Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis Political Theorist Predicted the Rise of Trumpism. His Name Was Hunter S. Thompson.
https://www.thenation.com/article/this-political-theorist-predicted-the-rise-of-trumpism-his-name-was-hunter-s-thompson/This Political Theorist Predicted the Rise of Trumpism. His Name Was Hunter S. Thompson.
In Hells Angels, the gonzo journalist wrote about left-behind people motivated only by an ethic of total retaliation. Sound familiar?
By Susan McWilliams
Today 8:00 am
In late March, Donald Trump opened a rally in Wisconsin by mocking the states governor, Scott Walker, who had just endorsed his Republican opponent, Ted Cruz. He came in on his Harley, Trump said of Walker, but he doesnt look like a motorcycle guy.
The motorcycle guys, he added, like Trump.
It has been fifty years since Hunter S. Thompson published the definitive book on motorcycle guys: Hells Angels: The Strange and Terrible Saga of the Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs. It grew out of a piece first published in The Nation one year earlier. My grandfather, Carey McWilliams, editor of the magazine from 1955 to 1975, commissioned the piece from Thompsonit was the gonzo journalists first big break, and the beginning of a friendship between the two men that would last until my grandfather died in 1980. Because of that family connection, I had long known that Hells Angels was a political book. Even so, I was surprised, when I finally picked it up a few years ago, by how prophetic Thompson is and how eerily he anticipates twenty-first-century American politics. This year, when people asked me what I thought of the election, I kept telling them to read Hells Angels.
Thompson observed that the Hells Angels were alienated from a changing America in which they felt left behind.
Most people read Hells Angels for the lurid stories of sex and drugs. But that misses the point entirely. Whats truly shocking about reading the book today is how well Thompson foresaw the retaliatory, right-wing politics that now goes by the name of Trumpism. After following the motorcycle guys around for months, Thompson concluded that the most striking thing about them was not their hedonism, but their ethic of total retaliation against a technologically advanced and economically changing America in which they felt theyd been counted out and left behind. Thompson saw the appeal of that retaliatory ethic. He claimed that a small part of every human being longs to burn it all down, especially when faced with great and impersonal powers that seem hostile to your very existence. In the United States, a place of ever greater and more impersonal powers, the ethic of total retaliation was likely to catch on.
What made that outcome almost certain, Thompson thought, was the obliviousness of Berkeley, California, types who, from the safety of their cocktail parties, imagined that they understood and represented the downtrodden. The Berkeley types, Thompson thought, were not going to realize how presumptuous they had been until the downtrodden broke into one of those cocktail parties and embarked on a campaign of rape, pillage, and slaughter. For Thompson, the Angels werent important because they heralded a new movement of cultural hedonism, but because they were the advance-guard for a new kind of right-wing politics. As Thompson presciently wrote in the Nation piece he later expanded on in Hells Angels, that kind of politics is nearly impossible to deal with using reason or empathy or awareness-raising or any of the other favorite tools of the left.
snip//
Theres no doubt about it: trouble lies ahead. That Hells Angels foresaw all this fifty years ago underscores the depth and seriousness of Thompson as a political thinker and of ours as a singularly dangerous time. Trumpism is about something far more serious than Trump, something that has been brewing and building for generations. Let us take Thompsons cautions seriously, then, so that this time we Berkeley types are not naïve about what we face. Otherwise were all liable to get stomped.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1885 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This Political Theorist Predicted the Rise of Trumpism. His Name Was Hunter S. Thompson. (Original Post)
babylonsister
Dec 2016
OP
MrScorpio
(73,630 posts)1. This passage says it all about the modern Republican Party:
ts not hard to see in the demographics, the words, and the behavior of Trump supporters an ethic of total retaliation at work. These are men and women who defend their vote by saying things like: I just wanted people to know that Im here, that I count. These are men and women whose scorn of political correctness translates into: You cant make me talk the way that you want me to talk, even if that way of talking is nicer and smarter and better. These are men and women whose denials of climate change are gleeful denials of scientific expertise in a world where scientific experts have unquestioned intellectual respect and social status. These are men and women who seemed to applaud the incompetence of Trumps campaign because competence itself is associated with membership in the elite.
Thompson would want us to see this: These are men and women who know that, by all intellectual and economic standards, they cannot win the game. So whether it be out of self-protection or an overcompensation for their own profound sense of shame, they lash out at politicians, judges, scientists, teachers, Wall Street, universities, the media, legislatureseven at elections. They are not interested in contemplating serious reforms to the system; they are either too pessimistic or too disappointed to believe that is possible. So the best they can do is adopt a position of total irreverence: to show they hate the players and the game.
Thompson would want us to see this: These are men and women who know that, by all intellectual and economic standards, they cannot win the game. So whether it be out of self-protection or an overcompensation for their own profound sense of shame, they lash out at politicians, judges, scientists, teachers, Wall Street, universities, the media, legislatureseven at elections. They are not interested in contemplating serious reforms to the system; they are either too pessimistic or too disappointed to believe that is possible. So the best they can do is adopt a position of total irreverence: to show they hate the players and the game.