Okay, what is this about anyone?

[Kingofalldems]

Link to tweet

[bettyellen]

1. I think their identity is supposed to be shielded?

[tirebiter]

2. Want to ask whatever you're asking in a legible manner, please.

[Kingofalldems]

4. Do me a favor--don't answer.

Is that legible enough for you?

[canetoad]

6. Geez, it was only a typo.

Why the snark?

[rzemanfl]

8. What's illegible about this post? Same font everyone at DU uses. n/t

[TygrBright]

3. SpecOps personnel and families in all services are never supposed to be publicly identified.

For reasons that should be obvious to everyone except opportunistic political weasels with no regard for the safety of serving personnel and the success of the operations on which they engage.

disgustedly,
Bright

[Kingofalldems]

7. Ahh. Now the whole family in danger.

I'm sure Trump will take care of them--not.

[TygrBright]

10. Since our pustulent CinC declines to listen to any briefings on military protocols...

...it appears his sleazy festering staff fistulas don't attend any of them, either.

He actually thought the CIA personnel were giving him a 'standing ovation...'

The only up side to this is that it may discourage even some of the more yobbistically-inclined personnel to participate in unconstitutional and/or illegal operations from some dewy-eyed emotional belief that their CinC gives a rat's ass about them.

sourly,
Bright

[Brother Buzz]

11. Not just the families, but the entire special operations community could be at risk

An industrious person could scour the social media and connect a lot of dots.

[Guilded Lilly]

5. More possible blood on more Cretin hands.

[Angry Dragon]

9. the shit just keeps running out of his mouth