General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSofia Vergara: US actress faces lawsuit 'from own embryos'
The embryos, named Emma and Isabella, are listed in Louisiana court documents obtained by the New York Post.
...
Louisiana is considered a "pro-life" state and under its law a fertilised egg is seen as a "juridical person".
The Louisiana case names a trustee as plaintiff, but not Mr Loeb himself. The suit asks that the embryos be transferred to Mr Loeb so that they can be born and receive their inheritance.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38252457
The kind of idiocy that results from calling a fertilised egg a "juridicial person".
Egnever
(21,506 posts)People's greed has no limits. What a completely disgusting grab for money.
haele
(12,640 posts)the embryos that he and Ms. Vergara (his then wife) froze for later in-vitro to go into his new wife, so he wouldn't, like go to hell because those embryos don't become the twin girls he imagines they'll be, or something like that.
In-vitro doesn't work that way anyway; there's a good chance those embryos won't take as it is. My brother and his wife went through the process after they had a dozen fertilized embryos in storage; three times using three embryos each time before any of them actually "took" and she became pregnant. And their doctor indicated that there was a possibility that the chance of pregnancy would decrease slightly the longer they were stored, depending on genetics and the age of the woman the eggs would be implanted in.
So - there's just two fertilized embryos that have been sitting for how long? How old is Mr. Loeb's new wife, and does she have a fertility issue? If one believes in a God that directs everything that happens naturally, chances are, those "little girls" may not be meant to be born.
The point ultimately is that Ms. Vergara doesn't want him to use her eggs for his religious vanity.
Haele
shraby
(21,946 posts)for all the years since she had them frozen.
lame54
(35,262 posts)Demit
(11,238 posts)lame54
(35,262 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)mercuryblues
(14,522 posts)he is the one who set up the trust. He chose Louisiana because of their laws to say the embryos are real live children and being denied the rights to their inheritance. IOW court shopping.
You know what would be funny. Somehow the embryos are accidentally thawed, rendered useless. Then Vergara gets 1/2 the inheritance, using his legal argument. How fast do you think he would argue that as embryos they were not living beings?
lunasun
(21,646 posts)infertility technology eventually , such as creating a group of embryo with the intention some will not survive due to the individual women's reproductive health is not pro-life
That some idiot like trump won partially by getting the anti choice vote is very scary . They will always go with whoever will say I am pro life law
Which is anti choice for others
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)Did the frozen embryos actually agree - in writing - to allow the lawsuit?
Ilsa
(61,690 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)He set up a trust fund for the eggs and would like to get it back?
If the eggs have some recognition as life forms, Could Sofia be liable for "child support."