RED ALERT: The common FUD meme across multiple forums on this bombshell is now "evidence"

[uponit7771]

Here's the retort

FUD's main counter to the WAPO story is the false argument of setting a high or false bar

- There was ENOUGH evidence for the CIA to go to congress on the issue, no one is disputing that at all... that there's ENOUGH evidence to talk about it is actionable ENOUGH.

- That there was an outside state actor who weighed in on one of the candidates is HORRIBLE and actionable in and of itself. Whether or not they were a factor is IRRELEVANT (kinda like attempted murder is a jail-able offense in and of itself) that it was done is though.

- Benedict Donald and his Band Of Bigots is NOT... NOT denying any of the reports that Russia helped him at all.

- Benedict Donald INVITED the Russians to intervene on behalf of himself before election day

Side notes

- In the WAPO story Turtle McFuckLips not only denied a joint statement but a bipartisan effort in PROTECTION OF THE STATE LEVEL BALLOT MACHINES !!!


P.S. CIA RETORT - Today's CIA is not the same CIA as 13 years ago... that has worked so far in shutting the red herring of an argument up

[rzemanfl]

1. I am stealing Benedict Donald. We live in a kleptocracy, so tough beans.

I will reconsider if you PM me the copyright.

[OilemFirchen]

2. There is forensic evidence in the hacked emails themselves.

That some of DU's alt-left are now promoting the Republican defense is, sadly, unsurprising.

[uponit7771]

3. Yes, and notice when these denials started... not during the campaign when there was supposition of

... this but now.

Fuck Benedict Donald

[OilemFirchen]

10. Having spent precious little time here since the election...

it was a bit curious to watch Sean Spicer employ this laughable defense, then to log on and suddenly see it deployed in a handful of OPs.

I'm guessing that the DU swamp has been restocked?

[KittyWampus]

20. slowly but surely.

[Beartracks]

4. I wonder if he "jokingly" invited the Russian hack...

... because he couldn't help himself to totally keep the secret that they were already involved. A little bit of gleeful braggadocio... Same as claiming the election was rigged, right out in the open, because you knew it was in fact rigged for you.

===============

[uponit7771]

5. Yeap, not out of character for that bastard

[canetoad]

22. Yeah, exactly what I've been thinking

His ego is so great he could not possibly restrain himself from alluding to the 'rigged' election. This is the nature of DFT; the bullshit and bluster always has a deep grain of truth.

[irisblue]

6. FUDfear uncertainty doubt?

[uponit7771]

8. Yeap, usually a paid band of poster with relative LPC across forums... they work when regular post

... counts are low.

[JimBeard]

14. Hey hey. I have a very low post count because of the meltdown. I have about another 1500 post

on the Jim Beard account than this on JimBeard (No space) I just paid money and re-entered. I groan when I rehear about the low post story.

[uponit7771]

16. FUD stands out though, they're usually hit and runs and rarely stay to defend a position...

... they stand out because of usual hit and runs

[Maraya1969]

18. ACK!!! Please explain the letters for the remedial group of which I am one.

[JimBeard]

9. When you find out, let me know.

[uponit7771]

15. Yes, it means Fear Uncertainty Doubt... mostly people with relative low post counts going on

.. political forums with false arguments to turn positions

[Maraya1969]

19. Yea the ones that say, "That won't work" --- I would like climb through this little white and gray

screen and slap them across their room.

[canetoad]

23. Didn't know that

Thought it stood for Fuck You Donald.

[Turbineguy]

7. Turtle McFuckLips

I feel kind of sorry for his wife. "Oh, Honey, they've got a new nickname for you on DU!"

[mopinko]

17. i'm tellin ya. we need a duzy button.

that have their own little churning mechanism, like the greatest page.

tell the guys. i have bugged them enough.

[TrekLuver]

11. Isn't that Kurt Eichenwald article evidence as well?

http://www.newsweek.com/vladimir-putin-sidney-blumenthal-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-benghazi-sputnik-508635

[uponit7771]

13. Like whoa, get that to WAPO... I remember this shit too !!

[yallerdawg]

12. Evidence?

We don't need no stinkin' evidence.

FUD, indeed.

[KittyWampus]

21. No matter how many links are presented, the pretense of skepticism is precious.