Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPortage County WI recount just completed 4PM
We are done here...that's all I have for now.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 2194 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Portage County WI recount just completed 4PM (Original Post)
jodymarie aimee
Dec 2016
OP
riversedge
(70,056 posts)1. Thanks for your help jodymarie
Farmgirl1961
(1,493 posts)2. Thank you!
I'm curious to see what the final recount looks like.
LisaM
(27,792 posts)3. Good, now you can all get back to saving children....
since recounts are apparently the biggest obstacle to this.
FBaggins
(26,715 posts)4. With 75% reporting earlier today there was essentially no change
There was a net gain of one vote for Clinton (nine extra votes for Trump, ten for Hillary).
rgbecker
(4,817 posts)7. Makes me wonder what happened to those votes the first time around!!?
19 votes just found, out of the blue? WTF.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)8. If they are using the ovals that are filled and scanned
voters might not have filled in enough of the bubble (or done a check or x in it), in which case the machine wouldn't read it as a vote - but a person looking at a ballot can rule that there was clear voter intent.
rgbecker
(4,817 posts)9. Thanks for this...I guess it was a recount by hand.
lady lib
(2,933 posts)5. Thank you for your service. (nt)
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)6. Thank you for volunteering, jodymarie.
And for reporting back to us!