Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,741 posts)
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 04:10 PM Dec 2016

Charged a Fee for Getting Arrested, Whether Guilty or Not

WASHINGTON — Corey Statham had $46 in his pockets when he was arrested in Ramsey County, Minn., and charged with disorderly conduct. He was released two days later, and the charges were dismissed.

But the county kept $25 of Mr. Statham’s money as a “booking fee.” It returned the remaining $21 on a debit card subject to an array of fees. In the end, it cost Mr. Statham $7.25 to withdraw what was left of his money.

The Supreme Court will soon consider whether to hear Mr. Statham’s challenge to Ramsey County’s fund-raising efforts, which are part of a national trend to extract fees and fines from people who find themselves enmeshed in the criminal justice system.

Kentucky bills people held in its jails for the costs of incarcerating them, even if all charges are later dismissed. In Colorado, five towns raise more than 30 percent of their revenue from traffic tickets and fines. In Ferguson, Mo., “city officials have consistently set maximizing revenue as the priority for Ferguson’s law enforcement activity,” a Justice Department report found last year.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/charged-a-fee-for-getting-arrested-whether-guilty-or-not/ar-BBxzmo6?li=BBnbcA1&ocid=edgsp

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Charged a Fee for Getting Arrested, Whether Guilty or Not (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2016 OP
K&R for visibility! nt tblue37 Dec 2016 #1
How do you think trump's court will decide this. Ohioblue22 Dec 2016 #2
Double the fees? world wide wally Dec 2016 #7
K&R! The fees provide an incentive to arrest people for BS! n/t Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #3
Agreed ... aggiesal Dec 2016 #18
There's various kinds of government set-ups that provide bad incentives. Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #20
Read your last paragraph awoke_in_2003 Dec 2016 #23
I guess so. Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #25
It is the only thing that does make sense in this country. nt awoke_in_2003 Dec 2016 #26
I think many of those worms avoid public scrutiny too. Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #29
When this country first allowed corporations to exist, ... aggiesal Dec 2016 #40
Agree. I'm curious about their history in this country. Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #42
KICK fleabiscuit Dec 2016 #4
gotta keep the union fully employed and highly paid somehow nt msongs Dec 2016 #5
Another way to keep people away from voting if Ilsa Dec 2016 #6
I had to do a few days once. panader0 Dec 2016 #8
Absolutely outrageous! TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2016 #9
Vulture Justice Growth Engine bucolic_frolic Dec 2016 #10
Yup Johnny2X2X Dec 2016 #11
Have helped friends through this bullshit mountain grammy Dec 2016 #12
Cruelty Capitalism. BlancheSplanchnik Dec 2016 #14
Isn't it though. mountain grammy Dec 2016 #31
Good metaphor. BlancheSplanchnik Dec 2016 #34
And Ramsey County is St. Paul and environs KamaAina Dec 2016 #13
This is another outside the box way to extract the cost of government from the working class Dustlawyer Dec 2016 #15
Exactly. nt the_sly_pig Dec 2016 #37
Luxury SteelSmasher Dec 2016 #16
If Hillary were President Elect... gulliver Dec 2016 #17
Yes! This occurred in a heavily blue area of a blue hughee99 Dec 2016 #19
There may seem to be some irony in that idea for you. gulliver Dec 2016 #22
I felt Clinton was the right person for the job as well, hughee99 Dec 2016 #30
If they call it a tax then the Supreme Court will say it is OK. AngryAmish Dec 2016 #21
Due Process, motherfuckers. /nt localroger Dec 2016 #24
Therefore in Ramsey County, Minn arresting people can be a ... spin Dec 2016 #27
This will stop when more people sue for false arrest. no_hypocrisy Dec 2016 #28
A police department prioritizing generating revenues? How is that not racketeering? tclambert Dec 2016 #32
I don't disagree with the premise of the article... the_sly_pig Dec 2016 #33
I did have to laugh at that line hfojvt Dec 2016 #35
In my state... the_sly_pig Dec 2016 #36
well this was not a parking fine hfojvt Dec 2016 #38
It's all a racket, it's always been a racket MrScorpio Dec 2016 #39
theft by swindle Angry Dragon Dec 2016 #41

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,852 posts)
20. There's various kinds of government set-ups that provide bad incentives.
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 07:13 PM
Dec 2016

I tend to agree with another poster further down this thread about government tax cuts being partly responsible for these kinds of court/jail fees.

Noam Chomsky is far on the left, but even he talks with some empathy about how laws are written in regard to corporations, providing incentives for them to put profits above all else. It's basically illegal for corporate CEO's/managers to knowingly operate otherwise because of how laws were written to protect shareholders from managers who act otherwise.

I also don't understand why laws were written to encourage incorporation! It's harder for owners to be held legally responsible for various wrongdoings if it's a corporation. Private owners often incorporate to avoid costly lawsuits, as I understand it. Why?! Why are the laws written that way unless there's some people who want less direct oversight by owners on how businesses are managed?

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
23. Read your last paragraph
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 08:02 PM
Dec 2016

with the assumption that the rich write the laws that legislatures pass. Then it makes sense.

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,852 posts)
25. I guess so.
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 08:09 PM
Dec 2016

The owners want more money with less risk to themselves, and less managerial oversight (work) from themselves.

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,852 posts)
29. I think many of those worms avoid public scrutiny too.
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 08:21 PM
Dec 2016

Although that's surely a smarter strategy than being more in the public eye while making money off money.

aggiesal

(8,907 posts)
40. When this country first allowed corporations to exist, ...
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 12:14 PM
Dec 2016

laws were written so that they could only exist for up to 40 years.
At 40 years, by law, they were supposed to dissolve.

Corporations are people too!!! Remember that?
But they never die and no corporation ever goes to jail.

The law should be written that Corporations fiduciary responsibility
are to 3 entities:
1) Their Shareholders - for obvious reasons.
2) Their workers - Manufacture product to make profit.
3) Their community - Pay the taxes to build the infrastructure to get product to market,
i.e roads, communications infrastructure, police protection, fire protection, ...

Unfortunately, only 1 is implemented. They could care less about 2 or 3.

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,852 posts)
42. Agree. I'm curious about their history in this country.
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 04:20 PM
Dec 2016

I didn't know about an initial 40 year law.

I know that my father, who grew up during the Great Depression, used to work for very large privately-owned companies after WW2 around this area. Now it's about impossible to find companies that large unless they're incorporated!

Dad was a very hard worker, and the owners rewarded him for his efforts with pay increases and more responsibility over time.

With pretty much every company being a corporation now, the people with the most vested interest in the companies (the owners) don't seem to observe the operations directly... other than what can be learned from financial reports. From what I've observed over the years, the CEO's/managers tend to be more interested in their own well-being than the health of the companies. That makes sense to me given human nature. It's a bit like a wealthy celebrity putting their faith in someone else to manage all of their money... only to find out later that the money was squandered away despite previous reports to the contrary.

Ilsa

(61,690 posts)
6. Another way to keep people away from voting if
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 04:58 PM
Dec 2016

they are behind on paying bogus fees and they fear being picked up at their voting precinct. What a scam.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
8. I had to do a few days once.
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 05:06 PM
Dec 2016

The "mattress" that was once two inches thick had been compressed to one inch.
The food was nearly all inedible. My cell mates were all thieves. (Three different
mates in three days) For these accommodations they charged me $72 a day.
On top of my other fines and fees.. That was many years ago. It's more expensive now.

Johnny2X2X

(18,972 posts)
11. Yup
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 05:37 PM
Dec 2016

Been through this. They hit you with so many fees for anything to do with the courts that they know you can't pay so they can violate you for not paying your probation. It's a racket and they make a fortune off from inmates. They charge you $8 for shampoo that costs 50 cents, $3 a minute for phone calls. Deodorant can cost $9.

Trump and his cable are handing over all of our prisons to giant corporations who will charge even more as they help write stricter laws to ensure more victims. It's sick and as long as this justice system stands we are not a free country.

mountain grammy

(26,598 posts)
12. Have helped friends through this bullshit
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 06:15 PM
Dec 2016

$1000's for a petty offense. Outrageous expenses. American justice is exceptionally cruel.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
13. And Ramsey County is St. Paul and environs
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 06:19 PM
Dec 2016

not Lake Wobegon or someplace else you might expect this $#*! to go on.

Dustlawyer

(10,494 posts)
15. This is another outside the box way to extract the cost of government from the working class
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 06:35 PM
Dec 2016

instead of using taxes. City, state, and federal government is strapped for cash because rich people do not pay their share of already reduced taxes. Most of them cheat on their taxes and get away with it because the IRS is so cash strapped they cannot audit very many cheats. The IRS will not audit big corporations because it costs too much resources.

I blame the media, our corrupt politicians, and the plutocrats who own the media and the politicians. The Koch Libertarian dream is almost upon us. This is what they want and it appears they are going to get it!

This is another example of us wanting to fight the symptoms of the corruption caused by the money in our politicians. By allowing legal bribes in the form of campaign contributions, we allow the wealthy to control our government. Since they make the rules they do not pay much in the way of taxes. The government still needs money to run so they get creative in finding ways for the poor and middle class to pay for it all.

The charges for being arrested and jailed while innocent (or even guilty) are wrong. Ferguson showed how it kept their citizens in poverty and kept adding to their charges and fines when they could not pay. That probably kept many from getting and keeping a job with which to pay the charges/fines. The corrupt politicians still need money for their budgets since they promised their Donors they will give them sweet tax cuts and outrageous no bid contracts

Most of our country's problems are caused by our campaign finance system, its time we all joined together to attack the root problem!!!

gulliver

(13,168 posts)
17. If Hillary were President Elect...
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 06:43 PM
Dec 2016

...this sort of crap would be on the way out. Republicans have created this incredibly corrupt system based on "who pays," the Republican excuse for about half of everything wrong they do.

So, yeah. The guy will pay a booking fee. And if his family wants to give him money to use in jail, they'll pay an account reload fee. If they want to talk with him on the phone, they'll pay out the nose for prison phone system minutes.

If he ends up convicted, some states will make him pay for his "probation costs," essentially they will bill the guy (fresh out of jail) to pay for the costs of the probation system. They will also make him pay "restitution" to the state. So the guy will have thousands in debt for victimless crimes and payable to the state coffers.

Elections have consequences. We could have had Hillary.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
19. Yes! This occurred in a heavily blue area of a blue
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 07:07 PM
Dec 2016

State, run by a Dem governor... Clearly, the republicans are the problem, and surely Hillary would have fixed it.

gulliver

(13,168 posts)
22. There may seem to be some irony in that idea for you.
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 07:46 PM
Dec 2016

There really isn't for me. That's why I voted for Clinton, not because she would fix everything but because I wanted to keep going in the right direction. We lost so much when we failed to get her elected.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
30. I felt Clinton was the right person for the job as well,
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 08:22 PM
Dec 2016

But there seems to be a growing trend to explain all problems as "because republicans" even in places where the republicans may have little influence or control. I don't believe we have any chance to fix these issues if we aren't honest with ourselves, or if we suggest that simply having a Dem president will fix them.

spin

(17,493 posts)
27. Therefore in Ramsey County, Minn arresting people can be a ...
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 08:15 PM
Dec 2016

money making proposition.

Unfortunately this is probably not the only place in our nation where this is true.

the_sly_pig

(740 posts)
33. I don't disagree with the premise of the article...
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 09:28 PM
Dec 2016

But I also don't disagree with charging a booking fee. Charges dismissed happen all the time for a variety of reasons.

The assertion that cops arrest people for a $25 booking fee I feel is unrealistic. In my experience the vast majority of those disturbing the peace are not arrested. Disorderly arrests are reserved for those that make additional effort to be uncooperative or threaten the complainant.

Law enforcement does include running traffic and enforcing traffic law of which there is often a financial penalty.

The reason the Supreme Court will hear a case involving a $25 booking fee is an entirely different matter...

-tsp

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
35. I did have to laugh at that line
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 10:21 PM
Dec 2016

"enmeshed in the criminal justice system".

When in all probability there was a good reason to arrest him, but it somehow was not worth the trouble to press charges.

Not sure why not though, since they often write tickets and charge substantial fees to people. Which people usually pay because the alternative would be to spend even more money on lawyer's fees.

Cost me $370 to drive to the most liberal stinking city in Kansas. A city I once would have loved. Parked my car in the shade and spent half an hour looking for the County Democratic Headquarters. Came back to my car to find a cop waiting there.

Apparently the United States of America is not what I thought it was.

Doubtless though, my story is not as important as this obnoxious jerk's $35.

the_sly_pig

(740 posts)
36. In my state...
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 10:41 PM
Dec 2016

citizens can contest traffic and parking fines without hiring a lawyer. It does take time off work though. I've had ticket fines reduced but not eliminated.

The big cities have meter monitors that enforce parking laws. Most likely they follow a set of assigned patterns or routes. As with many situations, sometimes its being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Not excusing, just sayin....

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
38. well this was not a parking fine
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 04:21 AM
Dec 2016

Apparently I violated some stupid law.

Apparently in America a person is expected to check in with the City Hall to make sure there are no stupid laws on the books that somebody might violate without knowing that said stupid law even existed.

No question that I violated the law, so what was my argument supposed to be in court? That it is unreasonable to expect me to know about laws for cities where I don't live? Well what do they care about reason when they have the power?

MrScorpio

(73,630 posts)
39. It's all a racket, it's always been a racket
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 04:53 AM
Dec 2016

Which is why I'm more wary of the police than I am of criminals.

Who watches the watchers?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Charged a Fee for Getting...