General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNPR Just Offered a Shocking and Disgusting Example of 'Balanced Reporting'
NPR Just Offered a Shocking and Disgusting Example of 'Balanced Reporting'Janet Allon
AlterNet
In the Thursday evening radiocast of WNYC, local affiliate of NPR, a segment on protest demanding Paladino's was introduced using this phrase: "... protesters demanding Paladino step down for what they say are racist comments."
For what they say .... are racist comments. Lots of emphasis added to the "they say."
Really? Only "they say" that? Who are the people who say these comments are not racist, exactly?
The Polack MSgt
(13,186 posts)Unless POC say anything at all. Then you can call them the "real racists"
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)rurallib
(62,406 posts)had more than enough of their equivocating and legitimizing Trump and Republican policies that ruin lives and families.
When they have Jonah Goldberg and Tucker Carlson as camentators, it is time to say goodbye.
We just got an internet radio and I am trying to find good solid news. We started our search in Canada.
world wide wally
(21,740 posts)Just a fake Fox News.
Their biggest donors are the Koch Bros... And it shows.
mopinko
(70,071 posts)cut the cable recently and find myself listening more. ugh. i can stand the flip any more. listening to that stuff once is bad enough. listening twice is unbearable.
fortunately there are a couple good college radio stations around here, including one that runs amy goodman.
Cosmocat
(14,561 posts)LONG a bastion of rock solid, fact based news, which drove the assholes NUTS.
SO, they got their hooks into it, defanged it and now have turned it into just another false flag "news" source.
THIS is why we (the United States) is losing.
Ilsa
(61,692 posts)Stopped donating to them before that. They are duplicitous in pretending to be fair and balanced when their content comes from fox news.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)There was a time when they stopped being public radio and began began relying on funding by the likes of the Koch brothers. The President of NPR for a long time was the former head of Voice of America, the American shortwave propaganda broadcast to the Communist countries.
I finally got fed up with them shortly after the Iraq war started, when the soporific hosts of All Things Considered spent a half hour talking about George Bush's masterful strategy in the Middle East, suggesting that he could very well be the first President to bring peace to the region. Really, NPR?
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,402 posts)Didn't NPR- under pressure- censor a potentially unflattering expose of the Koch Bros? I got heavy into NPR during the early 00's and still enjoy some of their programming but the equivocation in their reporting has largely turned me off to them.
rurallib
(62,406 posts)AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)doc03
(35,324 posts)DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)they beat the drums of war for Bush. Never tried them again.
hatrack
(59,583 posts)They actually apologized on-air after that, so I guess they caught a ration of shit.
Tired of NPR and their fabric-softened news.
bigtree
(85,986 posts)k&r
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Yes, much of their programming is wonderful and edifying. But their overriding world view is insular.
aikoaiko
(34,165 posts)Which is different and not an inappropriate stance when reporting on others.
hunter
(38,309 posts)When some pedophile is caught abducting children, do journalists state that arguments in favor of pedophiles kidnapping children are "controversial?"
Vile racist statements should never be dismissed as merely "controversial"
Fuck NPR. They've been pandering to giant corporations and affluent nervous white guys for too long, guys who think they can't possibly be racist, sexist, or homophobic because they like some black Lesbian artist, guys who never call out the racist, sexist, homophobic scum in their own workplaces and communities.
I actually think that's one of the big weaknesses of the Democratic Party. Nervous, affluent, passively racist, sexist, and homophobic white guys are a minority. They are not oppressed. The Democratic Party ought to be seeking the vote of EVERYONE ELSE. Pandering to these nervous white guys gets in the way of real progress.
aikoaiko
(34,165 posts)Last edited Fri Dec 30, 2016, 03:15 PM - Edit history (1)
In terms of sheer numbers of people who listen and years on the air (over the last 30 years), maybe more than any other single media company, albeit imperfectly at times.
I find your idea that the Democratic party should not seek the votes of white straight males "controversial".
hunter
(38,309 posts)This is the 21st century. So many of them are living in the past.
I'm reminded of my grandparents who were literally Hollywood liberals. My grandfather was "tolerant" of everyone, he worked in the aerospace industry and accepted anyone who could set up the machines and do the math.
My grandma had gay friends, Jewish friends, black friends, and Mexican friends she called "Spanish." She grew up in San Francisco, in a fairly affluent household. Her father was fascinated by airplanes and cinema, interests he passed on to my grandma and her sister, which is how they ended up in Hollywood. My grandma spoke fondly of immigrant housekeepers and cooks her family employed, of Chinese laundrymen, of black laborers and handsome young military men, etc..
But it was merely tolerance. She could say the damnedest racist things, and she was oblivious to many less overt forms of discrimination.
My grandma passed away before I met my wife, but my grandpa called my wife a "Mexican Girl." It was okay to date a Mexican girl from his White California perspective, but when we announced or engagement he was upset. He did not attend our big Catholic wedding. To his credit, he got over it. But he reverted a bit when he had to move to an assisted living /nursing home. The only staff he was tolerant of were the Filipino men. My grandfather was a military officer during World War II and it was clear in the nursing home that he was comfortable with the Filipino men because he considered himself the white officer and them the enlisted men, men who could be trusted. Everyone else was suspect; white men doing "menial" labor, immigrant women, Mexicans... etc.
That's the kind of stuff that should be left in the 20th century, along with the more overt forms of racism, sexism, and homophobia.
marybourg
(12,609 posts)They were reporting on the protest, not on the underlying verbiage.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)sl8
(13,720 posts)I read the linked Alternet article and googled for WNYC pieces on December 19 for 15 or 20 minutes, but didn't find the piece in question.
Did you hear the original WNYC piece? What is your opinion?