Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 02:43 PM Dec 2016

Paul Ryan wants to garnish the paychecks of "grandstanding" House members.

Ryan Proposes Fines, Ethics Moves on Grandstanding House Members



Under the proposed new rules package, which was seen by Bloomberg, members could face a $500 fine through deductions to their paychecks for a first offense of using electronic photography or audio or visual recording, as well as for broadcasting from the chamber’s floor. A $2,500 fine would be leveled for the next such offense and each subsequent violation.

The new rules also clarify which conduct is to be deemed disorderly or disruptive during floor proceedings, including blocking access by other members to microphones or what is known as “the well” -- the front of the chamber.

Some Republicans were upset that Ryan and other leaders didn’t look for ways to punish Democrats, including civil rights icon, Representative John Lewis of Georgia, and Representative John Larson of Connecticut, involved in commandeering the well of the House chamber in June.

The House Sergeant-at-Arms would establish procedures for enforcing the new rules and bans, and the Chief Administrative Officer would be authorized to deduct any fines from members’ salaries for violations.

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-12-24/ryan-proposes-fines-ethics-moves-on-grandstanding-house-members
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Paul Ryan wants to garnish the paychecks of "grandstanding" House members. (Original Post) Miles Archer Dec 2016 OP
Maybe we should do as they do in kacekwl Dec 2016 #1
Hey, Ryan...If there's a "grandstander", it's YOU! PearliePoo2 Dec 2016 #2
Unconstitutional restriction of freedom of speech/expression. no_hypocrisy Dec 2016 #3
Does that include holding hearings on fake scandals? yellowcanine Dec 2016 #4
YES! Except for... Miles Archer Dec 2016 #5
27th Amendment NYC Liberal Dec 2016 #6
Oh, that pesky Constitution Sherman A1 Dec 2016 #10
yeah, that "G-- D----- piece of paper" just ruins every good thing the GOP has going for it! lastlib Dec 2016 #19
He is such a small minded, petty, weasel boy. Greybnk48 Dec 2016 #7
Hey! Stop insulting weasels! lastlib Dec 2016 #8
My apologies to the Mustelidae family! Greybnk48 Dec 2016 #16
Thank you, and you're welcome! lastlib Dec 2016 #17
I'm stuggling with belief that anything rational will occur n/t moonscape Dec 2016 #14
Does he mean doing things like reading Green Eggs and Ham? world wide wally Dec 2016 #9
"No Member shall read 'Green Eggs and Ham' unless properly attired" pinboy3niner Dec 2016 #18
"Grandstanding". As a professional interpreter, let me translate that for you all--- BlancheSplanchnik Dec 2016 #11
How about we garnish HIS paycheck? ALL of it. PERMANENTLY. n/t CousinIT Dec 2016 #12
Expect a steep increase in C-SPAN "outages." briv1016 Dec 2016 #13
So it's verboten to actually display what our elected "Representatives" are saying and doing ? eppur_se_muova Dec 2016 #15
I bet us Dems will gladly pay the fines! GoFundMe!! USALiberal Dec 2016 #20
Just what I was thinking... TBA Dec 2016 #21

kacekwl

(7,016 posts)
1. Maybe we should do as they do in
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 02:49 PM
Dec 2016

other governments and have fistfights in the chamber. Would there be a fine for that ? trump wanted to shake things up .

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
2. Hey, Ryan...If there's a "grandstander", it's YOU!
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 03:06 PM
Dec 2016

Fuck off, you thieving, Medicare/Social Security stealing asshole. And leave Granny alone, you hypocrite!



Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
5. YES! Except for...
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 03:47 PM
Dec 2016

...

1). Hillary & Benghazi

2). Hillary's Emails

3). Ted Cruz reading "Green Eggs & Ham"

That kind of behavior will most likely be sanctioned in the House & Senate, since they get to decide who is "grandstanding."



NYC Liberal

(20,135 posts)
6. 27th Amendment
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 04:08 PM
Dec 2016
No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.

lastlib

(23,221 posts)
19. yeah, that "G-- D----- piece of paper" just ruins every good thing the GOP has going for it!
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 08:34 PM
Dec 2016

They'd love to rip it up, shred it, and burn the shreds until there's no trace of it in existence!

Greybnk48

(10,167 posts)
7. He is such a small minded, petty, weasel boy.
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 04:21 PM
Dec 2016

I'll be so glad when he cycles out, and he will. He has no substance, people will turn on him.

lastlib

(23,221 posts)
8. Hey! Stop insulting weasels!
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 04:32 PM
Dec 2016


The Mustelidae family takes great offense at being compared to that scum-dweller! They are noble beasts in relation to Lyin' Ryan.

But I hear ya! He's a thieving, lying, snizz-nugget!

lastlib

(23,221 posts)
17. Thank you, and you're welcome!
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 08:32 PM
Dec 2016

(I can't really take credit for 'snizz-nugget' (but I wish I could!)--I think it's a derivative of a @MetalOllie concoction. As far as I know, it's fair game for usage. I know it sure sounded like Ryan!)

Happy Holidays to ya!

world wide wally

(21,741 posts)
9. Does he mean doing things like reading Green Eggs and Ham?
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 04:33 PM
Dec 2016

Or voting to repeal Obamacare 50 some times? Or holding still another witch hunt on Hillary?
Then I'm all for it.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
11. "Grandstanding". As a professional interpreter, let me translate that for you all---
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 05:40 PM
Dec 2016

"Democrats", "Disagreement".

eppur_se_muova

(36,261 posts)
15. So it's verboten to actually display what our elected "Representatives" are saying and doing ?
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 07:24 PM
Dec 2016

If it's something that shouldn't be seen, don't do it on the floor of the House. End of discussion.

I don't want Repugs deciding what does and does not constant "grandstanding". Rules enforced by the majority party will never be applied equally to both parties.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Paul Ryan wants to garnis...