Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NRaleighLiberal

(60,013 posts)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:10 AM Feb 2017

TPM - "Pentagon Points Finger of Blame at Trump" (I hope it was the middle one)

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/pentagon-points-finger-of-blame-at-trump

By JOSH MARSHALL Published FEBRUARY 1, 2017, 11:59 PM EDT

It now seems clear the special ops raid in Yemen did not go according to plan and it went badly. This Times account relates a "a chain of mishaps and misjudgments that plunged the elite commandos into a ferocious 50-minute firefight that also left three others wounded and a $75 million aircraft deliberately destroyed." Chief Petty Officer William Owens was killed in the operation. There also appear to have been a large number of civilian casualties.

Obviously, not every military operation is successful. But there is an extraordinary passage in this article just out from Reuters. What Reuters identifies as "U.S. military officials" says that "[President] Trump approved his first covert counterterrorism operation without sufficient intelligence, ground support or adequate backup preparations."

As a result, three officials said, the attacking SEAL team found itself dropping onto a reinforced al Qaeda base defended by landmines, snipers, and a larger than expected contingent of heavily armed Islamist extremists.
The Pentagon directed queries about the officials' characterization of the raid to U.S. Central Command. The latter pointed only to its statement on Wednesday.

This is an extraordinary and yet also ambiguous statement. It suggests that Trump somehow jumped the gun, approving the mission without adequate intelligence or support. But of course missions come to the President through a chain of command. If there's not enough operational intelligence, he should be told that by his military advisors. It's not like the President can dial into troops in the region directly and order a strike. Available reports suggest that the decision was made at a dinner the President had with Secretary Mattis, the Joint Chiefs Chairman Dunford, Steve Bannon, Mike Flynn, Jared Kushner and Vice President Pence. Dunford is the President's chief military advisor and Mattis is the immediate link in the chain of command. So the highest level people were there to give the President whatever information he needed.

snip

more

and as usual lately,
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TPM - "Pentagon Points Finger of Blame at Trump" (I hope it was the middle one) (Original Post) NRaleighLiberal Feb 2017 OP
blotus is on record for not trusting American Intelligence sources.. did putin screw him over? Cha Feb 2017 #1
+1, good point... he doesn't trust the intel so of course he isn't going to listen uponit7771 Feb 2017 #14
JHC.. a SEAL killed in his first 2 weeks or however long asshole has Cha Feb 2017 #20
Heard on Progress radio that Obama rejected the raid because intelligence was not sufficient brush Feb 2017 #2
Thank you for that.. trump got a SEAL killed and Propaganda Cha Feb 2017 #17
Planning has frequently been an issue with navy spec ops. braddy Feb 2017 #3
has this happened elsewhere? I've not heard about such a fubar'd op uponit7771 Feb 2017 #13
From it's earliest days SEAL team 6 has been seen by some as too Hollywood, too full of itself and braddy Feb 2017 #22
Interesting... Real killers do operate in silence uponit7771 Feb 2017 #32
trump approved it iike an idiot Cha Feb 2017 #19
The Pretender in Queef ProudLib72 Feb 2017 #4
It seems like some voices aren't being madaboutharry Feb 2017 #5
My bet is that trump is the hot head, elleng Feb 2017 #7
I was thinking Flynn and Bannon. madaboutharry Feb 2017 #11
Yes, #1 bannon, #2 flynn. elleng Feb 2017 #21
He hears voices alright. montana_hazeleyes Feb 2017 #30
+1 uponit7771 Feb 2017 #33
Wait until 45 and Bannon call an air raid on Iraq. sarcasmo Feb 2017 #6
Iran? nt Blue_true Feb 2017 #38
45 said we should have took the Iraqi oil. sarcasmo Feb 2017 #39
Leaks are everywhere. People sure do love their country in the civil service. applegrove Feb 2017 #8
Well, we all know that Trump GP6971 Feb 2017 #9
... and now Benedict Donald begins with the US military. See how long this last uponit7771 Feb 2017 #10
Neither Mattis nor Dunford are military intelligence though, are they? Isn't that someone KittyWampus Feb 2017 #12
Benedict Donald, knows more than the generals uponit7771 Feb 2017 #15
Well one version I read GusBob Feb 2017 #16
But Shithead said he knew better than all the military generals combined. Rex Feb 2017 #18
Someone needs to take the toys away from him and put him in time out. NOW! Blaukraut Feb 2017 #23
Who will take his toys away???? burrowowl Feb 2017 #24
It'll have to be congress, sadly Blaukraut Feb 2017 #25
"... the highest level people were there ..." ... Jopin Klobe Feb 2017 #26
why would anyone expect him to do his homework just because lives are on the line fishwax Feb 2017 #27
#TRUMPGHAZI ProudProgressiveNow Feb 2017 #28
God! This is just a fucking game to them. Ryan and McConnell own this. myrna minx Feb 2017 #29
BENGHAZI! Drahthaardogs Feb 2017 #31
draft-dodger-in-chief Comrade Casino accepts full responsibility for the FAIL Achilleaze Feb 2017 #34
Is POTUS supposed to make pressers about Seal deaths? lindysalsagal Feb 2017 #35
Trump is incompetent and his stupidity killed this Seal Gothmog Feb 2017 #36
Kick yardwork Feb 2017 #37
Pretty Incredible that the Pentagon is blaming the president. A mission being planned for months jmg257 Feb 2017 #40
How can the military compare a military operation with the importance of Apprentice ratings? NNadir Feb 2017 #41
i look forwards to the dozens of Benghazi-esque hearings to expose Trump's idiocy! Takket Feb 2017 #42
Don't forget that Pence also approved it. keithbvadu2 Feb 2017 #43
Are we going to have lots of hearings on this for many years? IronLionZion Feb 2017 #44

Cha

(297,123 posts)
1. blotus is on record for not trusting American Intelligence sources.. did putin screw him over?
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:15 AM
Feb 2017
Obviously, not every military operation is successful. But there is an extraordinary passage in this article just out from Reuters. What Reuters identifies as "U.S. military officials" says that " Trump approved his first covert counterterrorism operation without sufficient intelligence, ground support or adequate backup preparations."

Cha

(297,123 posts)
20. JHC.. a SEAL killed in his first 2 weeks or however long asshole has
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:30 AM
Feb 2017

been in charge.

The gd buck stops @ trump

brush

(53,764 posts)
2. Heard on Progress radio that Obama rejected the raid because intelligence was not sufficient
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:16 AM
Feb 2017

trump screwed up by trying to show up Obama and to show what a strong, decisive leader he is.

Translation: "Fools rush in where angels fear to tread."

Cha

(297,123 posts)
17. Thank you for that.. trump got a SEAL killed and Propaganda
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:27 AM
Feb 2017

Central will blame it on Obama or anyone who isn't trump.

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
22. From it's earliest days SEAL team 6 has been seen by some as too Hollywood, too full of itself and
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:53 AM
Feb 2017

somewhat undisciplined for what they should be like, notice that you know little about Delta for example and hear almost nothing about them or their missions and little about Special Forces.

https://theintercept.com/2017/01/10/the-crimes-of-seal-team-6/

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/07/world/asia/the-secret-history-of-seal-team-6.html?_r=0

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
4. The Pretender in Queef
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:19 AM
Feb 2017

likes to play with little green army men. Usually ends with him biting the heads off a couple, though.

applegrove

(118,600 posts)
8. Leaks are everywhere. People sure do love their country in the civil service.
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:22 AM
Feb 2017

Last edited Sat Feb 4, 2017, 04:36 AM - Edit history (1)

GP6971

(31,133 posts)
9. Well, we all know that Trump
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:22 AM
Feb 2017

knows more than the generals. It's obvious (as it has been since he uttered that incredibaly stupid remark) that he knows jack s**t. And now it has gotten people killed.

And he could care less.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
12. Neither Mattis nor Dunford are military intelligence though, are they? Isn't that someone
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:23 AM
Feb 2017

who should have been there?

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
16. Well one version I read
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:26 AM
Feb 2017

The mission was compromised as the enemy knew they were coming ( heard low flying drones or something)

The SEALs coming in intercepted radio transmissions that indicated their cover was blown and no element of surprise

They went in anyway into a hornets nest

So if true whomever made that decision really mucked up the show

If that person decided he could not face an angry CIC or take the blame for an abortive mission because #MAGA GOD DAMMIT! Well God have mercy, the heat of battle on all

But in their after action review I have a feeling that commander will be faulted and hopefully cashiered


 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
18. But Shithead said he knew better than all the military generals combined.
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:28 AM
Feb 2017

He needs to tone his shit back. Trump will have burnt all his bridges by May.

Blaukraut

(5,693 posts)
23. Someone needs to take the toys away from him and put him in time out. NOW!
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 02:04 AM
Feb 2017

If he is left alone, he'll get us all killed.

Blaukraut

(5,693 posts)
25. It'll have to be congress, sadly
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 02:12 AM
Feb 2017

Not holding out much hope for that until that craven cabal has milked Trump dry for their own agenda.

Jopin Klobe

(779 posts)
26. "... the highest level people were there ..." ...
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 02:31 AM
Feb 2017

... Secretary Mattis, the Joint Chiefs Chairman Dunford, Steve Bannon, Mike Flynn, Jared Kushner and Vice President Pence ...

... seriously? ...

"... the highest level people were there ..." ??? ...

... there are people in repeat anger management classes that are of a higher level ...

fishwax

(29,149 posts)
27. why would anyone expect him to do his homework just because lives are on the line
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 02:34 AM
Feb 2017

Details are hard.

Obviously, not every military operation is successful. But there is an extraordinary passage in this article just out from Reuters. What Reuters identifies as "U.S. military officials" says that " Trump approved his first covert counterterrorism operation without sufficient intelligence, ground support or adequate backup preparations."

lindysalsagal

(20,648 posts)
35. Is POTUS supposed to make pressers about Seal deaths?
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 07:18 AM
Feb 2017

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't that tip off our enemies when we go public with their successes? Are we supposed to make all of this public?

But the bigger question is will fRump ever feel the least bit guilty about this death and the injuries and the $75mil?

I guess this is how he'll make our military better.....

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
40. Pretty Incredible that the Pentagon is blaming the president. A mission being planned for months
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 07:01 PM
Feb 2017

suffers from lack of intelligence??? J-SOC? Special Forces?? WTF??

This is an extraordinary and yet also ambiguous statement. It suggests that Trump somehow jumped the gun, approving the mission without adequate intelligence or support. But of course missions come to the President through a chain of command. If there's not enough operational intelligence, he should be told that by his military advisors. It's not like the President can dial into troops in the region directly and order a strike. Available reports suggest that the decision was made at a dinner the President had with Secretary Mattis, the Joint Chiefs Chairman Dunford, Steve Bannon, Mike Flynn, Jared Kushner and Vice President Pence. Dunford is the President's chief military advisor and Mattis is the immediate link in the chain of command. So the highest level people were there to give the President whatever information he needed.

NNadir

(33,512 posts)
41. How can the military compare a military operation with the importance of Apprentice ratings?
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 09:27 PM
Feb 2017

They obviously have their priorities wrong.

I wonder what their reaction will be when they're ordered to invade Mexico, or drop nukes on Australia?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TPM - "Pentagon Points Fi...