Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When you "privatize" something, doesn't that mean that you have to show a profit? (Original Post) Yavin4 Nov 2016 OP
sometimes a guaranteed profit KT2000 Nov 2016 #1
Nah! HassleCat Nov 2016 #2
Reduce Services - Raise Prices..... global1 Nov 2016 #3
Nope, just that the service is run not by a public entity. mwooldri Nov 2016 #4
"privatizing" is a manipulative word used to make people think of free enterprise. unblock Nov 2016 #5
If an endeavor shows a profit, they take the credit. lpbk2713 Nov 2016 #6
i pay more for medicare part b and c because DesertFlower Nov 2016 #7
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
2. Nah!
Tue Nov 29, 2016, 06:04 PM
Nov 2016

It just means your big contributors have to suck up load of yax dollars, then leave the public holding the empty bag. Unless, as a final insult, they shit in the bag, so it's not empty.

mwooldri

(10,299 posts)
4. Nope, just that the service is run not by a public entity.
Tue Nov 29, 2016, 06:13 PM
Nov 2016

The British Railways is an example of privatization gone right and wrong. The profits are kept by the companies, the losses are absorbed by the government. A couple of companies thought that the East Coast Main Line from London to Edinburgh would be a money maker. Nevertheless this is one notable example of where a private company (National Express) walked away and where the government had to step in. Fortunately Richard Branson (who knows how to run a railway) stepped up and is now running things on that line. If this is an example of what can happen to a railway... what would happen if Medicare was fully privatized?

unblock

(52,115 posts)
5. "privatizing" is a manipulative word used to make people think of free enterprise.
Tue Nov 29, 2016, 06:21 PM
Nov 2016

as if the government is no longer involved. it is, in a big way, by providing vast money in the form of funding, subsidies, tax breaks, whatever.

what they're really outsourcing is operations, pricing discretion, some of the policy particulars, etc. but a ton of money comes from the government.

so the "private" businesses can operate at what would otherwise be a loss without government help, but still make a "profit" once you add in the government loot.

DesertFlower

(11,649 posts)
7. i pay more for medicare part b and c because
Tue Nov 29, 2016, 06:42 PM
Nov 2016

i have a high income. it keeps going up -- the higher your income is. i'm beginning to think that the rich don't like this.

of course, medicare does not cover everything. you still need a supplemental policy through an insurance company. those policies can be quite costly.

http://www.thespectrum.com/story/life/features/mesquite/2016/11/27/how-much-youll-pay-medicare-2017/94296402/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When you "privatize" some...