Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 04:46 PM Dec 2016

Sham populism, shameless plutocracy - By Katrina vanden Heuvel

December 20 at 8:00 AM

In a speech at the Heritage Foundation last week, former House speaker Newt Gingrich portrayed President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration as a historic moment for conservatism. “This is the third great effort to break out of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt model” of government, he said, following the Reagan revolution” of the 1980s and Gingrich’s Contract with America in the 1990s.

Such a bold proclamation may sound peculiar after Trump’s fellow Republicans spent much of 2016 attacking him as a heretic who threatened the party’s commitment to right-wing policy orthodoxies. On the campaign trail, Trump explicitly disavowed cuts to safety-net programs that have long been a hallmark of the GOP agenda. “I’m not going to cut Social Security like every other Republican, and I’m not going to cut Medicare or Medicaid,” he pledged.

But as his administration takes shape, Trump is sending signals to the right that he is prepared to fulfill their wildest fantasies. With his sham populism giving way to shameless plutocracy, it appears increasingly likely that Trump will attempt to reverse more than the progress achieved over the past eight years under President Obama. The tremendous advances and reforms of the 20th century — from the New Deal to the Great Society — may be on the chopping block.

So far, Trump’s Cabinet picks offer perhaps the clearest evidence of how he intends to govern and how much is really at stake. In addition to surrounding himself with billionaires, bankers and crony capitalists, Trump has nominated several candidates to run federal agencies whose functions they fundamentally oppose on ideological grounds. As Jamelle Bouie writes of Trump’s Cabinet in Slate, “It’s less a team for governing the country than a mechanism for dismantling its key institutions.”

Take his choice to lead the Environmental Protection Agency. Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt is not just skeptical of “excessive” regulations; he is a climate change denier who’s been waging a legal war against the EPA. Health and Human Services nominee Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) is not just a critic of the Affordable Care Act; he is openly opposed to what he calls “the federal government’s intrusion into medicine through Medicare.” Former Texas governor Rick Perry is not just underqualified to lead the Department of Energy; he famously wants to abolish it — when he can manage to remember the department’s name. (Notably, Perry has also called Social Security a “Ponzi scheme” and “a crumbling monument to the failure of the New Deal.” )

more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/sham-populism-shameless-plutocracy/2016/12/20/dd52a8e4-c602-11e6-bf4b-2c064d32a4bf_story.html?utm_term=.c3a53495a188&wpisrc=nl_popns&wpmm=1

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

haele

(12,647 posts)
3. The third great effort to break out of the FDR model and crawl back into the Harding model of gov.
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 04:57 PM
Dec 2016

Gingrich, for a historic analysist, you are a Troglodyte looking over a Monopoly board.

More animal than human. It's all about meeee and the amount of money I can amass.

Haele

CousinIT

(9,239 posts)
4. Trump and Bannon BOTH said they wanted to burn it all down - US govt & economy
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 05:08 PM
Dec 2016

Why is it no one believes them?

Trump deliberately appointed destructive people to head agencies - people who DESPISE those agencies and their intended purpose for existence - so that those appointees could destroy those agencies.

Trump and his little band of Satans have torches in hand ready to literally skin this country alive and burn it at the stake.

BELIEVE IT. Because that's what's happening now and that IS the full explanation behind his appointments.

HE. LIED. to Americans to get in office. Now, he's going to DESTROY the US government and the US economy.

MILLIONS will DIE needlessly or end up in abject poverty (who would not have with social safety nets which will be summarily torched).

And Bannon and Trump and the Koch Bros and their goddamned John Birch Society will LAUGH LAUGH LAUGH all the way to the bank -- because NONE OF THIS will affect them in any way -- except perhaps to make them even richer.

If there is a HELL and a SATAN - we're staring it in the face.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
6. I really can't get my mind around how the average American, regardless of political affiliation,
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 05:59 PM
Dec 2016

can possibly think this is going to be good for them or the country. It's like RW voters are just so filled with hate, they can't even see the shitstorm of a future that they are going to be victimized by as well. I really can't understand it for the life of me.

Most people will need these programs at some time in their life or at least members of their family will. What could possibly align them with the agenda of the far right?

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
7. They were desperate for real change and ending corruption.
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 07:19 PM
Dec 2016

Trump told them what they wanted to hear. Fox and RW media spewed hateful, lying propaganda that they fell for.

The Democratic Party started taking corporate money and ignored unions and minorities as the price for the corporate money!

muriel_volestrangler

(101,307 posts)
5. The FDR model - the FDR that is overall top of scholar surveys for best president?
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 05:49 PM
Dec 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States#Scholar_survey_results

Oh yes, I can see why Gingrich wants to leave his 'model' behind. God forbid there's competent government that pulls the country together in a crisis, fixes the economy, and then wins the most vital war the world's ever seen ...

raging moderate

(4,297 posts)
8. Gingrich had a contract ON America.
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 07:37 PM
Dec 2016

I think it was Rep. Thomas Gray who said, "The American people are tired of being trickled on."

eppur_se_muova

(36,259 posts)
9. Third sham's the charm.
Wed Dec 21, 2016, 12:10 PM
Dec 2016

There was nothing of any substance to any of these "movements" -- Reagan was all show business (Potemkin village style), and Newt's "contract" was meaningless, violated by the Repugs within weeks. All these conservatives have accomplished by their "revolutions" is a coarsening of civic discourse. They don't just say it's acceptable to demean their political opposition as moral degenerates and traitors, they have made it their whole policy, and the sum total of their arguments. "We hate you, which means you are wrong by definition. We'll do everything possible, legal or not, to defeat you." If there's anything deeper than that to conservative "philosophy", it's well hidden.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sham populism, shameless ...