General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama made the mistake of working across the aisle
In 2009 he said:
"You know, when I made a series of overtures to the Republicans going over to meet with both Republican caucuses; you know, putting three Republicans in my Cabinet, something that is unprecedented; making sure that they were invited here to the White House to talk about the economic recovery plan all those were not designed simply to get some short-term votes," Obama said. "They were designed to try to build up some trust over time. And I think that as I continue to make these overtures, over time hopefully that will be reciprocated."
So, how did that work out for ya? Let's hope you and all future Democrats have FINALLY learned that lesson.
apcalc
(4,463 posts)JudyM
(29,233 posts)DetlefK
(16,423 posts)The media said, Clinton should include Republicans in her cabinet as a gesture of bipartisanship.
Now that Trump has won? Somehow nobody is talking about how he should include Democrats to bring the country together...
mdbl
(4,973 posts)that's why it's so liberal.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)there are probably not many (any?) Democrats whom could be persuaded to work for Trump (with the possible exception of Tulsi Gabbard?). Hell, he's having a hard time stocking his (mis-)Administration with Republicans or people willing to be part of the looming disaster.
JHan
(10,173 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)... a willingness to work across the aisle whenever the opportunity presents itself. I don't hold out hopes for such opportunities in the near term, but I sure don't want my party to become a left version of Mitch McConnell's.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)... Trump/the GOP anything they want even if there's a potential for getting something good for the American people. That was Mitch McConnell's stupid, destructive philosophy. I want to stress that I don't hold out hope for much of that sort of potential. But that should be our focus.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)If he hadn't tried to work with the GOP, we would have exactly NOTHING accomplished instead of what we have.
What we have is not enough but it's better than NOTHING.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
mdbl
(4,973 posts)I would like to know what you know.
randome
(34,845 posts)Increased infrastructure spending.
Increased federal contractor minimum wage to $10.10.
Scolded Congress into approving a $305 billion highways bill.
Is it enough? No. It's never enough. Kicking and screaming at Congress would have gotten us a lot less.
http://pleasecutthecrap.com/obama-accomplishments/
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
mdbl
(4,973 posts)That's all we got and nothing since. The infrastructure spending since then was at the expense of any social program out there. Sorry, it 's not enough for me to get excited about since the ACA may be no more in a year or two. Working across the aisle has been to the benefit of no one but a few. The only other accomplishments by Obama were by executive order. I expressly asked for laws. But you can believe all those executive orders will stand the test of time, if you want to.
sylvanus
(122 posts)sylvanus
(122 posts)What we got was some watered down republican bullshit.
Nothing that Obama was responsible for could be considered a democratic or progressive policy.
We elected Republican lite and the Repub.'s kept moving the center further right.
Remember when Obama was first running, he said the President he most admired was Regan,
ya'll should've taken him at his word.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)I think that he got elected on the theory- enunciated in his brilliant 2004 DNC Speech- that he could and would be a unifying POTUS after the divisive Bush II (mis-)Administration and that everybody would naturally come to get together in order to get out of the financial crisis we were in at the time. Republicans, obviously taking their cues from Rush Limbaugh, ultimately decided that they weren't going to bow down or cower to a popularly elected African-American Democratic POTUS and a Democratic Congress, so they resolved that they were going to obstruct him and Democrats in Congress at every turn and in any which way they could so that they could make him an unpopular one-term POTUS and keep him from getting anything positive accomplished and certainly had no interest in helping fix any problems that President Obama's predecessor had caused. President Obama, I think, eventually figured out that Republicans weren't interested in working with him to tend to the welfare of the country but his window to accomplish things largely closed in 2010 due to losing (and never regaining) full Democratic support in Congress.
mythology
(9,527 posts)Your approach guarantees no change.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)mdbl
(4,973 posts)and has no Social Security Disability to deal with it either.
Skittles
(153,147 posts)Hillary would NEVER have done that
StevieM
(10,500 posts)And I think he knows it.