, 2016, 08:53 AM
Nov 2016

If the pipeline company did not have the necessary approvals and built it anyway, then they should be forced to stop.

This won't be popular here, but if they did follow what was approved, it doesn't seem right that they should have it shut down now without being compensated.

I am comparing it to getting all the building permits for a new house, starting construction, and being told when it was half built that the township changed their mind and it was my problem. Is that wrong?

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
2. As long as "let it play out for several more weeks" doesn't lead to more violence...
Wed Nov 2, 2016, 01:02 AM
Nov 2016

As a rule I trust his moves, but this one is a little close to home for me...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama: the fede...