Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

RKP5637

(67,104 posts)
1. The question is, as usual, will Americans really do anything about it. Voting machines, for example
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:33 AM
Dec 2016

have had flaws for years, often nothing done. I don't see the US as very proactive except in arguing and fighting.

spanone

(135,823 posts)
4. my hope is that something like this will give us the impetus to change things.
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:38 AM
Dec 2016

having russia as part of our election process may be what we need to move people.

RKP5637

(67,104 posts)
6. I would hope so. I'm sure many want to do something, but I don't think the Trump Regime will
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:52 AM
Dec 2016

do anything to help at all.

malthaussen

(17,187 posts)
2. I wonder how much the screams of outrage are from amour-propre.
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:37 AM
Dec 2016

We Americans like to think we're the most computer-savvy people on the planet. That our computers could be so comprehensively hacked by a foreign power must really sting.

-- Mal

AnotherMother4Peace

(4,242 posts)
7. Almost as frightening is that Russia hacked the RNC computers & did not release
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:54 AM
Dec 2016

the ill gotten information. This leads me to believe that there was blackmail, threats, and deals made.

spanone

(135,823 posts)
9. that's why the gop should be as outraged about this....next time it very well could be them
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:57 AM
Dec 2016

this should be 100% bi-partisan

although it will not be.

global1

(25,241 posts)
8. I Don't Know Much About How Easy It Is To Hack - But....
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:56 AM
Dec 2016

I'm kind of blown away as to how suseptible we are to being hacked as a country. One would think that governmental computers would have all kinds of safeguards to prevent hacking - yet look what happened.

I hope we learn something from this incident and work on computer systems that make it extremely difficult if not impossible to hack.

In a computerized world that we all live in now - everyday the stakes are getting greater and greater because of this suseptibility.

Are our nuclear codes at risk?

Just think of the consequences of that - that a foreign power can hack in to our nuclear codes and start something that makes it look like we started ourselves.

For example: Why does a country like Iran need to develop nuclear weapons when they could maybe more easily hack into our computers and use our own weapons against us.

We need as a country to put as much money and effort as possible to protect ourselves from future hacking.

I hate this feeling of vulnerability.

Everyday our world is getting more dangerous and sinister because of computers.

I know I probably sound naive and I probably am about this - but the prospects of future hacking are pretty scary.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
10. "Hack" has become a meaningless term - Podesta, for example, was "spear-phished" - very low-tech.
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 12:34 PM
Dec 2016
SecureWorks concluded Fancy Bear had sent Podesta an email on 19 March 2016 that had the appearance of a Google security alert, but actually contained a misleading link—a strategy known as spear-phishing. (This tactic has also been used by hackers to break into the accounts of other notable persons, such as Colin Powell). The link—which used Bitly, a URL shortening service—brought Podesta to a fake log-in page where he entered his Gmail credentials.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podesta_emails

This is not about cyber war. This is about individuals giving up their credentials to a social engineering attack.

And why was Podesta sending and receiving sensitive emails through Google in the first place?

And why didn't he delete them as soon as he read them so that compromise of his account would only result in very limited damage?

Security requires people who are trustworthy, competent and diligent.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»if russians could hack th...