Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
Wed Dec 7, 2016, 03:05 PM Dec 2016

Here's an Electoral College ballot from the State of Florida (2012). Notice anything?

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-0qb1shFkoyI/UNErzIQ8_nI/AAAAAAAAGFU/EvSekd2Yfzg/s1600/electoral+college.jpg

Those still imagining a faithless Elector revolt need to understand that this is not a Constitutionally-protected secret ballot. It is a formal ceremonial vote, prepared by whichever Party won the State's Electors. Additionally, the ballots are distributed and collected in a public setting (usually the State Legislative chamber), so the opportunity to substitute an alternative name is limited, and an attempt to do so could be construed as a violation of the State law requiring an EC vote for the winning candidate, and effectively a resignation from the EC, in which case a willing alternate can be substituted.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's an Electoral College ballot from the State of Florida (2012). Notice anything? (Original Post) brooklynite Dec 2016 OP
A guest on Chris Hayes 'All In' said that the SCOTUS has ruled that the Constitution flamin lib Dec 2016 #1
Not quite true dems_rightnow Dec 2016 #2

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
1. A guest on Chris Hayes 'All In' said that the SCOTUS has ruled that the Constitution
Wed Dec 7, 2016, 03:54 PM
Dec 2016

does not allow a state to dictate the casting of EC votes. It has no authority under law, only moral intimidation. Don't have a cite cause it was on the teevee.

dems_rightnow

(1,956 posts)
2. Not quite true
Wed Dec 7, 2016, 04:10 PM
Dec 2016

The Supreme Court definitely has ruled that states may require electors to cast their votes in a certain manner. But they have never ruled on whether punishments for not so voting are enforceable.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's an Electoral Colle...