American Foreign Policy Has an Empathy Problem
For much of the past two decades, and certainly since the invasion of Iraq in 2003, progressive foreign policy has been defined by what it is againstprimarily, an aggressive neoconservatism that has led us into multiple wars in the Middle East and has sacrificed important domestic goals in favor of a global crusade for American dominance. But it is much less clear what a progressive foreign policy stands for, and what it would look like in practice. It is especially important to try to define one now, after the election of Donald Trump.
Progressives would be wise to avoid two tendencies on this issue. The first is defining a progressive foreign policy as simply a rejection of whatever Trump says or does. Of course, he has already appointed some dangerous extremists to important foreign-policy positions, and Trump himself is erratic at best, seemingly incapable of focusing in a sustained way on difficult foreign-policy problems. But some of his statements his calls to work with Russia, end Americas destructive wars, and create more equitable trade agreementsare not so far removed from ones that we ourselves have embraced. We will need to champion our own progressive version of these positions rather than simply reject them outright.
The second tendency we should avoid is falling into nostalgia for the Obama era. Of course, we should defend the administrations notable achievements in beginning the normalization of relations with Cuba and helping to engineer a nuclear agreement with Iran. We can also laud the intent behind some of the presidents wonderfully crafted speeches that were meant to repair Americas image in the world. But we must also remember the shortcomings of Obamas foreign policy: his perpetuation of the Global War on Terror (albeit without the Bush-era name), including an undeclared drone war stretching from the Maghreb to South Asia, and an unnecessary but dangerous new Cold War with Russia. And while this magazine endorsed Hillary Clinton against Trump in the general election, we actively opposed many of the so-called liberal interventionist policies that she favored.
For all the democratic promise of the movement that Senator Bernie Sanders inspired, he didnt leave us with a series of foreign-policy proposals to guide our thinking for the future. Thats the unfinished business we take up in this forum. We asked six leading progressive thinkers to offer their thoughts on what the defining ideas and principles of a progressive foreign policy should be as we look beyond the 2016 election (see Related Articles for the companion pieces). Its the beginning of a discussion that our nation must have, but not, by any means, the end.
https://www.thenation.com/article/american-foreign-policy-has-an-empathy-problem/