Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDirector @ Heritage Foundation "not sure" what their SCOTUS-blocking fundraiser page means.
Conservative Group Raises Cash To Help GOP Senators Block Supreme Court Nominees
The Heritage Foundation has a policy arsenal ready to go in the event Hillary Clinton wins the presidency.
11/01/2016 08:51 pm ET | Updated 6 hours ago
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/heritage-foundation-raises-cash-to-help-gop-senators-block-supreme-court-nominees_us_58190747e4b0f96eba968e4c
Give Senators the procedural tools to block any liberal nominee, reads one of the bullet points, which together read as a battle plan for lawmakers to follow in the event Trump loses the presidency.
Asked about this specific proposal, John Malcolm, the director of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at Heritage, demurred on its significance.
Im not sure what that means, he said, adding that his organization hasnt taken an official position on whether Republicans should stonewall future nominations to the Supreme Court.
*****
In fact, according to a new Heritage analysis of the Constitution and Senate procedure, it doesnt require any more than a small number of principled conservatives to hold the line, reads the missive. We can use procedural strategies to block a nominee and even prevent the use of the nuclear option to force through a nominee by majority vote.
The Heritage Foundation has a policy arsenal ready to go in the event Hillary Clinton wins the presidency.
11/01/2016 08:51 pm ET | Updated 6 hours ago
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/heritage-foundation-raises-cash-to-help-gop-senators-block-supreme-court-nominees_us_58190747e4b0f96eba968e4c
Give Senators the procedural tools to block any liberal nominee, reads one of the bullet points, which together read as a battle plan for lawmakers to follow in the event Trump loses the presidency.
Asked about this specific proposal, John Malcolm, the director of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at Heritage, demurred on its significance.
Im not sure what that means, he said, adding that his organization hasnt taken an official position on whether Republicans should stonewall future nominations to the Supreme Court.
*****
In fact, according to a new Heritage analysis of the Constitution and Senate procedure, it doesnt require any more than a small number of principled conservatives to hold the line, reads the missive. We can use procedural strategies to block a nominee and even prevent the use of the nuclear option to force through a nominee by majority vote.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 799 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Director @ Heritage Foundation "not sure" what their SCOTUS-blocking fundraiser page means. (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Nov 2016
OP
Must not have a lot of faith in the idea of Trump securing 270 electoral votes in a week
ck4829
Nov 2016
#3
I thought they wanted the people to have a voice by waiting until after the election
world wide wally
Nov 2016
#7
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)1. That group leads the way in how to hurt the middle class of this great country.
They have been at this for quite some time.
ck4829
(35,038 posts)3. Must not have a lot of faith in the idea of Trump securing 270 electoral votes in a week
No mention of any page telling people to get out there and support Trump's pick. Quite possibly because there is no page.
Now, why is that?
sinkingfeeling
(51,436 posts)4. How do we, the people, stop paying for US senators who refuse to
do their jobs?
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)5. Not electing them in the first place is the only option I know of
When they telegraph their punches like this, and people still vote for them, that means one of three things...voters aren't paying attention, they support it, or they don't care.
world wide wally
(21,738 posts)7. I thought they wanted the people to have a voice by waiting until after the election
How much bullshit is the legal limit anyway?