Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Way to Fight Fake News is Real News
The Way to Fight Fake News is Real NewsMONIKA BAUERLEIN
Mother Jones
Until not terribly long ago, there were a few basic rules for success in the news business. One was that publishing verifiably false information would drive audiences away. If you made stuff up, people would cancel your paper or stop watching your network. Media companies practiced basic quality assurance not because they were deeply ethical, but because their bottom line depended on it.
But for platforms like Facebook, the key is not the credibility of the news we see, since they don't produce it. Their success depends on getting us to engage, share, and stick around, which means making sure that there's plenty in our feeds to warm our heart or get us outragedwhether that's a deeply reported exposé or a cruel hoax is a second-order concern.
In their heyday, legacy media left out a lot, mischaracterized a lot, allowed themselves to be taken for a ride (all the way to war). But every day, newspapers and television networks also told us a few things about our politics that had gone through basic vettingand it was understood that they had. "If it's on the news, it must be true" felt naïve, even foolish at the time, but now we know it represented a social contract far more fragile than we realized. We had an agreement, among a wide swath of society, that news media constituted an acceptable mechanism for sorting fact from fiction.
This year, that agreement finally collapsed.
Can we fix this? Yesbut we can't (nor should we want to) go back to a world where media corporations served as our political referee by dint of controlling the distribution of news. We're going to need some other way to establish what we agree on. Some of that will involve technological fixes and artificial intelligence; some will be about the marketplace; and some of it will be about all of us taking part.
But for platforms like Facebook, the key is not the credibility of the news we see, since they don't produce it. Their success depends on getting us to engage, share, and stick around, which means making sure that there's plenty in our feeds to warm our heart or get us outragedwhether that's a deeply reported exposé or a cruel hoax is a second-order concern.
In their heyday, legacy media left out a lot, mischaracterized a lot, allowed themselves to be taken for a ride (all the way to war). But every day, newspapers and television networks also told us a few things about our politics that had gone through basic vettingand it was understood that they had. "If it's on the news, it must be true" felt naïve, even foolish at the time, but now we know it represented a social contract far more fragile than we realized. We had an agreement, among a wide swath of society, that news media constituted an acceptable mechanism for sorting fact from fiction.
This year, that agreement finally collapsed.
Can we fix this? Yesbut we can't (nor should we want to) go back to a world where media corporations served as our political referee by dint of controlling the distribution of news. We're going to need some other way to establish what we agree on. Some of that will involve technological fixes and artificial intelligence; some will be about the marketplace; and some of it will be about all of us taking part.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1966 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Way to Fight Fake News is Real News (Original Post)
portlander23
Dec 2016
OP
Initech
(100,063 posts)1. Also we need to cut Alex Jones' funding.
I'd also love to see him get kicked off Youtube but that might be a hard sell. I have flagged several of his videos for inciting violence and hate speech though!
meow2u3
(24,761 posts)5. We need to cut Alex Jones out of circulation
Preferably, in prison, but in a padded cell if he's proven to be mentally incompetent.
Initech
(100,063 posts)7. Padded cell works!
He can hawk his bullshit conspiracy theories to his tin foil hat!
onecaliberal
(32,826 posts)2. Besides free speech tv I can't name one real news station
portlander23
(2,078 posts)3. Does Democracy Now count?
I guess it's not a whole station, but Amy Goodman is an actual reporter.
onecaliberal
(32,826 posts)4. Her show is on Free Speech TV
KT2000
(20,576 posts)6. and laugh at the fake new sites
people who read and believe the fake news think they know better, are getting the real inside story, and everyone else is stupid because they have the truth.
Fake news thrives on their sites on the internet. They do not even look at the real news sites.