Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 06:28 PM Nov 2016

Federalist Paper 68

Federalist Paper 68 argues that the function of the electoral college is so that “the office of President will never fall to the lot of any [person] who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.” The framers of the constitution were hoping to avoid a situation in which the voters at large were swayed by a candidate who had “talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity.”

Who wrote Federalist Paper 68? Alexander Hamilton

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federalist Paper 68 (Original Post) ehrnst Nov 2016 OP
Publius oldtime dfl_er Nov 2016 #1
Yeah, but that was in "America" world wide wally Nov 2016 #2
Then according to Federalist Paper 68, the electors should not vote for Trump. jalan48 Nov 2016 #3
3 U.S. Code 15 SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #4
Yet the opposition will be recorded. bigmonkey Nov 2016 #6
Is it transparently partisan SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #7
Thank you. I love this history stuff. Please keep up the original documents. ancianita Nov 2016 #5

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
4. 3 U.S. Code 15
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 08:42 PM
Nov 2016

With the consent of both the House and the Senate, electoral votes can be rejected and not counted as cast.

bigmonkey

(1,798 posts)
6. Yet the opposition will be recorded.
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 08:54 PM
Nov 2016

That "victory" would be transparently partisan. I'm in favor of that outcome, compared to rolling over.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
7. Is it transparently partisan
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 09:10 PM
Nov 2016

if the House and Senate reject a vote that goes against the will of the people of that state?

For example, Colorado. One of their electors, I believe his last name is Baca, is threatening to not cast his electoral vote for Hillary Clinton, in an attempt to reach a compromise with electors in other states for a third candidate. Get enough votes, throw the election to the House and let the House elect the third candidate rather than either Trump or Clinton.

If Mr. Baca follows through and votes for a third party (as in individual, not necessarily party), I would assume that Colorado's Democratic House member and their Democratic Senator would file a written objection, and make the case for rejecting that electoral vote. Would you consider those objections to be transparently partisan, or would you consider them as those two members standing up for the electoral vote chosen by the voters of Colorado?

I would consider it the latter.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federalist Paper 68