General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNate Silver's failed predictions ... all in one place
Nate isn't the worst by any means. But he seems to be a victim of being wedded to his assumptions that never seem to evolve. He killed it in 2008, but hasn't been the golden boy since.
I read him, from time to time, but I am no longer impressed.
=======================================
"Nate Silver emerged as Our National Oracle after successfully predicting many of the results in the 2008 election. But as Silvers satirical counterpart, Carl Diggler, has proven time and again, you may as well just be going with gut instinct based on Silvers terrible track record since 2008.
Nobody knows if Donald Trump will win. But one thing that has become clear is that prediction models about elections are virtually worthless. Silvers current hedging about who will win on Tuesday sounds like word salad."
========================================
http://paleofuture.gizmodo.com/nate-silvers-very-very-wrong-predictions-about-donald-t-1788583912
StrictlyRockers
(3,855 posts)Except for all of those times when he was flat out wrong. (many)
MFM008
(19,805 posts)George the amazing octopus.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)I think he is overcompensating for his fuck up.
broadcaster75201
(387 posts)nt