Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

C_U_L8R

(44,998 posts)
1. So they sell off tax free now while things are pretty good.
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 10:25 PM
Dec 2016

And after Trump trashes the world, they buy it back for pennies.
Keep your eyes on these playahs.

rzemanfl

(29,556 posts)
2. I think they will resign "to spend more time with their families"
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 10:27 PM
Dec 2016

and let the next billionaire in line stick it to us.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
3. I saved a nice bundle of tax money when I sold a house at a loss.
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 10:28 PM
Dec 2016

It's the same thing, essentially.

While we might not like the idea of a certain person "getting away with" low or zero taxes, I have heard nothing to suggest such a thing was not legal.
So it may be the tax law that needs looking at, in this case.

rzemanfl

(29,556 posts)
4. This is many orders of magnitude greater than selling your house.
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 10:33 PM
Dec 2016

Years of gains-no taxes. More money than you and I will ever see. The Billionaires Boy's Club.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
5. But essentially the same tax law.
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 11:43 PM
Dec 2016

I don't like it either, but the truth is this particular law allows losses to be used as an offset of taxes due.

Statistical

(19,264 posts)
6. It isn't that it allows offset of losses. It allows deferring taxes on profits.
Sat Dec 3, 2016, 12:58 AM
Dec 2016

However it is the law. That being said some of Trump's cabinet will make hundreds of millions if not billions in deferred taxes as a result of "serving the public". Legal but pretty vomit inducing.

rzemanfl

(29,556 posts)
8. I don't think it is "deffered" it looks to me like tax free profit-period.
Sat Dec 3, 2016, 08:10 AM
Dec 2016

They are not "serving the public" they are "servicing the public" in the most carnal sense of that phrase.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,393 posts)
9. This is not a deferral of paying taxes. It is also not available to just anybody.
Sat Dec 3, 2016, 04:34 PM
Dec 2016
Cabinet Picks To Save Millions In Taxes Thanks To Ethics Rules

....
The legal tax maneuver, offered for years to executive-branch appointees and employees, was designed to help ease the sting of being forced to suddenly sell investments.

But the federal program, encoded in Section 2634 of federal ethics laws and known as a "certificate of divestiture," has never been tested quite like this. Trump's Cabinet picks have amassed assets worth billions of dollars from lifetimes in banking and investing, much of which they will be able to sell tax-free.
....

When new officials join the government, federal ethics advisers review their holdings and instruct them on how they should cut through entanglements, such as recusing themselves or divesting stocks and other assets in cases where potential conflicts could arise.

People who sell company stock typically have to pay taxes on any profits, known as capital gains. But the divestiture benefit allows officials to skip that tax bill, as long as they reinvest the gains into assets where conflicts are less likely, such as U.S. Treasury bonds or diversified mutual funds. ... It is unclear what Trump officials will be asked to divest, but the tax savings on sold-off holdings could be monumental. Trump's choice for education secretary, Betsy DeVos, is the heiress of a family Amway fortune worth roughly $5 billion.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OMFG!